Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theory structure, reduction, and disciplinary integration in biology

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the nature of theory structure in biology and considers the implications of those theoretical structures for theory reduction. An account of biological “theories” as interlevel prototypes embodying causal sequences, and related to each other by strong analogies, is presented, and examples from the neurosciences are provided to illustrate these “middle-range” theories. I then go on to discuss several modifications of Nagel's classical model of theory reduction, and indicate at what stages in the development of reductions these models might best apply. Finally I consider several implications of these analyses of theory structure and reduction for disciplinary integration in biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, E.: 1959, ‘The Foundations of Rigid Body Mechanics and the Derivation of its Laws from Those of Particle Mechanics’, in L. Henkin, P. Suppes and A. Tarski (eds.),The Axiomatic Method, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 250–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J.: 1981, ‘What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?’ In P.D. Asquith and R.N. Giere (eds.),PSA-1980, Vol 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, pp. 397–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J.: 1987, ‘On Behalf of the Samantic View’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J.: 1991, ‘The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis (And Its Role as a Unifying Principle in Philosophy of Biology’ (draft manuscript).

  • Bechtel, W.: 1986, ‘Biochemistry: A Cross Disciplinary Endeavor that Discovered a Distinctive Domain’, in W. Bechtel (ed.),Integrating Scientific Disciplines, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W.: 1993, ‘Integrating Sciences by Creating New Disciplines’,this volume.

  • Benzer, S.: 1956, ‘The Elementary Units of Heredity’, in W.D. McElroy and B. Glass (eds.),A Symposium on the Chemical Basis of Heredity, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 70–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S.G.: 1966, ‘Kinetic Theory I and II, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, R.: 1993, ‘Unification and Coherence as Methodological Objectives in the Biological Sciences’,this volume.

  • Causey, R.: 1977,Unity of Science, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Patricia Smith: 1986,Neurophilosophy, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Patricia Smith: 1988, ‘The Significance of Neuroscience for Philosophy’,Trends in Neurosciences 11, 304–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Paul: 1979,Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Paul: 1981, ‘Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes’,Journal of Philosophy 78, 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Paul: 1984,Matter and Consciousness: A Contemporary Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culp, S. and P. Kitcher: 1989, ‘Theory Structure and Theory Change in Contemporary Molecular Biology’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40, 459–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, L. and N. Maull: 1977, ‘Interfield Theories’,Philosophy of Science 44, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.K.: 1962, ‘Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism’, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.),Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 28–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, W.N., G.A. Clark, and E.R. Kandel: 1988, ‘Parallel Processing of Short-term Memory for Sensitization’ inAplysia, Journal of Neurobiology 19, 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesereth, M. and N. Nilsson: 1987,Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, M.: 1987,Readings in Nonmotonic Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G.: 1965,Aspects of Scientific Explanation, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, C.: 1981, ‘Towards a General Theory of Reduction. Part I: Historical and Scientific Setting. Part II: Identity in Reduction. Part III: Cross-categorical Reduction.’Dialogue 20, 38–59, 201–236, 496–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.: 1974,Philosophy of Biological Science, Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.: 1976, ‘Informal Aspects of Theory Reduction’, in R.S. Cohen et al., (eds.)PSA-1974, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 653–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.: 1981, ‘Reduction and Genetics,’The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6, 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquard, A.: 1974,The Genetic Structure of Populations, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E.: 1979, ‘Small Systems of Neurons’,Scientific American (September 1979).

  • Kandel, E.: 1987, ‘Preface’ in Kandel, E. (ed.),Molecular Neurobiology in Neurology and Psychiatry. Raven Press, New York, pp. vii-ix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E.: 1988, Report on ‘Cell and Molecular Biological Studies of Learning’, inResearch in Progress — 1988. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Bethesda, MD, pp. 165+167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E., V. Castellucci, P. Goelet, and S. Schacher: 1987, in E. Kandel (ed.),Molecular Neurobiology in Neurology and Psychiatry, Raven Press, New York, pp. 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E. and J. Schwartz (eds.): 1985,Principles of Neural Sciences, 2nd ed., New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E., J. Schwartz, and T. Jessell (eds.): 1991,Principles of Neural Science, 3rd ed., New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1984, ‘1953 and all that: A tale of two sciences’,Philosophical Review 93, 335–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1989, ‘Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World’, in P. Kitcher and W.C. Salmon (eds.),Scientific Explanation, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 410–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuffler, S., J. Nichols, and A. Martin: 1984,From Neuron to Brain, 2nd ed., Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1962, 1970,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, B.: 1990,Genes IV, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E.: 1988,The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J.: 1974,The Cement of the Universe, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, S., D. Glanzman, S. Small, A. Dyke, E. Kandel, and R. Hawkins: 1987 ‘Tail Shock produces inhibition as well as sensitization of the siphon-withdrawal reflex ofAplysia: Possible behavioral role for presynaptic inhibition mediated by the peptide Phe-Met-Arg-Phe-NH2’,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 84, 8730–8734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1982,The Growth of Biological Thought, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morowitz, H.: 1985,Models for Biomedical Research: A New Perspective. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: 1949, ‘The Meaning of Reduction in the Natural Sciences’, in R. Stauffer (ed.),Science and Civilization, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: 1961,The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace, and World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1957, ‘The Aim of Science’,Ratio 1, 24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A.: 1985,The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1973,Philosophy of Biology, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1976, ‘Reduction in Genetics’, in R.S. Cohenet al. (eds.),PSA-1974, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 653–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.C.: 1989, ‘Four Decades of Scientific Explanation’, in P. Kitcher and W.C. Salmon (eds.),Scientific Explanation, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 3–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S.: 1989, ‘Reductionism and Molecular Biology: A Reappraisal’, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S.: 1991, ‘Models of Reduction and Categories of Reductionism’,Synthese (in press).

  • Schaffner, K.: 1967, ‘Approaches to Reduction’,Philosophy of Science 34, 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.: 1969, ‘Correspondence Rules’,Philosophy of Science 36, 280–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.: 1972,Nineteenth-Century Aether Theories, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.: 1976, ‘Reduction in the Biomedical Sciences: Problems and Prospects’, in R. Cohenet al. (eds.),PSA-1974, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 613–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.: 1977, ‘Reduction, Reductionism, Values, and Progress in the Biomedical Sciences’, in R. Colodny (eds.),Logic, Laws, and Life, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 143–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.: 1980, ‘Theory Structure in the Biomedical Sciences’,Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5, 57–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.: 1986, ‘Exemplar Reasoning about Biological Models and Diseases: A Relation between the Philosophy of Medicine and Philosophy of Science’,Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11, 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.: 1988, ‘Computerized Implementation of Biomedical Theory Structures: An Artificial Intelligence Approach’, in A. Fine, A. Machamer and P. Machamer (eds.),PSA-1986, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, pp. 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.: 1992a, ‘Philosophy of Medicine’, in J. Earmanet al., Philosophy of Science: An Introduction, Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, NJ, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.: 1992b,Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapere, D.: 1974, ‘Scientific Theories and Their Domains’, in F. Suppe (ed.): 1974, 1977, pp. 518–565.

  • Sklar, L.: 1967, ‘Types of Inter-Theoretic Reduction’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18, 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J.J.C.: 1963,Philosophy and Scientific Realism, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (ed.): 1984,Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, van der W.J.: 1993, ‘Towards Disciplinary Disintegration in Biology’,this volume.

  • Steen, van der W.J., and H. Kamminga: 1991, ‘Laws and Natural History in Biology’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, in press.

  • Suppe, F.: 1974, 1977,The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed., University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.: 1957,Introduction to Logic, Van Nostrand, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.: n.d. [1964], ‘What is a Scientific Theory’, A Forum Lecture Delivered on the Voice of America. Republished in S. Morgenbesser (ed.): 1967,Philosophy of Science Today, Basic Books, New York, pp. 000–000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.D.et al.: 1987,Molecular Biology of the Gene, 4th ed., 2 vols. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M.: 1970, ‘Deducing the Consequences of Evolution: A Mathematical Model’,Journal of Theoretical Biology 29, 383–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.: 1976a, ‘Reductive Explanation: A Functional Account’, in R.S. Cohenet al. (ed.),PSA-1974, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 671–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.: 1976b, ‘Reductionism, Levels of Organization, and the Mind-Body Problem’, in G. Globus, G. Maxwell and I. Savodnik (eds.),Consciousness and the Brain: A Scientific and Philosophical Inquiry, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 199–267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 714 T. Gelman Library, George Washington University, 2130 H St. NW, 20052, Washington, D.C., USA

    Kenneth F. Schaffner

Authors
  1. Kenneth F. Schaffner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schaffner, K.F. Theory structure, reduction, and disciplinary integration in biology. Biol Philos 8, 319–347 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00860432

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00860432

Key words

Search

Navigation