# On what it takes to be a world

## Authors

DOI: 10.1007/BF00763476

- Cite this article as:
- Albert, D.Z. & Barrett, J.A. Topoi (1995) 14: 35. doi:10.1007/BF00763476

## Abstract

A many-worlds interpretation is of quantum mechanics tells us that the linear equations of motion are the true and complete laws for the time-evolution of every physical system and that the usual quantum-mechanical states provide complete descriptions of all possible physical situations. Such an interpretation, however, denies the standard way of understanding quantum-mechanical states. When the pointer on a measuring device is in a superposition of pointing many different directions, for example, we are to understand this as many pointers, each in a different*world*, each pointing in a different determinate direction. We ask here whether such talk makes any genuinely intelligible sense of the term “world”. We conclude that it does not.