On what it takes to be a world
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A many-worlds interpretation is of quantum mechanics tells us that the linear equations of motion are the true and complete laws for the time-evolution of every physical system and that the usual quantum-mechanical states provide complete descriptions of all possible physical situations. Such an interpretation, however, denies the standard way of understanding quantum-mechanical states. When the pointer on a measuring device is in a superposition of pointing many different directions, for example, we are to understand this as many pointers, each in a differentworld, each pointing in a different determinate direction. We ask here whether such talk makes any genuinely intelligible sense of the term “world”. We conclude that it does not.
- DeWitt, B. S., Graham, N. eds. (1973) The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
- Everett, H. (1957) “Relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 29: pp. 454-62 CrossRef
- Everett, H., III.: 1973, ‘Theory of the universal wave-function’, in DeWitt and Graham (eds.) (1973).
- Gell-Mann, M., Hartle, J. B. Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology. In: Zurek, W. H. eds. (1990) Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, pp. 425-58
- Omnés, R. (1992) Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 64: pp. 339-82 CrossRef
- Zeh, H. D.: 1970, ‘On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory’, originally inFoundations of Physics, 1; reprinted inQuantum Theory and Measurement, by Wheeler and Zurek (eds.) (1983), Princeton Univesity Press, Princeton.
- On what it takes to be a world
Volume 14, Issue 1 , pp 35-37
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links