Abstract
The Bohr-Heisenberg scheme, which forms the basis of any current version of the standard or Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, is shown to be internally inconsistent. Although the inconsistencies demonstrated here are directly relatable to Einstein's opinion that it is unsatisfactory to interpret physical theory solely in terms of the knowledge gained from experimental outcomes, it is nevertheless shown that Einstein's view requires important modification. The implications of the Bohr-Heisenberg schem's self-inconsistency are discussed in relation to Bell's theorem and Aspect's experiments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., and Roger, G. (1982),Phys. Rev. Lett. 49(25), 1804–7.
Bell, J. S. (1964),Physics 1(3), 195–200.
Bohr, N. (1928),Nature (London) 121, 580–590; reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek (1983), pp. 97–126.
Bohr, N. (1935),Phys. Rev. 48, 696–702.
Bohr, N. (1949), “Discussions with Einstein,” inAlbert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Open Court, La Salle, Illinois).
Bohr, N. (1962), “The genesis of quantum mechanics,” reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek (1983), pp. 74–78.
Bohr, N. (1963),Essays (1958–1962) on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Interscience, New York).
Born, M. (1943),Experiment and Theory in Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
de Broglie, L. (1971), “A new interpretation concerning the coexistence of waves and particles,” inPerspectives in Quantum Theory, W. Yourgrau and A. van der Merwe, eds. (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).
d'Espagnat, B. (1976),Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts).
Einstein, A. (1939), letter to E. Schrödinger, inAlbert Einstein: Letters on Wave Mechanics: Correspondence with H. A. Lorenz, Max Planck, and Erwin Schrödinger, K. Prizibram, ed. (Philosophical Library, New York, 1967; paperback reprint, 1986).
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N. (1935),Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780.
Heisenberg, W. (1927), “The physical content of quantum kinematics and mechanics,” English translation in Wheeler and Zurek (1983), pp. 62–84.
Heisenberg, W. (1930),The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory (Chicago University Press, Chicago; reprinted by Dover, New York, 1949).
Heisenberg, W. (1958a),Physics and Philosophy (Harper, New York); citations from Harper Torchbooks edn., 1962.
Heisenberg, W. (1958b),Daedalus 87, 95–108.
Heisenberg, W. (1961),On Modern Physics (Orion Press, London).
Heisenberg, W. (1971),Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations (Harper, New York).
Hooker, C. A. (1972), inParadigms and Paradoxes, R. G. Colodney, ed. (Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh).
Jammer, M. (1966),The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York).
London, F., and Bauer, E. (1939), “The theory of observations in quantum mechanics,” English translation in Wheeler and Zurek (1983), pp. 217–259.
Pais, A. (1982a),‘Subtle is the Lord’... The Science and Life of Albert Einstein (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
Pais, A. (1982b),Science 218, 1193–1198.
Peres, A. (1985),Found. Phys. 15(2), 201–205.
Rohrlich, F. (1983),Science 221, 1251–1255.
Schiff, L. I. (1968),Quantum Mechanics, 3rd edn. (McGraw-Hill, New York).
Wheeler J. A., and Zurek, W. (1983), eds.,Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton University Press, Princeton).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stuart, C.I.J.M. Inconsistency of the Copenhagen interpretation. Found Phys 21, 591–622 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733260
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733260