Skip to main content
Log in

Comments on “A more precise statement of Hamilton's principle”

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among the problems C. D. Bailey has questioned in a recent paper (Ref. 1) are a precise and general formulation of Hamilton's variational principle and the establishment of a sufficiency criterion for this to be a minimum principle. In this paper, we will try to answer these questions using the geometric theory of classical mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. C. D. Bailey,Found. Phys. 11, 279 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Warner,Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie Groups (Scott and Foresman, Genview, Ill., 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. I. Arnold,Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu,Foundations of Differential Geometry (Interscience (Wiley), New York, 1963 and 1969), Volumes I and II.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yurtsever, U. Comments on “A more precise statement of Hamilton's principle”. Found Phys 13, 529–537 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00729513

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00729513

Keywords

Navigation