Skip to main content
Log in

An interaction interpretation of special relativity theory. Part II

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interaction interpretation of special relativity theory (elaborated in Part I) is discussed in relation to quantum theory. The relativistic transformations (Lorentz processes) of physical variables, on the interaction interpretation, are observation-interaction dependent, just as are the physical values (eigenvalues) of systems described by quantum-theoretic state functions; a common, basic structure of the special relativity and quantum theories can therefore be presented. The constancy of the light speed is shown to follow from interaction-transformations of frequency and wavelength variables. A parallelism is suggested between, on the one hand, the Lorentz-Clausius distinction for relativistic transformations, and, on the other, the distinction between observation-dependent and observation-independent natural processes. The empirical study of rates of macroscopic clocks can provide a critical test of the interaction interpretation and of a possible extension to gravitational time changes; the role of time as prior determinant of natural process is at issue. The Hafele-Keating observations are of general relativity effects on clocks in accelerated motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Bohr,Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1934), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Schlegel, An interaction interpretation of special relativity theory. Part I,Found. Phys. 3, 169 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Messiah,Quantum Mechanics, transl. by G. M. Temmer and J. Potter (Wiley, New York, 1964), Vol. I, p. 65; Vol. II, p. 884.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Heisenberg, “The Development of the Interpretation of Quantum Theory,” inNiels Bohr and the Development of Physics, W. Pauli, ed. (Pergamon Press, London, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Einstein,Ann. Physik. 17, 891 (1905); English transl. by W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffery, inThe Principle of Relativity (Dover, New York), pp. 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Grünbaum,Philosophical Problems of Space and Time (Knopf, New York, 1963), pp. 342–368.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. de Broglie,Ann. Phys. 3, 22 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Frenkel,Wave Mechanics (Oxford Univ. Press, 1936), Vol. I, Sec. 4.

  9. R. Schlegel,Time and the Physical World (Dover, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. C. Hafele and Richard E. Keating,Science 177, 166–170 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. C. Hafele,Nature 227, 270 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. C. Tolman,Relativity, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology (Oxford Univ. Press, 1934), Secs. 79, 83.

  13. R. V. Pound and G. A. Rebka,Phys. Rev. Letters 4, 337 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. J. Hay, J. P. Schiffer, T. E. Cranshaw, and P. A. Egelstaff,Phys. Rev. Letters 4, 165 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schlegel, R. An interaction interpretation of special relativity theory. Part II. Found Phys 3, 277–295 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708672

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708672

Keywords

Navigation