Skip to main content
Log in

On objectivity and subjectivity in statistical inference: A response to Mayo

  • Causation And Scientific Inference And Related Matters
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we respond to the article ‘An Objective Theory of Statistical Testing’ by D. G. Mayo (1983). We argue that the theory of testing developed by Mayo, NPT*, is neither novel nor objective. We also respond to the claims made by Mayo against Bayesian theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger, J. O.: 1980, Statistical Decision Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. O.: 1984, ‘The Robust Bayesian Viewpoint’, in J. B. Kadane (ed.), Robustness of Bayesian Analyses, Elsevier, New York, pp. 63–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boen, J. R. and D. A. Zahn: 1982, The Human Side of Statistical Consulting, Lifetime Learning Pub., Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B.: 1964, ‘Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources’, in H. E. Kyburg and H. E. Smokler (eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability, (Wiley, New York, pp. 93–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D., R. Pisani, and R. Purves: 1979, Statistics, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J.: 1976, ‘The Bayesian Influence, or How to Sweep Subjectivism Under the Carpet’, in W. L. Harper and C. A. Hooker (eds.), Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference and Statistical Theories of Science, Vol II, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 125–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P. J.: 1981, Robust Statistics, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H.: 1961, Theory of Probability 3rd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. L.: 1959, Testing Statistical Hypotheses, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, B. L.: 1976, Statistical Theory 3rd ed., Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. V.: 1976, ‘Bayesian Statistics’, in W. L. Harper and C. A. Hooker (eds.), Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference and Statistical Theories of Science, Vol II, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 353–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. V. and L. D. Phillips: 1976, ‘Inference For a Bernoulli Process (a Bayesian View)’, The American Statistician 30, 112–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, D. G.: 1981, ‘In Defense of the Neyman-Pearson Theory of Confidence Intervals’, Philosophy of Science, 48, 269–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, D. G.: 1983, ‘An Objective Theory of Statistical Testing’, Synthese 57, 297–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J. et al.: 1962, The Foundations of Statistical Inference, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J.: 1972, The Foundations of Statistics, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé, H.: 1959, The Analysis of Variance, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Witmer, P.A., Clayton, M.K. On objectivity and subjectivity in statistical inference: A response to Mayo. Synthese 67, 369–379 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540077

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540077

Keywords

Navigation