Skip to main content
Log in

Comment on John Yolton's ‘Is There a History of Philosophy? Some difficulties and suggestions’

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this comment on John Yolton's ‘Is There a History of Philosophy?’ (Yolton, 1985) I review his account of the development during the 17th to 19th centuries of a common sense of the range of philosophical problems and of the canon of philosophical works. I suggest that his account may be read in light of Rorty's four genres of historiography (Rorty, 1984). I criticize his view of the place of the history of philosophy in philosophy as too timid, though correct as far as it goes. I then suggest, but do not attempt to establish, a bolder thesis. Finally, I raise some doubts about the adequacy of Yolton's reading of Descartes and Berkeley set out in two of his ‘Puzzlements.’ The ‘Puzzlements’ themselves are supposed to illustrate typical misreading of major figures in the history of philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkeley, George: 1710, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.

  • Curley, E. M.: 1986, ‘Dialogues with the Dead’, Synthese, this issue, pp. 33–49.

  • Descartes, Rene: 1964, ‘Letter to Princess Elizabeth’, (21 May, 1643) in Elizabeth Anscombe and Peter Geach (eds.), Descartes: Philosophical Writings, Thomas Nelson and Son Ltd., London, p. 277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, D.: 1983, ‘Understanding Interaction: What Descartes Should Have Told Elizabeth’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy XXI, Supplement, pp. 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, D.: 1986, ‘Learning from the Past’, Synthese, this issue, pp. 91–114.

  • Hume, David: 1748, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.

  • Kant, Immanuel: 1950, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, The Liberal Arts Press, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.: 1984, ‘The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres’, in R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, and Q. Skinner (eds.), Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, Wilfred: 1968, Science and Metaphysics, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, Benedict: 1677, Ethics.

  • Yolton, John: 1984, Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yolton, John: 1986, ‘Is There a History of Philosophy?’, Synthese, this issue, pp. 3–21.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, W.H. Comment on John Yolton's ‘Is There a History of Philosophy? Some difficulties and suggestions’. Synthese 67, 23–32 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485507

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485507

Keywords

Navigation