Skip to main content
Log in

Tomberlin, Frege, and Guise theory: A note on the methodology of dia-philosophical comparisons

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Tomberlin's comparative claims about the superiority of the De Dicto-De Re Account over Guise Theory concerning referential opacity are abortively premature. Nevertheless, he may be right. Yet the order of the day is to develop the De Re-De Dicto Account to the hilt. Not until this is done can any useful dia-philosophical comparison of the two theories yield any fruit. My deep desire is, of course, for the sheer enjoyment of experiencing the world from the perspective of each of the two views, indeed, from the perspective of other views — e.g., Frege's Sense/Referent Theory — that can be developed to the same data-encompassing stage as Guise Theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1974, ‘Thinking and the Structure of the World’, Philosophia 4, 1974, 3–40, and Critica 6, 1972, 43–81.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1977, ‘Perception, Belief, and the Structure of Physical Objects and Consciousness’, Synthese 35, 285–351.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1978, ‘Philosophical Method and the Theory of Predication and Identity’, Noûs 12, 189–210.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1975, Thinking and Doing: The Philosophical Foundations of Institutions, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1980, On Philosophical Method, Noûs Publications, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark, Romane: 1983, ‘Predication Theory: Guised and Undisguised’, in [11] below.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Perry, John: 1983, ‘Castañeda on He and I’, in [11] below.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Plantinga, Alvin: 1983, ‘Guise Theory’, in [11] below.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quine, W. V. O.: 1956, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, The Journal of Philosophy 53, 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tomberlin, James E.: 1984, ‘Identity, Intensionality, and Intentionality’, Synthese 61, 111–131.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tomberlin, James E. (ed.): 1983, Agent, Language, and the Structure of the World: Essays in Honor of Hector-Neri Castañeda With His Replies, Hacket Publishing Company, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1952, Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castañeda, HN. Tomberlin, Frege, and Guise theory: A note on the methodology of dia-philosophical comparisons. Synthese 61, 135–147 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485312

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485312

Keywords

Navigation