Skip to main content
Log in

New reasons for realism

  • Articles
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Both the psychology of perception and the philosophy of perception seem to show a new face when the process is considered at its own level, distinct from that of sensation. Unfamiliar conceptions in physics, anatomy, physiology, psychology, and phenomenology are required to clarify the separation and make it plausible. But there have been so many dead ends in the effort to solve the theoretical problems of perception that radical proposals may now be acceptable. Scientists are often more conservative than philosophers of science. I end, therefore, as I began, with a plea for help.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibson, J.J. New reasons for realism. Synthese 17, 162–172 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485025

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485025

Keywords

Navigation