Skip to main content
Log in

Living things as hierarchically organized structures

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hierarchical organization is an essential characteristic of living things. Although most biologists affirm the concept of living things as hierarchically organized structures, there are widespread differences of interpretation in the meaning of hierarchy and of how the concept of hierarchy applies to living things. One such basic difference involves the distinction between the concept of control hierarchy and classification hierarchy. It is suggested that control hierarchies are distinguished from classification hierarchies in that while the former involve authority relationships between levels, the latter do not. This is illustrated in an analysis of proposed hierarchies of replicators and interactors.

The analysis of levels of hierarchies and their relationships also brings up the part-whole problem. An authority relationship between levels implies that the whole has a determining influence on the parts that make up the whole, and that parts have no independent, meaningful existence apart from the whole. The concept of an authority relationship in a part-whole relationship introduces the question of the independence or sovereignty of the components of the subordinate levels in a hierarchically organized living thing. This problem is discussed along with an analysis of the rather novel theory of enkapsis proposed by H. Dooyeweerd, in which he distinguishes part-whole relationships from enkaptic relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, T. F. H. and T. B. Starr: 1982, Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L. von: 1952, The Problem of Life: An Evaluation of Modern Biological Thought, Watts & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L. von: 1968, General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, George Braziller, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, L. W.: 1987, The Evolution of Individuality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T.: 1974, ‘“Downward Causation” in Hierarchically Organised Biological Systems’, in F. J. Ayala and T. Dobzhansky (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 179–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooyeweerd, H.: 1957, A New Critique of Theoretical Thought, vol. III: The Structures of Individuality of Temporal Reality, Uitgeverij H. J. Paris, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N.: 1985, Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and S. N. Salthe: 1984, ‘Hierarchy and Evolution’, in R. Dawkins and M. Ridley (eds.), Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 184–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grene, M.: 1969, ‘Hierarchy: One Word, How Many Concepts?’, in L. L. Whyte, A. G. Wilson and D. Wilson (eds.), Hierarchical Structures, Elsevier, New York, pp. 56–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grene, M.: 1987, ‘Hierarchies in Biology’, Amer. Scientist 75, 504–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grene, M.: 1988, ‘Hierarchies and Behavior’, in G. Greenberg and E. Tobach (eds.) Evolution of Social Behavior and Integrative Levels, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobstein, C.: 1962, ‘Levels and Ontogeny’, Amer. Scientist 50, 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobstein, C.: 1969, ‘Organizational Levels and Explanation’, J. Hist. Biol. 2, 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobstein, C.: 1973, ‘Hierarchical Order and Neogenesis’, in H. H. Pattee (ed.), Hierarchy Theory: The Challenges of Complex Systems, George Braziller, New York, pp. 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.: 1984, Understanding Our World: An Integral Ontology, University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.: ‘Individuality and Selection’, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11, 311–22.

  • Koestler, A.: 1969, ‘Beyond Atomism and Holism: The Concept of the Holon’, in A. Koestler and J. R. Smythies (eds.), Beyond Reductionism: New Perspectives in the Life Sciences, Macmillan, New York, pp. 193–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, E.: 1972, Introduction to Systems Philosophy: Towards a New Paradigm of Contemporary Thought, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G.: 1978, Living Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. H.: 1970, ‘The Problem of Biological Hierarchy’, in C. H. Waddington (ed.), Towards a Theoretical Biology, Vol. 3, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 117–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. H.: 1973a, ‘The Physical Basis and Origin of Hierarchical Control’, in H. H. Pattee (ed.), Hierarchy Theory: The Challenges of Complex Systems, George Braziller, New York, pp. 71–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. H.: 1973b, ‘Postscript: Unsolved Problems and Potential Applications of Hierarchy Theory’, in H. H. Pattee (ed.), Hierarchy Theory: The Challenges of Complex Systems, George Braziller, New York, pp. 129–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.: 1968, ‘Life's Irreducible Structure’, Science 160, 1308–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe, S. N.: 1985, Evolving Hierarchical Systems: Their Structure and Representation, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A.: 1962, ‘The Architecture of Complexity’, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106, 467–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E. S. and N. Eldredge: 1984, ‘Individuals, Hierarchies, and Processes: Towards a More Complete Evolutionary Theory’, Paleobiology 10, 146–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P. A.: 1963, ‘The Cell as a Unit’, J. Theoret. Biol. 5, 389–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P. A.: 1969, ‘The Living System: Determinism Stratified’, in A. Koestler and J. R. Smythies (eds.), Beyond Reductionism: New Perspectives in the Life Sciences, Macmillan, New York, pp. 3–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P. A.: 1971, ‘The Basic Concept of Hierarchic Systems’, in P. A. Weiss (ed.), Hierarchically Organized Systems in Theory and Practice, Hafner Pub. Co., New York, pp. 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P. A.: 1973, The Science of Life: The Living Systems — a System for Living, Futura Pub. Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, J. H.: 1929 (reissued 1967), Biological Principles: a Critical Study, Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zylstra, U. Living things as hierarchically organized structures. Synthese 91, 111–133 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484972

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484972

Keywords

Navigation