Skip to main content
Log in

The independence results of set theory: An informal exposition

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Cohen, P.: Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, Benjamin, N.Y., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fitting, M. C.: Intuitionistic Logic, Model Theory and Forcing, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gödel, K.: The Consistency of the Axiom of Choice and of the Generalized Continuum-Hypothesis with the Axioms of Set Theory, Princeton U.P., N.J., 1940.

  4. Rosser, J. B.: Simplified Independence Proofs, Academic Press, N.Y. 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors wish to thank Nicholas Rescher and Melvin Fitting for encouragement in writing this paper, and Paul Teller for helpful comments on various sections. We owe a special debt to Wilson Zaring, who offered detailed comments on the whole of an earlier draft of this paper. This paper was written under the auspices of CUNY-RF grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levin, M.E., Levin, M.R. The independence results of set theory: An informal exposition. Synthese 38, 1–34 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484751

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484751

Keywords

Navigation