Skip to main content
Log in

Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Students' alternative frameworks (frequently regarded as misconceptions) play a crucial role in science concept learning. Accumulated research findings indicate that alternative frameworks are resistant to extinction despite formal instruction.

This paper presents an instructional strategy based on the thesis that science concept learning involves cognitive accommodation of an initially held alternative framework. The strategy consists of three phases: (1) exposing alternative frameworks, (2) creating conceptual conflict, (3) encouraging cognitive accommodation. The first phase is facilitated through an “exposing event,” while the second and third focus on a “discrepant event.”

The authors have used previous research findings about student alternative frame-works for the structure of a gas to create exposing and discrepant events for an introduction to the particle model of gases. The paper presents a case study of two lessons in a sequence on the particle model, accompanied by an analysis of the phases of the instructional strategy employed for cognitive accommodation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. C. (1977). “The notion of schemata and the acquisition of knowledge,” in R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro and W. E. Montague, (eds.), Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Chapter 12, pp. 415–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archenhold, W., Driver, R., Orton, A. and Wood Robinson, C., (eds.), (1980). Cognitive Development Research in Science and Mathematics. Leeds, England: The University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning, New York: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D. and Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. (First edition by Ausubel, 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1965). “Curiosity and education,” in J. D. Krumboltz, (ed.), Learning and the Educational Process. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. I. (1977). Perception, Theory and Commitment: The new Philosophy of Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumby, M. (1979). “Problems in learning the concept of natural selection,” Journal of Biological Education, 13: 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E. and Anderson, J. (1980). “Factors influencing learning of classical mechanics,” American Journal of Physics 48: 1074–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. J. (1979). “The Role of Preconceptions and Representational Transformations in Understanding Physics and Mathematics,” Amherst, Mass.: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, M. and Osborne, R. (1981). “Physical Change”. A Working Paper of the Learning in Science Project, University of Waikato, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deadman, J. A. and Kelley, P. J. (1978). “What do secondary school boys understand about evolution and heredity before they are taught the topics?” Journal of Biological Education, 12: 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think. Boston: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Sessa, A. A. (1981). “Unlearning Aristotelian Physics.” MIT Education Division, working paper.

  • Driver, R. and Easley, J. (1978). “Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students,” Studies in Science Education, 5: 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, G. (1980). “Children's viewpoints of heat: A second look,” Science Education, 64: 323–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. (1978). “Critical barriers to science learning” Outlook, Issue 29, Autumn.

  • Johnstone, A. H. and Kellet, N. C. (1980). “Learning difficulties in school science-Towards a working hypothesis,” European Journal of Science Education, 2: 175–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kargbo, D. B., Hobbs, E. D. and Erickson, G. L. (1980). “Children's beliefs about inherited characteristics,” Journal of Biological Education, 14: 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R. (1977). “Science teaching and the development of reasoning,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14: 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R. and Stage, E. K. (1981). “Misconceptions in Science: Past Work and Present Approaches,” Group in Science and Mathematics Education, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefrere, P. (1981). “Making use of the knowledge you have,” Instructional Science, 10: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B. N. (1981). “An essay on error,” Instructional Science, 10: 237–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1981). “Phenomenography — deseribing conceptions of the world around us,” Instructional Science, 10: 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClosky, M., Caramazza, A. and Green, B. (1980). “Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naive beliefs about motion of objects,” Science, 210: 1139–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niesser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1980). “Twelve issues for cognitive science,” Cognitive Science, 4: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, H. F. and Clement, J. L. (1981). “Student misconceptions of an electric eircuit: What do they mean?” Journal of College Science Teaching, 10: 280–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D. (1977). A Theory of Education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, S. and Nussbaum, J. (1978) “Junior high school pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: An interview study,” Science Education, 62: 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, S. and Nussbaum, J. (1981). “Pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: a cross-age study,” Science Education, 65: 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, J. (1979). “Children's conceptions of the Earth as a cosmic body: A cross-age study,” Science Education, 63: 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, J. and Novick, S. (1982), “A Study of Conceptual Change in the Classroom,” paper presented at the NARST Meeting, Lake Geneva, Wisconsin, April.

  • Piaget, J. (1962). “Comments on Vigotsky's critical remarks,” in L. S. Vigotsky, Thought and Language, Cambridge: MIT Press and J. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1964). “Development and learning,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2: 176–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. and Gertzog, W. A. (1981). “Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change,” Science Education, (in press).

  • Rumelhart, D. E. and Ortony, A. (1977). “The representation of knowledge in memory,” in R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro and W. E. Montague, (eds.), Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, J. R. (1962). The Elementary School Training Program in Scientific Inquiry. Urbana: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. E. and Goodfield, J. (1962). The Architecture of Matter. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1972). Human Understanding, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viennot, L. (1979), “Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics,” European Journal of Science Education, 1: 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, M. C. (1977). “Learning as a generative process,” in M. C. Wittrock, (ed.), Learning and Instruction. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, pp. 621–631.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Based on a paper presented at the AERA convention, Los Angeles, California, April, 1981.

This paper was prepared while the first author was a visiting professor at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nussbaum, J., Novick, S. Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instr Sci 11, 183–200 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414279

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414279

Keywords

Navigation