Skip to main content
Log in

Remarks on the use of history as evidence

  • Testing Theories Of Scientific Change
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Agassi, Joseph: 1963, Toward an Historiography of Science, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannigan, Augustine: 1981, The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd, enlarged edition, 1970, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas: 1978, Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894–1912, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry: 1977, Progress and Its Problems, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry: 1983, ‘The Demise of the Demarcation Problem’, in R. S. Cohen and L. Laudan (eds.), Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac: 1672, ‘A Letter of Mr. Isaac Newton ... Containing his New Theory about Light and Colors’, Philosophical Transactions 6, 3075–3087.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, Thomas: 1976, ‘Theory Generalization, Problem Reduction, and the Unity of Science’, in R. S. Cohen et al. (eds.), PSA 1974, Reidel Dordrecht, pp. 33–75.

  • Nickles, Thomas: 1980, ‘Can Scientific Constraints Be Violated Rationally?’, in Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 285–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, Thomas: 1984, ‘Scoperta e Mutamento Scientifico’ (‘Discovery and Scientific Change’), Materiali Filosofici 10, 7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, Thomas: 1985, ‘Beyond Divorce: Current Status of the Discovery Debate’, Philosophy of Science 52, 177–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, Thomas: 1986, ‘Twixt Method and Madness’, in Nancy Nersessian (ed.), The Process of Science, Martinus Nijhoff, in press.

  • Nickles, Thomas: 1987, ‘From Natural Philosophy to Metaphilosophy of Science’, in P. Achinstein and R. Kargon (eds.), Theoretical Physics in the 100 Years since Lord Kelvin's Baltimore Lectures, MIT, Cambridge, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pera, Marcello: ‘History and Methodology of Science: A Divorce of Love,’ read at the 1985 International Congress for the History of Science, Berkeley.

  • Shapere, Dudley; 1984, Reason and the Search for Knowledge, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Alan: 1980, ‘The Evolving Structure of Newton's Theory of White Light and Color’, Isis 71, 211–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert: 1957, Models of Man, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert: 1967, ‘The Logic of Heuristic Decision Making’, as reprinted in Models of Discovery, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1977, pp. 154–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert: 1969, The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT, Cambridge, 2nd ed., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, Marshall: 1972, Methodological Foundations of Relativistic Mechanics, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweney, Ryan, Michael Doherty, and Clifford Mynatt: 1982, ‘Rationality and Disconfirmation: Further Evidence’, Social Studies of Science 12, 435–441.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is a critical response to ‘Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research’, by Larry Laudan, Arthur Donovan, Rachel Laudan, Peter Barker, Harold Brown, Jarrett Leplin, Paul Thagard, and Steve Wykstra, this issue, 141–223. I thank Marcello Pera for helpful discussion of these issues. However, he defends a position quite distinct from mine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nickles, T. Remarks on the use of history as evidence. Synthese 69, 253–266 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413983

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413983

Navigation