Skip to main content
Log in

Methodological individualism: Singular causal systems and their population manifestations

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to investigate the properties of singular causal systems and their population manifestations, with special concern for the thesis of methodological individualism, which claims that there are no properties of social groups that cannot be adequately explained exclusively by reference to properties of individual members of those groups, i.e., at the level of individuals. Individuals, however, may be viewed as singular causal systems, i.e., as instantiations of (arrangements of) dispositional properties. From this perspective, methodological individualism appears to be an ambiguous thesis: some properties of collections of (independent) systems of the same kind are reducible, but other properties of collections of (dependent) systems of the same kind are not. In cases of the first kind, therefore, methodological individualism is true, but trivial; while in cases of the second kind, it is significant, but false. Hence, if the arguments that follow are correct, at least some of the properties of social groups should qualify as emergent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Eells E.: 1968, ‘Probabilistic Causal Interaction’, Philosophy of Science 53, forthcoming.

  • Fetzer, J. H.: 1975, ‘On the Historical Explanation of Unique Events’, Theory and Decision 6, 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H.: 1977, ‘A World of Dispositions’, Synthese 34, 397–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H.: 1981, Scientific Knowledge, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H.: 1985, ‘Science and Sociobiology’, in J. H. Fetzer (ed.), Sociobiology and Epistemology, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 217–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R. N.: 1979, Understanding Scientific Reasoning, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R. N.: 1980, ‘Causal Systems and Statistical Hypotheses’, in L. J. Cohen (ed.), Applications of Inductive Logic, New York, Oxford, pp. 251–270.

  • Giere, R. N.: 1984, ‘Causal Models with Frequency Dependence’, Journal of Philosophy 81, 384–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. W.: 1983, ‘Aleatory Explanations Expanded’, in P. Asquith and T. Nickles (eds.), PSA 1982, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, pp. 208–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, C. R. and E. O. Wilson: 1981, Genes, Mind, and Culture, Harvard, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, Deborah: 1986, ‘Understanding Frequency Dependent Causation’, Philosophy of Science, forthcoming.

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1981, ‘Statistical Explanation Reconsidered’, Synthese 48, 437–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1982, ‘Frequency Dependent Causation’, Journal of Philosophy 79, 247–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1985, ‘Discussion: What Would Happen if Everyone Did It?’, Philosophy of Science 52, 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fetzer, J.H. Methodological individualism: Singular causal systems and their population manifestations. Synthese 68, 99–128 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413968

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413968

Keywords

Navigation