Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple causation, indirect measurement and generalizability in the social sciences

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fact that causal laws in the social sciences are most realistically expressed as both multivariate and stochastic has a number of very important implications for indirect measurement and generalizability. It becomes difficult to link theoretical definitions of general constructs in a one-to-one relationship to research operations, with the result that there is conceptual slippage in both experimental and nonexperimental research. It is argued that problems of this nature can be approached by developing specific multivariate causal models that incorporate sources of measurement bias, along with the theoretical variables of interest. Many general concepts are defined in such a way that causal assumptions are built into the definitions themselves. Additionally, in any given piece of research it is necessary to omit many variables from consideration, and this is often done without careful consideration of the assumptions required to justify such omissions. Finally, generalization to more inclusive populations or a diversity of settings ordinarily requires one to replace “constants” by variables. It is concluded that the criteria of parsimony, generalizability, and precision are incompatible, given the multivariate nature of social causation, and the author expresses his own preference for sacrificing parsimony in favor of the objectives of achieving increased precision and generalizability of social science laws.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blalock, H. M.: 1964, Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. M.: 1968, ‘The Measurement Problem: A Gap Between the Languages of Theory and Research’, in H. M. Blalock and A. B. Blalock (eds.), Methodology in Social Research, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. M.: 1982, Conceptualization and Measurement in the Social Sciences, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1959, Causality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costner, H. L.: 1969, ‘Theory, Deduction, and Rules of Correspondence’, American Journal of Sociology 75, 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costner, H. L.: 1971, ‘Utilizing Causal Models to Discover Flaws in Experiments’, Sociometry 34, 398–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D. H., R. D. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky: 1971, Foundations of Measurement. Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. A., and P. Smith: 1965, ‘Experimental Designs of the Single-stimulus, All-or-Nothing Type’, American Sociological Review 30, 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A.: 1954, ‘Spurious Correlation: A Causal Interpretation’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 49, 467–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strotz, R. H., and H. O. A. Wold: 1960, ‘Recursive Versus Nonrecursive Systems: An Attempt at Synthesis’, Econometrica 28, 417–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. A.: 1968, ‘Hypothesis Validity and Experimental Laboratory Methods’, in H. M. Blalock and A. B. Blalock (eds.), Methodology in Social Research, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 390–427.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blalock, H.M. Multiple causation, indirect measurement and generalizability in the social sciences. Synthese 68, 13–36 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413965

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413965

Keywords

Navigation