Skip to main content
Log in

On some structural aspects of physical problems

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bachelard's concept of the problématique is used in order to classify physical problems and their interrelations. This classification is effectuated along two ‘dimensions’. Along the “horizontal dimension”, physical problems are divided into the kinds that the different modes of physics' development define. These modes are themselves determined by the interplay among the conceptual system, the object and the experimentation transactions specific to physics. Along the “vertical dimension”, physical problems are classified according to the different stages of ‘maturation’ they have to undergo before the process of their solution is effectively undertaken. To determine these ‘maturation’ stages, the Althusserian conception of ideology is used. The interrelations between physical problems are examined through the introduction and elaboration of the notion “interdependence network”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Althusser, L.: 1965, Pour Marx, Maspéro, Paris (English translation: 1968: For Marx, Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L.: 1971, ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses’, in his Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, NLB, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L.: 1974, Philosophie et Philosophie Spontanée des Savants, Maspéro, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L., Rancière, J., Macherey, P., Balibar, E., and Establet, R.: 1965, Lire le Capital, 2 Vols., Maspéro, Paris. Reissued in 4 Vols. in 1971 in Petite Collection Maspéro. English translation including only the contributions of Althusser and Balibar: 1968, Reading Capital, NLB, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, E.: 1978, ‘From Bachelard to Althusser: The Concept of ‘Epistemological Break’’, Economy and Society 7(3), 207–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltas, A.: 1987, ‘Ideological ‘Assumptions’ in Physics: Social Determinations of Internal Structures’, in A. Fine and P. Machamer (eds.), PSA 1986, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltas, A.: 1988, ‘The Structure of Physics as a Science’, in D. Batens and J. P. van Bendegem (eds.), Theory and Experiment, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltas, A.: 1989, ‘Louis Althusser and Joseph D. Sneed: A Strange Encounter in Philosophy of Science?’ in K. Gavroglou, Y. Goudaroulis and P. Nicolacopoulos (eds.), Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltas, A.: 1990, ‘Once Again on the Meaning of Physical Concepts’, in P. Nicolacopoulos (ed.), Greek Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.: 1978, Against Method, Verso Editions, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, G.: 1986, Atom and Individual in the Age of Newton, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavroglou, K.: 1985, ‘Popper's Tetradic Schema, Progressive Research Programs, and the Case of Parity Violation in Elementary Particle Physics 1935–1958’, Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, XV(2), 261–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavroglou, K.: 1986, ‘Recent Evidence and Further Comments on Parity Violation’, Historia Scientiarum No. 31, pp. 115–23.

  • Gavroglou, K. and Goudaroulis, Y.: 1989, Concepts out of Context(s): The Development of Low Temperature Physics 1881–1957, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1976, Proofs and Refutations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1977, Progress and its Problems, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawetz, T.: 1980, Wittgenstein and Knowledge, The Harvester Press, Sussex, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T.: 1981, ‘What is a Problem that we May Solve it?’, Synthese 47, 85–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T.: 1988, ‘Reconstructing Science: Discovery and Experiment’, in D. Batens and J. P. van Bendegem (eds.), Theory and Experiment, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pera, M.: 1987, ‘From Methodology to Dialectics: A post-Cartesian Approach to Scientific Rationality’ in A. Fine and P. Machamer (eds.), PSA 1986, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pera, M.: 1988, ‘Breaking the Link between Methodology and Rationality. A Plea for Rhetoric in Scientific Inquiry’, in D. Batens and J. P. van Bendegem (eds.), Theory and Experiment, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1972, On Certainty, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

It is a pleasure to thank Marcello Pera and Kostas Gavroglou for their very helpful comments and criticisms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baltas, A. On some structural aspects of physical problems. Synthese 89, 299–320 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413911

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413911

Keywords

Navigation