Skip to main content
Log in

The validity paradox in modal S 5

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bendieck, J.: 1952, ‘Die Lehre von den Konsequenzen bei Pseudo-Scotus’, Franziskanische Studien 34, 205–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochenski, J. M.: 1937, ‘Notes Historiques sur les Propositiones Modales’, Revue des Sciences Philosophiques 26, 673–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochenski, J. M.: 1938, ‘De Consequentiis Scholasticorum Earumque Origine’, Angelicum 15, 92–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buridan, J.: 1966, Sophisms on Meaning and Truth, trans. by T. K. Scott, Appleton-Century Croft, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R. M.: 1981, The First Person: An Essay on Reference and Intentionality, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, F. B.: 1952, Symbolic Logic, Ronald Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G. E.: 1982, John Buridan on Self-Reference: Chapter Eight of Buridan's ‘Sophistimata’ Translated with an Introduction and a Philosophical Commentary, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G. E. and M. J. Creswell: 1972, An Introduction to Modal Logic, Methuen and Co. Ltd.

  • Jacquette, D.: 1991a, ‘Validity, Self-reference and the Psuedo-Scotus Pseudo-Paradox’, in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation, Vol. 1A SICSAT, Amsterdam, pp. 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquette, D.: 1991b, ‘Buridan's Bridge’, Philosophy 66, 455–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, G. B.: 1983, ‘Self-referent Inference and the Liar Paradox’, Mind 92, 430–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneale, W. and M. Kneale: 1984, The Development of Logic, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mates, B.: 1965, ‘Psuedo-Scotus on the Soundness of Consequentia’, in T. M. Tymieniecka (ed.), Contributions to Logic and Methodology in Honor of J. M. Bochenski, North Holland Publishing Co., Amserdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, A. C.: 1972, ‘Notes on the Assertoric and Modal Propositional Logic of the Pseudo-Scotus’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 10, 273–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter of Spain: 1972, Tractatus Summulae Logicales, (First Critical Edition from the Manuscripts with an Introduction) ed. by L. M. De Rijk, Van Gorcum and Co., Assen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, G., R. Routley and J. Norman (eds.): 1989, Paraconsistent Logic: Essays in the Inconsistent, Philosophia Verlag, Munich and Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, S.: 1979, ‘Self-reference and Validity’, Synthese 42, 265–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. and R. Brandom: 1980, The Logic of Inconsistency: A Study in Non-Standard Possible-World Semantics and Ontology, Basil-Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, R. A.: 1988, Blindspots, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacquette, D. The validity paradox in modal S 5 . Synthese 109, 47–62 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413822

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413822

Navigation