Abstract
Duhem attempted to find a middle way between two positions he regarded as extremes, the conventionalism of Poincaré and the scientific realism of the majority of his scientific colleagues. He argued that conventionalism exaggerated the arbitrariness of scientific formulations, but that belief in atoms and electrons erred in the opposite direction by attributing too much logical force to explanatory theories. The instrumentalist sympathies so apparent in Duhem's writings on the history of astronomy are only partially counterbalanced by his view that science is progressing toward a ‘natural classification’ of the world.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Duhem, P.: 1905, ‘Physique de croyant’, Annles de Philosophie Chrétienne 77. Translated as an appendix in The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, 1954, pp. 273–311.
Duhem, P.: 1908a, Sozein ta Phainomena, Paris, Hermann. Translated by E. Doland and C. Maschler as To Save the Phenomena, 1969, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Duhem, P.: 1908b, ‘La valeur de la théorie physique’, Revue Générale des Sciences Pures et Appliquées 19, 7–19. Translated as an Appendix to The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, 1954, pp. 312–35.
Duhem, P.: 1914, La Théorie Physique, son objet et sa structure. Paris, Chevalier et Rivière, 1906. Second edition, Rivière, 1914. Translated by P. Wiener as The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, 1954, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Duhem, P.: 1915, La Science Allemande, Paris, Hermann.
Duhem, P.: 1917, ‘Notice sur les titres et travaux scientifiques de Pierre Duhem’ (Mai 1913), Memoires de la Société des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles de Bordeaux, series 7, 1, 151–7. Translated by Peter Barker and Roger Ariew as ‘Logical Examination of Physical Theory.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McMullin, E. Comment: Duhem's middle way. Synthese 83, 421–430 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413426
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413426