Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of the compressive strength of vertebral bodies of the lumbar spine by quantitative computed tomography

  • Articles
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ultimate compressive strength of 36 thoracolumbar vertebrae was determined experimentally. In addition, the trabecular bone mineral content was measured by single energy quantitative computed tomography. The areas of fractured endplates were also determined by computed tomography. The results show that a linear relationship exists between the compressive strength and the product of bone density and endplate area. These data allow an in vivo prediction of vertebral body strength using a noninvasive method with a standard error of estimate amounting to less than 0.95 kN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell GH, Dunbar O, Beck JS, Gibb A (1967) Variations in strength of vertebrae with age and their relation to osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Res 1:75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brinckmann P, Johannleweling N, Hilweg D, Biggemann M (1987) Fatigue fracture of human lumbar vertebrac. Clin Biomech 2:94

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, Hilweg D Fatigue fracture in human lumbar vertebrae. Clin Biomech (Suppl) in press

  4. Buchanan JR, Myers C, Greer RB, Lloyd T (1987) Assessment of the risk of vertebral fracture in menopausal women. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 69:212

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carter DR, Hayes WC (1976) Fatigue life of compact bone. I. Effects of stress amplitude, temperature and density. J Biomech 9:27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Christiansen C, Christensen MS, McNair P, Hagen C (1980) Prevention of early postmenopausal bone loss: Controlled 2-year study in 315 normal females. Eur J Clin Invest 10:273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Firooznia H, Golimbu C, Rafii M, Schwartz MS (1986) Rate of spinal trabecular bone loss in normal perimenopausal women: CT measurement. Radiology 161:735

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Genant HK, Cann CE, Ettinger B, Gordan GS (1982) Quantitative computed tomography of vertebral spongiosa: A sensitive method for detecting early bone loss after oophorectomy. Ann Intern Med 79:699

    Google Scholar 

  9. Genant HK, Cann CE, Pozzi-Mucelli RS, Kanter AS (1983) Vertebral mineral determination by quantitative CT: clinical feasibility and normative data. J Comput Assist Tomogr 7:553

    Google Scholar 

  10. Genant HK, Ettinger B, Cann CE, Reiser U (1985) Osteoporosis: Assessment by quantitative computed tomography. Orthop Clin North Am 16:557

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammond CB, Jelovesk FR, Lee KL, Creasman WT, Parken RT (1979) Effects on long-term estrogen replacement therapy. II. Neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 133:537

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hansson T, Roos B (1981) The relation between bone mineral content, experimental compression fractures and disc degeneration. Spine 6:147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holbrook TL, Grazier K, Kelsey JL (1985) The frequency of occurrence, impact and cost of musculoskeletal conditions in the United States. Chicago: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, 1985 quoted in Cummings SR, Kelsey JL, Nevitt MC, O'Dowd KJ (1985) Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Epidemiol Rev 7:178

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jones MM, Francis RM, Nordin BEC (1979) Five year follow-up of estrogen therapy in 94 women. Maturitas 4:123

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krolner B, Nielsen SP (1982) Bone mineral content of the lumbar spine in normal and osteoporotic women: Crossectional and longitudinal studies. Clin Sci 62:329

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindsay R, Hart DM, Forrest WT, Baird C (1980) Prevention of spinal osteoporosis in oophorectomised women. Lancet ii:1151

    Google Scholar 

  17. McBroom RJ, Hayes WC, Edwards WT, Goldberg RP (1985) Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67:1206

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reinbold WD, Genant HK, Reiser UJ, Harris ST (1986) Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal women: Comparison of measurement methods. Radiology 160:469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ringe JD, Kruse HP, Kuhlencordt F (1982) Natriumfluorid und Calcium zur Therapie der primären Osteoporose. Med Klin 77:86

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weaver JK, Chalmers J (1966) Cancellous bone: Its strength and changes with aging and an evaluation of some methods for measuring its mineral content. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 48:289

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by a grant from the Wolfgang Ritter-Stiftung

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biggemann, M., Hilweg, D. & Brinckmann, P. Prediction of the compressive strength of vertebral bodies of the lumbar spine by quantitative computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol 17, 264–269 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401809

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401809

Key words

Navigation