Skip to main content
Log in

Fusion rate after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with carbon fiber implant: 1-year follow-up of 51 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Problems associated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) have traditionally included the need for donor bone, prolonged healing time of donor bone, the difficulty of cutting precise bony channels, the risk of retropulsion of graft, postoperative collapse of the bone graft, and pseudarthrosis. To avoid these problems a carbon fiber reinforced polymer implant cage has been developed to facilitate interbody fusion. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the technical problems and fusion rate associated with this new device for PLIF. Between April 1991 and December 1993, 65 pairs of these implant cages were sold in Sweden. They were traced to six hospitals, where they had been used in the treatment of 51 patients operated on at a total of 65 levels. All PLIF were supplemented with VSP (Variable Screw Placement) instrumentation. All medical records were evaluated and all patients were examined with plain radiographs taken at least 1 year after surgery. If that investigation did not show a clear fusion they were also evaluated with CT (18 patients, 27 levels). No intraoperative problems with the device have been reported; 44 patients (86%) and 58 levels (89%) achieved successful fusion. All patients bar one maintained their immediately obtained postoperative disc height. CT with 1-mm slices and sagittal reconstruction is most helpful if radiographs are difficult to interpret.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berkley LR (1989) A critique of posterior lumbar interbody fusion: 12 years' experience with 250 patients. Surg Neurol 31: 281–289

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blumenthal SL, Gill K (1993) Can lumbar spine radiographs accurately determine fusion in postoperative patients? Correlation of routine radiographs with a second surgical look at lumbar fusions. Spine 18: 1186–1189

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brantigan JW (1994) Pseudarthrosis rate after allograft posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw and plate fixation. Spine 19: 1271–1280

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brantigan JW, Steffee AD (1993) A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Spine 18: 2106–2117

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cloward RB (1981) Spondylolisthesis: treatement by laminectomy and posterior interbody fusion. Review of 100 cases. Clin Orthop 154: 74–82

    Google Scholar 

  6. Collis JS (1985) Total disc replacment: a modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Orthop 193: 64–67

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dennis S, Watkins R, Landaker S, Dillin W, Springer D (1989) Comparison of disc space heights after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 14: 876–878

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hutter CG (1985) Spinal stenosis and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Orthop 193: 103–114

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee CK, Vessa P, Lee JK (1995) Chronic disabling low back pain syndrome caused by internal disc derangements: the results of disc excision and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 20: 356–361

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lin PM, Cautilli RA, Joyce MF (1983) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Orthop 180: 154–168

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meril AJ (1994) Direct current stimulation of allograft in anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Spine 21: 2393–2398

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rothman SLG, Glenn MW (1985) CT evaluation of interbody fusion. Clin Orthop 193: 47–56

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simmons JW (1985) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior ele-ments as chip grafts. Clin Orthop 193: 85–89

    Google Scholar 

  14. Soini Juhani (1994) Lumbar disc space heights after external fixation and anterior interbody fusion: a prospective 2-year follow-up of clinical and radiographic results. J Spinal Disord 7: 487–494

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steffee AD, Brantigan JW (1993) The variable screw placement spinal fixation system. Report of a prospective study of 250 patients enrolled in food and drug administration clinical trials. Spine 18: 1160–1172

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wiltberger BR (1957) The dowel intervertebral-body fusion as used in lumbar-disc surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 39: 284–331

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tullberg, T., Brandt, B., Rydberg, J. et al. Fusion rate after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with carbon fiber implant: 1-year follow-up of 51 patients. Eur Spine J 5, 178–182 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395510

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395510

Key words

Navigation