Skip to main content
Log in

Impression management, overclaiming, and perceived unethical conduct: The role of male and female managers

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the impact of impression management and overclaiming on self-reported ethical conduct of 174 managers (67 male, 107 female) who worked for a large not-for-profit organization. As anticipated, impression management and overclaiming positively influenced perceived unethical conduct of managers. Female managers were more prone to impression management than male managers. There was no significant difference in perceived unethical conduct or level of overclaiming of male and female managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arlow, P. and T. A. Ulrich: 1980, ‘Business Ethics, Social Responsibility and Business Students: An Empiricial Comparison of Clark's Study’, Akron Business and Economic Review 11, 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookhouse, J. K., R. M. Guion and M. E. Doherty: 1966, ‘Social Desirability Response Bias as One Source of the Discrepancy between Subjective Weights and Regression Weights’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37, 316–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, J. M.: 1993, ‘What is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications’, Journal of Applied Psychology 78(1), 98–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, V.: 1966, ‘Personality Characteristics and Social Achievement Behaviors Associated with Children's Social Desirability Response Tendencies’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4, 447–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. R. and M. B. Metzgar: 1992, ‘Towards Candor, Cooperation, and Privacy in Applied Business Ethics Research: The Randomized Research Technique’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2), 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C., J. E. Post and K. Davis: 1992, Business and Society (McGraw Hill, Inc., New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. J.: 1993, ‘Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning’, Journal of Consumer Research 20 (September), 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganster, D. C., H. W. Hennessy and F. Luthans: 1983, ‘Social Desirability Response Effects: Three Alternative Models’, Academy of Management Journal 26(2), 321–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollon, C. J. and T. A. Ulrich: 1979, ‘Personal Business Ethics: Managers vs Managers-To-Be’, Southern Business Review, 5, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1981, The Philosophy of Moral Development (Harper & Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lautenschlager, G. J. and V. L. Flaherty: 1990, ‘Computer Administration of Questions: More Desirable or More Social Desirability?’, Journal of Applied Psychology 75(3), 310–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, W., D. L. Paulhaus, and K. S. Dobson: 1986, ‘Effects of Response Styles on the Report of psychological and Somatic Distress’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(3), 309–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J.: 1968, ‘Personality and Susceptibility to Social influence’, in E. F. Borgatta and W. W. Lambert, ed., Handbook of Personality Theory and Research (Rand McNally, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milham, J.: 1974, ‘Two Components of Need of Approval Score and their Relationship to Cheating Following Success and Failure’, Journal of Research in Personality 8, 378–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L.: 1984, ‘Two-Component Models of Socially Desirable Responding’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltier, D. B. and J. A. Walsh: 1990, ‘An Investigation of Response Bias in the Chapman Scales’, Educational and Psychological Measurement 50, 803–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A. and R. A. Kerin: 1981, ‘The Quality of Self-Report Data: Review and Synthesis’, in B. M. Enis and K. J. Roering eds, Review of Marketing (American Marketing Association, Chicago), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. L. and K. J. Clancy: 1972, ‘Some Effects of “Social Desirability” in Survey Studies’, American Journal of Sociology, 77(5), 921–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M. and A. M. Gibson: 1990, ‘Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 9(6), 457–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M. and M. F. Fernandes: 1991, ‘The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 805–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. C.: 1993, ‘Empiricism in Business Ethics: Suggested Research Directions’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 585–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinette, R. L.: 1991, ‘The Relationship Between the Marlowe-Crowne Form C and the Validity Scales of the MMPI’, Journal of Clinical Psychology 47 (May), 396–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G. E.: 1984, ‘Business Ethics and Social Responsibility: The Response of Present and Future Managers’, Akron Business and Economic Review (fall), 6–11.

  • Tyson, T.: 1990, ‘Believing that Everyone Else is Less Ethical: Implications for Work Behavior and Ethics Instruction’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 715–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, W. J. and D. L. Paulhus: 1987, ‘Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception’, Academy of Management Review 12(2), 250–264.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Peter P. Schoderbek is Professor of Management and Organizations at the University of Iowa. He is the author of six books and many articles on various aspects of management. He has lectured through out the United States, Canada, Japan, and Europe, and has conducted seminars for federal agencies, private corporations, universities, and governments. Much of his work has been in project management and goal setting. His recent interests include strategic policy, business ethics, and compensation.

Satish Deshpande is an Associate Professor of Management at Haworth College of Business, Western Michigan University. He teaches human resource management courses. His current research interests include business ethics, managerial decision-making, and applied psychology in human resource issues. His publications include articles in the Academy of Management Journal, Compensation and Benefits Review, Human Relations, Journal of Small Business Management, and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schoderbek, P.P., Deshpande, S.P. Impression management, overclaiming, and perceived unethical conduct: The role of male and female managers. Journal of Business Ethics 15, 409–414 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380361

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380361

Keywords

Navigation