Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does an optimally foraging oystercatcher obey the functional response?

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. (1)

    We describe an experimental test of the optimal diet model. An oystercatcher was offered bivalves Scrobicularia plana which were buried in the substrate at different depths. All prey were of equal length and thus of equal energy content. Since handling time increased with depth, deep-lying prey were less profitable.

  2. (2)

    From the known increase of handling and search time with depth we were able to predict for each prey density which depth classes should be ignored by the bird so as to maximize its intake rate.

  3. (3)

    The observed depth selection and intake rate were as predicted for the lower prey densities. At high prey densities the observed number of prey taken rose above the predicted intake rate. We suggest that the bird started to ignore closed bivalves with long handling times.

  4. (4)

    The observed relationship between prey density and intake rate could not be described by Holling's type-2 functional response, because the handling time and the rate of discovery were density-related. A multi-species functional response is necessary to describe the intake rate of an optimally feeding predator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: attack strategy of a mantid. Am Nat 110:141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins MD, Ward SA, Dixon AFG (1981) Handling time and the functional response of Aphelinus thomsoni, a predator and parasite of the aphid Drepanosiphum platanoidis. J Anim Ecol 50:479–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook RM, Cockrell BJ (1978) Predator ingestion rate and its bearing on feeding time and the theory of optimal diets. J Anim Ecol 47:529–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson D (1978) Experimental tests of the optimal diet in two social insects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1977) Prey selection and social behaviour in wagtails (Aves: Motacillidae). J Anim Ecol 46:37–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott JM (1983) The responses of the aquatic parasitoid Agriotypus armatus (Hymenoptera: Agriotypidae) to the spatial distribution and density of its caddis host Silo pallipes (Trichoptera: Goeridae). J Anim Ecol 52:315–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Erichsen JT, Krebs JR, Houston AI (1980) Optimal foraging and cryptic prey. J Anim Ecol 49:271–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Feare CJ, Dunnet GM, Patterson IJ (1974) Ecological studies of the rook (Corvus frugilegus L.) in North-East Scotland: Food intake and feeding behaviour. J Appl Ecol 11:867–896

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller PS (1980) The control of handling time and its effects on the foraging strategy of a heteropteran predator, Notonecta. J Anim Ecol 49:699–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss-Custard JD (1977 a) The energetics of prey selection by redshank Tringa totanus (L.), in relation to prey density. J Anim Ecol 46:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss-Custard JD (1977 b) Predator responses and prey mortality in the Redshank Tringa totanus (L.) and a preferred prey Corophium volutator (Pallas). J Anim Ecol 46:21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Green R (1978) Factors affecting the diet of farmland skylarks Alauda arvensis. J Anim Ecol 47:913–928

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, Lawton JH, Beddington JR (1976) The components of arthropod predation. I. The prey death rate. J Anim Ecol 45:135–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, Lawton JH, Beddington JR (1977) Sigmoid functional responses by invertebrate predators and parasitoids. J Anim Ecol 46:249–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes DL, Sisojevic P (1966) Predatory behaviour of Philodromus rufus Walkenaer (Aranea: Thomisidae). Can Ent 98:113–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Ent 91:385–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1966) The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem Entomol Soc Can 48:1–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulscher JB (1974) An experimental study of the food intake of the Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus L. in captivity during the summer. Ardea 62:155–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulscher JB (1976) Localisation of Cockles (Cardium edule L.) by the Oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus L.) in darkness and daylight. Ardea 64:292–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulscher JB (1982) The Oystercatcher as a predator of Macoma. Ardea 70:89–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Stephens DW, Sutherland WJ (1983) Perspectives in optimal foraging. In: Clark GA (ed) Perspectives in Ornithology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 165–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenteren JC van, Bakker K (1976) Functional responses in invertebrates. Neth J Zool 26(4):567–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas JR (1983) The role of foraging time constraints and variable prey encounter in optimal diet choice. Am Nat 122:191–209

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Murton RK (1971) The significance of a specific search image in the feeding behaviour of the Wood-pigeon. Behaviour 40:10–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers JP, Williams SL, Pitelka FA (1980) An experimental analysis of prey availability for Sanderlings (Aves:Scolopacidae) feeding on sandy beach crustaceans. Can J Zool 58:1564–1574

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie NH, Hull CH, Jenkins JG, Steinbrenner K, Bent DH (1975) SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1980) Do chipping sparrows forage optimally? Ardea 68:75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers D (1972) Random search and insect population models. J Anim Ecol 41:369–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (1982) Spatial variation in the predation of cockles by oystercatchers at Traeth Melynog, Anglesey. II. The pattern of mortality. J Anim Ecol 51:491–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen JM (1981) Foraging decisions in starlings (Sturnus vulgaris L.) Ardea 69:1–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser M, Reinders LJ (1981) Waiting time as a new component in functional response models. Neth J Zool 31(2):315–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts L, Drent RH (1981) Prey depletion and regulation of predator density: oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) feeding on mussels (Mytilus edulis). In: Jones NV, Wolff WJ (eds) Feeding and survival strategies of estuarine organisms. Plenum Press, New York, pp 193–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts L, Wanink J (1984) How Oystercatchers and Curlews successively deplete clams. In: Evans PR, Goss-Custard JD, Hale WG (eds) Coastal Waders and Wildfowl in Winter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 69–83

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zoological Laboratory, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 14, 9750 AA, Haren, The Netherlands

    Jan Wanink

  2. Rijksdienst voor de IJsselmeerpolders, P.O. Box 600, 8200 AP, Lelystad, The Netherlands

    Leo Zwarts

Authors
  1. Jan Wanink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leo Zwarts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wanink, J., Zwarts, L. Does an optimally foraging oystercatcher obey the functional response?. Oecologia 67, 98–106 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378457

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378457

Keywords

Search

Navigation