Skip to main content
Log in

The breakdown and decomposition of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) leaf litter in two deciduous woodland soils

I. Breakdown, leaching and decomposition

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Weight losses from sweet chestnut and beech leaves, attributable to biotic and abiotic breakdown processes, leaching and microbial decomposition have been studied using tethered leaves and litter bags. The experimental sites were two adjacent areas of deciduous woodland. In one area (the Castanea site) a mor-like moder humus form has developed under a stand dominated by coppiced chestnut, in the other a mull-like moder underlies a stand of coppiced beech (the Fagus site).

Chestnut leaves in the Castanea site are primarily comminuted by abiotic processes (wind, rain, hygroscopic movements, etc.) and soil animals make a relatively small contribution to leaf litter breakdown. After 31 months in the field 36.03% of the initial weight of chestnut leaves remained in the fine mesh bags against 22.82% in the coarse mesh bags. Weight losses from the coarse and fine mesh bags containing beech litter were not significantly different after 31 months when a mean weight of 57.10% of the litter remained.

In the Fagus site, leaf litter breakdown was mainly due to the feeding activities of earthworms. However, chestnut leaves were more readily selected than beech leaves. After 8 months in the field nearly 45% more chestnut leaf material had been lost from the coarse mesh bags than from the fine mesh bags. Weight losses from the coarse and fine mesh bags containing beech litter were not significantly different after 31 months, when a mean weight of 43.30% of the litter remained.

The leaching and decomposition rates of either type of leaves were not significantly different in the two sites. Chestnut leaves in fine mesh bags lost weight at twice the rate of beech leaves under similar conditions during the first 20 months of the study; however, most of the weight losses from beech and up to 75% of the losses from chestnut were attributable to leaching rather than to microbial decomposition. The rates of weight losses from the chestnut litter in fine mesh bags declined over the last year of the study, but beech maintained approximately constant weight loss rates for 31 months in the field. This difference may be due to different rates at which similar proportions of water soluble materials were leached from the leaves.

A major defect in the litterbag technique is demonstrated. The litter bags maintain the micro-environmental characteristics of the surface litter layers and do not follow the breakdown and decomposition pattern of the leaf litter year class from which the experimental material was drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. M.: Observations on the vertical distribution of Oribatei (Acarina) in two woodland soils. IV. Colloquium Pedobiologiae, C. R. 4ème Coll. Int. Zool. Sol. Ed. I.N.R.A. Paris, 257–272 (1971).

  • Anderson, J. M.: Stand structure and litter fall of a coppiced beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) Woodland. Oikos 24 (1) (1973a).

  • Anderson, J. M.: The breakdown and decomposition of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) leaf litter in two deciduous woodland soils. II. Changes in the carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and polyphenol content. Oecologia 12 275–288 (1973b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, W. V., Norman, A. G.: The threshold moisture content for active decomposition of some mature plant materials. Proc. Soil Sci. Amer. 11, 270–279 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, H. F.: The effect of soil drying on humus decomposition and nitrogen availability. Plant and Soil 10 (1), 9–31 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, O. N.: Statistical methods in biology. London: Longmans, Green 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocock, K. L., Gilbert, O. J. W.: The disappearance of leaf litter under different woodland conditions. Plant and Soil 9 (2), 179–185 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocock, K. L., Gilbert, O., Capstick, C. K., Twinn, D. C., Waid, J. S., Woodman, M. J.: Changes in leaf litter when placed on the surface of soils with contrasting humus types. J. Soil Sci. 11 (1), 1–9 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornebusch, C. H.: The fauna of forest soil. Forstl. Forsøgsv. Danm. 8, 1–224 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burges, A.: The decomposition of organic matter in the soil. In: Soil biology, A. Burges, F. Raw, Eds, p. 479–492. London-New York: Academic Press 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, F. E.: Bacteria in soil. In: Soil biology, A. Burges, F. Raw, Eds., p. 15–47. London-New York: Academic Press 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, D. A., Hoglund, M. P.: A litter bag method for the study of microarthropods inhabitating leaf litter. Ecology 43 (3), 571–573 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drift, J. van der, Witkamp, M.: The significance of the breakdown of oak litter by Eniocyla pusilla Burm. Arch. néerl. Zool. 13, 486–492 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunger, W.: Über die Veränderung des Fallaubes im Darm von Bodentieren. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Düng. Bodenk. 82, 174–193 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, G. W., Arnold, M. K.: Studies in leaf litter breakdown: II. Breakdown rate of sun and shade leaves. Pedobiologia 6, 238–243 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, G. W., Edwards, C. A., Arnold, M. K.: Some methods for assessing the activity of soil animals in the breakdown of leaves. Pedobiologia 4, 80–87 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny, H., Gessel, S. P., Bingham, F. T.: Comparative study of decomposition rates of organic matter in temperate and tropical regions. Soil Sci. 68, 419–432 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevan, D. K. McE.: Soil fauna and humus formation. Trans. 9th Int. Cong. Soil Sci. 2, 1–10 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubiena, W. L.: The soils of Europe. London: Thomas Murby 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen, A.: Metabolism of soil invertebrates in relation to soil fertility. Ann. appl. Biol. 49, 215–218 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen, A.: The contribution of the microfauna to total soil metabolism. In: Soil organisms, J. Doeksen, J. van der Drift, Eds., p. 3–16. Amsterdam: North Holland 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minderman, G.: Addition, decomposition and accumulation of organic matter in forests. J. Ecol. 56, 355–362 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, P. B., Bocock, K. L., Heal, O. W.: Studies on the decomposition of the faecal pellets of a millipede [Glomeris marginata (Villiers)]. J. Ecol. 54, 755–766 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykvist, M.: Leaching and decomposition of litter. III. Experiments on leaf litter of Betula verrucosa. Oikos 12 (2), 2, 249–263 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. S.: Energy storage and the balance of the producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecol. 44 (2), 327–332 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, T.: Microbiological decomposition of beech litter. Ecol. Rev. 14 (2), 141–147 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreven, D. A. van: The effect of intermittent drying and wetting of a calcareous soil on carbon and nitrogen mineralisation. Plant and Soil 26 (1), 14–32 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, R. E., Olson, J. S.: First-year breakdown of leaf litter in southern Appalachian forests. Science 134 (3473), 194–195 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J.: Biometry. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulides, D. A., Allison, F. E.: Effects of drying and freezing soils on carbon dioxide production, available mineral nutrients, aggregation and bacterial populations. Soil Sci. 91, 291–298 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, J. L.: Some observations on the microbial activity in remoistened air-dried soils. Plant and Soil 8, 2, 170–182 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkamp, M.: Microbial populations of leaf litter in relation to environmental conditions and decomposition. Ecology 44 (2), 370–377 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkamp, M.: Environmental influences on microbial populations and activity of the forest floor. 8th Int. Cong. of Soil Sci., Bucharest, Rumania (1964).

  • Witkamp, M.: Assessment of microbial immobilisation of mineral elements. Soil Biology, 36–37 (1967).

  • Witkamp, M.: Environmental effects on microbial. turnover of some mineral elements. I. Abiotic factors. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 1, 167–176 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkamp, M., Crossley, D. A.: The role of arthropods and microflora in breakdown of white oak litter. Pedobiologia 6, 293–303 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkamp, M., Drift, J. van der: Breakdown of forest litter in relation to environmental factors. Plant and Soil 15 (4), 295–311 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkamp, M., Olson, J.: Breakdown of confined and non-confined oak litter. Oikos 14, II, 138–147 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, J.M. The breakdown and decomposition of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) leaf litter in two deciduous woodland soils. Oecologia 12, 251–274 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347566

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347566

Keywords

Navigation