Slant-tilt: The visual encoding of surface orientation
Cite this article as: Stevens, K.A. Biol. Cybern. (1983) 46: 183. doi:10.1007/BF00336800 Abstract
A specific form for the internal representation of local surface orientation is proposed, which is similar to Gibson's (1950) “amount and direction of slant”. Slant amount is usually quantifed by the angle σ between the surface normal and the line of sight (0°≦σ≦90°). Slant direction corresponds to the direction of the gradient of distance from the viewer to the surface, and may be defined by the image direction τ to which the surface normal would project (0°≦τ≦360°). Since the direction of slant is specified by the tilt of the projected surface normal, it is referred to as surface tilt (Stevens, 1979; Marr, 1982). The two degrees of freedom of orientation are therefore quantified by slant, an angle measured perpendicular to the image plane, and tilt, an angle measured in the image plane. The slanttilt form provides several computational advantages relative to some other proposals and is consistent with various psychological phenomena. Slant might be encoded by various means, e.g. by the cosine of the angle, by the tangent, or linearly by the angle itself. Experimental results are reported that suggest that slant is encoded by an internal parameter that varies linearly with slant angle, with resolution of roughly one part in 100. Thus we propose that surface orientation is encoded in human vision by two quantities, one varying linearly with slant angle, the other varying linearly with tilt angle.
Attneave, F.: Representation of physical space. In: Coding processes in human memory, Melton, A.W., Martin, E. eds., New York: Wiley 1972
Attneave, F., Frost, R.: The determination of perceived tridimensional orientation by minimum criteria. Percep. Psychophys.
, 391–396 (1969)
Balch, W., Milewski, A., Yonas, A.: Mechanisms underlying the slant aftereffect, Percept. Psychophys.
, 581–585 (1977)
Bergman, R., Gibson, J.J.: The negative after-effect of the perception of a surface slanted in the third dimension. Am. J. Psychol.
, 364–374 (1959)
Clark, W.C., Smith, A.H., Rabe, A.: The interaction of surface texture, outline gradient, and in the perception of slant. Can. J. Psychol.
, 1–8 (1956)
Flock, H.R.: Optical texture and linear perspective as stimuli for slant perception. Psychol. Rev.
, 505–514 (1965)
Flock, H.R., Graves, D., Tenney, J., Stephenson, B.: Slant judgments of single rectangles at a slant. Psychon. Sci.
, 57–58 (1967)
Foley, J.M.: The size distance relation and intrinsic geometry of visual space: implications for processing. Vision Res.
, 323–332 (1972)
Gibson, J.J.: The perception of visual surfaces. Am. J. Psychol.
, 367–384 (1950)
Gibson, J.J.: The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin 1966
Gordon, D.A.: Static and dynamic visual fields in human space perception. J. Opt. Soc. Am.
, 1296–1303 (1965)
Gregory, R.L.: The intellignet eye. New York: McGraw-Hill 1970
Helmholtz, H.L.F. von: Treatise on physiological optics. Transl. by J.P. Southall, New York: Dover Publications 1925
Hoffman, D.D.: Interring local surface orientation from motion fields. J. Opt. Soc. Am.
Horn, B.K.P.: Obtaining shape from shading information. In: The psychology of computer vision, Winston, P.H. ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 1975
Kaiser, P.K.: Perceived shape and its dependency on perceived slant. J. Exp. Psychol.
, 345–353 (1967)
Koenderink, J.J., van Doorn, A.J.: Local structure of movement parallax of the plane. J. Opt. Soc. Am.
, 717–723 (1976)
Kohler, W., Emery, D.: Figural aftereffects in the third dimension of visual space. Am. J. Psychol.
, 159–201 (1947)
Kraft, A.L., Winnick, W.A.: The effect of pattern and texture gradient on slant and shape judgments. Percept. Psychophys.
, 141–147 (1967)
Longuet-Higgins, H.C., Prazdny, K.: The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B.
, 385–397 (1980)
Mackworth, A.K.: Interpreting pictures of polyhedral scenes. Art. Intell.
, 121–137 (1973)
Marr, D.: Early processing of visual information. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B
, 483–524 (1976)
Marr, D.: Representing visual information. AAAS 143rd Annual Meeting, Symposium on Some Mathematical Questions in Biology, February. In: Lectures in the Life Sciences
10, 101–180 (1978)
Marr, D.: Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Franscisco: Freeman 1982
Marr, D., Hildreth, E.: Theory of edge detection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B
, 187–217 (1980)
Marr, D., Poggio, T.: From understanding computation to under-standing neural circuitry. Neurosci. Res. Prog. Bull.
, 470–488 (1977)
Marr, D., Nishihara, K.: Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B.
, 269–294 (1978)
Nakayama, K., Loomis, J.M.: Optical velocity patterns, velocitysensitive neurons, and space perception: a hypothesis. Perception
, 63–80 (1974)
Olson, R.K.: Slant judgments from static and rotating trapezoids correspond to rules of perspective geometry. Percept. Psychophys.
, 509–516 (1974)
Prazdny, K.: Egomotion and relative depth map from optical flow. Biol. Cybern.
, 87–102 (1980)
Purdy, W.C.: The hypothesis of psychophysical correspondence in space perception. General Electric Technical Information Series, No. R60 ELC 56 (1960)
Richards, W.. Visual space perception. In: Handbook of perception, Vol. V. Carterette, E.C., Friedman, M.P. eds. New York: Academic Press 1975
Smith, A.H.: Interaction of form and exposure time in the perception of slant. Percpet. Motor Skills
, 481–490 (1965)
Stevens, K.A.: Representing and analyzing surface orientation. In: Artificial intelligence: an MIT perspective. Winston, P.H., Brown, R.H. eds. Cambridge: MIT Press 1979
Stevens, K.A.: The visual interpretation of surface contours. Art. Intell.
, 47–73 (1981)
Stevens, K.A.: The information content of texture gradients. Biol. Cybern.
, 95–105 (1981)
Stevens, K.A.: Surface tilt (the direction of slant): a neglected psychophysical variable. Percep. Psychophys. (in press)
Ullman, S.: The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1979
Witkin, A.P.: Estimating shape from texture. Art. Intell.
, 17–45 (1981)
Youngs, W.M.: The influence of perspective and disparity cues on the perception of slant. Vision Res.
, 79–82 (1976)