Skip to main content
Log in

Ovule pre-emption and pollen limitation in a self-fertile perennial herb (Blandfordia grandiflora, Liliaceae)

Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extent, frequency and causes of pollenlimited seed production were examined in partially selffertile populations of Blandfordia grandiflora for 2 years. Percentage seed set of open-pollinated plants (50–57%) did not differ within or between years, and was about 19% less than experimentally cross-pollinated plants (70–75%). Floral visits by honeybees did not differ through the flowering season and the number of pollen grains deposited on stigmas within 12 h of flowers opening exceeded the number of ovules per flower, indicating that the quality rather than the quantity of pollination limited seed set. Pollen limitation was caused by concurrent self- and cross-pollination and the subsequent abortion of some selfed ovules due to inbreeding depression. Natural seed set (55%) was intermediate between selfed (43%) and crossed (75%) flowers and was not increased when flowers that had been available to pollinators for 24 h were hand cross-pollinated, suggesting that ovules were already fertilized. Similarly, experimental pollination with both cross and self pollen within 24 h of flowers opening did not increase seed set relative to natural seed set, indicating that both cross- and self-fertilizations had occurred. In contrast, when selfing followed crossing by 48 h, or vice versa, seed set did not differ from crossed-only or selfed-only flowers, respectively, indicating that ovules were pre-empted by the first pollination. Collectively, these results indicate that under natural conditions self pollen pre-empts ovules, rendering them unavailable for cross-fertilization. This selfing reduces fecundity by 50%, as estimated from the natural production of cross seeds when selfing was prevented. Consequently, selection should favour floral traits, such as increased stigma-anther separation or protandry, that reduce interference between male and female functions that leads to selfing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman JD, Montalvo AM (1990) Short- and long-term limitations to fruit production in a tropical orchid. Ecology 71: 263–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Charlesworth D (1991) Effect of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352: 522–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennington CC, Thayne WV (1994) Use and misuse of mixed model analysis of variance in ecological studies. Ecology 75: 717–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Broyles SB, Wyatt R (1993) The consequences of self-pollination in Asclepias exaltata, a self-incompatible milkweed. Am J Bot 80: 41–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Burd M (1994) Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot Rev 60: 83–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo RN (1993) Evolutionary demography of orchids: intensity and frequency of pollination and the cost of fruiting. Ecology 74: 1033–1042

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR, Waser NM, Price MV (1994) Indirect selection of stigma position in Ipomopsis aggregata via a genetically correlated trait. Evolution 48: 55–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18: 237–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruzan MB, Barrett SCH (1993) Contribution of cryptic in compatibility to the mating system of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 74: 925–934

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong TJ, Waser NM, Price MV, Ring RM (1992) Plant size, geitonogamy and seed set in Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 89: 310–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Epperson BK, Clegg MT (1987) First-pollination primacy and pollen selection in the morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea. Heredity 58: 5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen C, Gregory T, Galloway LF (1989) Costs of self-pollination in a self-compatible plant, Polemonium viscosum. Am J Bot 76: 1675–1680

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig D, Westoby M (1988) On limits to seed production. Am Nat 131: 757–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtsford TP, Ellstand NC (1992) Genetic and environmental variation in floral traits affecting outcrossing rate in Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae). Evolution 46: 216–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz CC, Schemske DW (1988) Demographic cost of reproduction in a neotropical herb: an experimental field study. Ecology 69: 1741–1745

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennersten O (1988) Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conserv Biol 2: 359–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennersten O (1991) Cost of reproduction in Viscaria vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae): a field experiment. Oikos 61: 197–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston MO (1991) Pollen limitation of female reproduction in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphitica. Ecology 72: 1500–1503

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston MO (1993) Tests of two hypotheses concerning pollen competition in a self-compatible, long-styled species (Lobelia cardinalis: Lobeliaceae). Am J Bot 80: 1400–1406

    Google Scholar 

  • Karoly K (1992) Pollinator limitation in the facultatively autogamous annual, Lupinus nanus (Leguminosae). Am J Bot 79: 49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence WS (1993) Resource and pollen limitation: plant size-dependent reproductive patterns in Physalis longifolia. Am Nat 141: 296–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1989) Inbreeding depression in partially self-fertilizing Phlox. Evolution 43: 1417–1423

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG (1992) Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. Int J Plant Sci 153: 370–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG, Schoen DJ (1992) Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. Int J Plant Sci 153: 358–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG, Webb CJ (1986) The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. NZ J Bot 24: 135–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockendon DJ, Currah L (1977) Self-pollen reduces the number of cross-pollen tubes in the styles of Brassica oleracea L. New Phytol 78: 675–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Hall P (1990) Costs of reproduction in the pink lady's slipper orchid: a four-year experimental study. Am Nat 136: 638–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey M (1993) Floral morphology, biology and sex allocation in disjunct populations of Christmas bells (Blandfordia grandiflora, Liliaceae) with different breeding systems. Aust J Bot 41: 749–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey M (1995) Causes and consequences of seasonal variation in pollen limitation of seed production in Blandfordia grandiflora (Liliaceae). Oikos 72: (in press)

  • Ramsey M, Prakash N, Cairns S (1993) Breeding systems of disjunct populations of Christmas bells (Blandfordia grandiflora R. Br., Liliaceae): variation in self-fertility and an ovular mechanism regulating self-fertilisation. Aust J Bot 41: 35–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey M, Cairns S, Vaughton G (1994) Geographic variation in morphological and reproductive characters of coastal and tableland populations of Blandfordia grandiflora, Liliaceae. Plant Syst Evol 192: 215–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Reekie EG, FA Bazzaz (1987) Reproductive effort in plants. 3. Effect of reproduction on vegetative activity. Am Nat 129: 907–919

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen DJ (1982) The breeding system of Gilia achilleifolia: variation in floral characteristics and outerossing rate. Evolution 36: 352–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Seavy SR, Bawa KS (1986) Late-acting self-incompatibility in angiosperms. Bot Rev 52: 195–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Baltus MS (1987) Patch size, pollinator behaviour, and pollinator limitation in catnip. Ecology: 68: 1679–1690

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow AA, Whigham DF (1989) Costs of flower and fruit production in Tipularia discolor (Orchidaceae). Ecology 70: 1286–1293

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry 2nd edn. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland S (1987) Why hermaphroditic plants produce many more flowers than fruits: experimental tests with Agave mekelveyana. Evolution 41: 750–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughton G (1991) Variation between years in pollen and nutrient limitation of fruit-set in Banksia spinulosa. J Ecol 79: 389–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughton G, Ramsey M (1994) Pollinators and seed production. In: Kigel J, Galili G (eds) Seed development and germination. Dekker, New York, pp. 475–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh NE, Charlesworth D (1992) Evolutionary interpretations of differences in pollen tube growth rates. Q Rev Biol 67: 19–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Price MV (1991) Reproductive costs of self-pollination in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae): are ovules usurped? Am J Bot 78: 1036–1043

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb CJ, Lloyd DG (1986) The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. II. Herkogamy. NZ J Bot 24: 135–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson P, Thomson JD, Stanton ML, Rigney LP (1994) Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination success. Am Nat 143: 283–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM (1991) Statistical principles in experimental design, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M, Pyke GH (1988) Reproduction in Polemonium: assessing the factors limiting seed set. Am Nat 131: 723–738

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramsey, M. Ovule pre-emption and pollen limitation in a self-fertile perennial herb (Blandfordia grandiflora, Liliaceae). Oecologia 103, 101–108 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328430

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328430

Key words

Navigation