Skip to main content
Log in

A trade-off between scale and precision in resource foraging

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

There is widespread uncertainty about the nature and role of morphological plasticity in resource competition in plant communities. We have assayed the foraging characteristics of leaf canopies and root systems of eight herbaceous plants of contrasted ecology using new techniques to create controlled patchiness in light and mineral nutrient supply. The results are compared with those of a conventional competition experiment. Measurements of dry matter partitioning and growth in patchy conditions indicate a consistent positive association between the foraging characteristics of roots and shoots, supporting the hypothesis of strong interdependence of competitive abilities for light and mineral nutrients. Differences are identified in the abilities of dominant and subordinate plants to forage on coarse and fine scalcs. It is suggested that a trade-off exists in the scale (“high” in dominants) and precision (high in subordinates) with which resources are intercepted and that this trade-off contributes to diversity in communities of competing plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aung LG (1974) Root-shoot relationships. In: Carson EW (ed) The Plant Root and its Environment. University Press, Virginia, pp 29–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat KKS, Nye PH (1973) Diffusion of phosphate to plant roots in soil. 1. Quantitative autoradiography of the depletion zone. Plant Soil 38:161–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom AJ, Chapin FS, Mooney HA (1985) Resource limitation in plants-an economic analogy. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16:363–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell BD, Grime JP (1989a) A new method of exposing developing root systems to controlled patchiness in mineral nutrient supply. Ann Bot 63:395–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell BD, Grime JP (1989b) A comparative study of plant responsiveness to the duration of episodes of mineral nutrient enrichment. New Phytol 112:261–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clapham AR, Tutin TG, Warburg EF (1981) Excursion Flora of the British Isles. 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson DT (1967) Phosphorus supply and growth rate in species ofAgrostis L. J Ecol 55:111–118

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crick JC, Grime JP (1987) Morphological plasticity and mineral nutrient capture in two herbaceous species of contrasted ecology. New Phytol 107:403–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald CM (1958) The interaction of competition for light and for nutrients. Aust J Agric Res 9:421–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew MC (1975) Comparison of the effect of a localized supply of phosphate, nitrate, ammonium and potassium on the growth of the seminal root system and the shoot in barley. New Phytol 75:479–490

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drew MC, Saker LR, Ashley TW (1973) Nutrient supply and the growth of the seminal root system in barley. III. The effect of nitrate concentration on the growth of axes and laterals. J Exp Bot 24:1189–1202

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Field C, Mooney HA (1986) The photosynthesis-nitrogen relationship in wild plants. In: Givnish TV (ed) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 25–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitter AH, Ashmore CJ (1974) Response ofVeronica species to a simulated woodland light climate. New Phytol 73:997–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitter AH, Hay RKM (1987) Environmental Physiology of Plants. Academic Press, London, p 423

    Google Scholar 

  • Givnish TJ (1982) On the adaptive significance of leaf height in forest herbs. Am Nat 120:353–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givnish TJ (1986) Biomechanical constraints on crown geometry in forest herbs. In: Givnish TJ (ed) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 525–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Glecson SK, Tilman D (1990) Allocation and the transient dynamics of succession on poor soils. Ecology 71:1144–1155

    Google Scholar 

  • Granato TC, Raper CD (1989) Proliferation of Maize (Zea mays L.) roots in response to localised supply of nitrate. J Exp Bot 40:263–275

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1966) Shade avoidance and shade tolerance in flowering plants. In: Bainbridge R, Evans GC, Rackham O (eds) Light as an Ecological Factor. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, pp 187–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1973) Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242:344–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1974) Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature 250:26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:1169–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, p 222

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1987) Dominant and subordinate components of plant communities: implications for succession, stability and diversity. In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ, Edwards JP (eds) Colonization, Succession and Stability. Blackwell Oxford, pp 413–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Crick JC, Rincon JE (1986) The ecological significance of plasticity. In: Jennings DH, Trewavas A (eds) Plasticity in Plants. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge pp 7–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Hunt R (1976) Relative growth rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. J Ecol 63:393–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb PJ (1985) Plant populations and vegetation in relation to habitat, disturbance and competition: problems of generalization. In: White J, Beeftink J (eds) The Population Structure of Vegetation. Dr W. Junk, Dordrecht, pp 595–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt EJ (1966) Sand and Water Culture Methods used in the Study of Plant Nutrition, 2nd Edition. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux Technical Communication No. 22, East Malling, Kent, p 547

  • Higgs DE, James DB (1969) Comparative studies on the biology of upland grasses. I. Rate of dry-matter production and its control in four grass species. J Ecol 57:443–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA, Smith TM (1987) Plant succession Life history and competition. Am Nat 130:168–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings MJ (1988) Differential foraging for resources and structural plasticity in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 3:200–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa Y, Roughgarden J (1984) Shoot/root balance of plants: optimal growth of a system with many vegetative organs. Theor Popul Biol 25:78–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Caldwell MM (1989) The timing and degree of root proliferation in fertile-soil microsites for three cold-desert perennials. Oecologia 81:149–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer RHM (1979) How grasses grow. Second Edition. Arnold, London, p 66

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon TA (1973) Shape and size in biology. Science 179:1202–1204

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud A, Grime JP (1976) An analysis of competitive ability in three perennial grasses. New Phytol 77:431–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman EI (1973) Competition and diversity in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 244:310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye PH (1966) The effect, of nutrient intensity and buffering power of a soil, and the absorbing power, size and root hairs of a root, on nutrient absorption by diffusion. Plant Soil 25:81–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nye PH (1969) The soil model and its application to plant nutrition. In: Rorison IH (ed) Ecological Aspects of the Mineral Nutrition of Plants, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 105–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Olff H, van Andel J, Bakker JP (1990) Biomass and shoot/root allocation of five species from a grassland succession series at different combinations of light and nutrient supply. Funct Ecol 4:193–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader RJ, Best BJ (1989) Variation in competition along an environmental gradient:Hieracium floribundum in an abandoned pasture. J Ecol 77:673–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley B, Peters RH (1990) A test of the Tilman model of plant strategies: relative growth rate and biomass partitioning. Am Nat 136:139–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade AJ, Hutchings MJ (1987a) The effects of nutrient availability on foraging in the clonal herbGlechoma hederacea J Ecol 75:95–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade AJ, Hutchings MJ (1987b) Clonal integration and plasticity in foraging behaviour inGlechoma hederacea. J Ecol 75:1023–1036

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith H, Morgan DC (1981) The spectral characteristics of the visible radiation incident upon the surface of the earth. In: Smith H (ed) Plants and the Daylight Spectrum. Academic Press, New York, pp 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern WR (1965) The effect of density on the performance of individual plants in subterranean clover swards. Aust J Agric Res 16:541–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ, Stillman RA (1988) The foraging tactics of plants. Oikos 52:239–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1987) On the meaning of competition and the mechanisms of competitive superiority. Funct Ecol 1:304–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1988) Plant Strategies and the Structure and Dynamics of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1989) Competition, nutrient reduction and the competitive neighbourhood of a bunchgrass. Funct Ecol 3:215–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Cowan ML (1989) Growth of old field herbs on a nitrogen gradient. Funct Ecol 3:425–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum LK (1958) Density of root branching as affected by substrate and separate ions. Acta Bot Neerl 7:174–190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campbell, B.D., Grime, J.P. & Mackey, J.M.L. A trade-off between scale and precision in resource foraging. Oecologia 87, 532–538 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320417

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320417

Key words

Navigation