Skip to main content
Log in

Cursorial spiders and succession: age or habitat structure?

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The structure of cursorial spider assemblages was examined along a gradient of four temperature successional communities. Species diversity (H′), richness (S), and evenness (J′) exhibited a dichotomy between herbaceous and woody communities rather than a progressive change with community age: all three parameters were higher in the two younger fields than in the two older woodlands, which is contrary to conventional successional theory. Species importance curves were steeper in the two woody communities. The breadth of the distribution of adult body lengths was greater in the two herbaceous communities. Indices of community similarity revealed neither a successional trend nor the vegetative dichotomy. We suggest the hypothesis that habitat structure is a more important determinant of cursorial spider diversity than successional age per se, and that the switch in dominance from herbaceous to woody vegetation is the critical change. We further suggest that competition for prey is more important to cursorial spiders in early successional (herbaceous) communities, because of a switch in the limiting resource from prey in these communities to the amount of accumulating litter (a spatial resource) in older woody stands. This may explain the greater variation in adult body size of these generalist predators in the two younger communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernays E, Graham M (1988) On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods. Ecology 69:886–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown VK (1982) The phytophagous insect community and its impact on early successional habitats. pp 205–213 in Visser JH, Minks AK (eds) Proc 5th Int Symp Insect-plant Rel

  • Brown VK (1985) Insect herbivores and plant succession. Oikos 44:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Bultman TL, Uetz GW (1982) Abundance and community structure of forest floor spiders following litter manipulation. Oecologia 55:34–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Bultman TL, Uetz GW (1984) Effect of structure and nutritional quality of litter on abundances of litter-dwelling arthropods. Am Midl Natur 111:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Bultman TL, Uetz GW, Brady AR (1982) A comparison of cursorial spider communities along a successional gradient. J Arachnol 10:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiverton PA (1986) Predator density manipulation and its effects on populations of Rhodopalosiphum padi (Homoptera: Aphididae) in spring barley. Ann Appl Biol 109:49–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 111:1119–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell HV, Hurd LE, Lotrich VA (1976) A measure of response to perturbation used to assess structural change in some polluted and unpolluted stream fish communities. Oecologia 23:335–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton C (1927) Animal ecology. McMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan WF, Hurd LE (1991) Direct and indirect effects of generalist predators on a terrestrial arthropod community. Am Midl Nat 126:380–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone MH (1984) Determinants of web spider species diversity: vegetation structural diversity vs. prey availability. Oecologia 62:299–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston NG, Smith FE, Slobodkin LB (1960) Community structure, population control, and competition. Am Natur 94:421–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notion and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd LE (1988) Consequences of divergent egg phenology to predation and coexistence in two sympatric, congeneric mantids (Orthoptera: Mantidae). Oecologia 76:549–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd LE, Eisenberg RM (1990) Arthropod community responses to manipulation of a bitrophic predator guild. Ecology 71:2107–2114

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am Nat 93:145–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlson RH, Hurd LE (1992) Disturbance, coral reef communities, and changing ecological paradigms. Coral Reefs (in press)

  • Lawton JH, Strong DR (1981) Community patterns and competition in folivorous insects. Am Natur 118:317–338

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ, Wolf LL (1979) General ecology 2nd ed. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1966) Species-diversity and pattern-diversity in the study of ecological succession. J Theor Biol 10:370–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1976) Population and community ecology: principles and methods. Gordon and Breach, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE, Bishop L (1990) Prey control by an assemblage of generalist predators: spiders in garden test systems. Ecology 71:1441–1450

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1965) The evolution of bill size differences among sympatric congeneric species of birds. Evolution 19:189–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW, Toft CA (1983) Spider populations: extraordinarily high densities on islands without top predators. Science 219:1353–1355

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon and Weaver (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. Univ Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelford VE (1970) Preliminary notes on the distribution of the tiger beetles (Cicindela) and its relation to plant succession. Biol Bull 14:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Boecklen W (1981) Santa Rosalia reconsidered: size ratios and competition. Evolution 35:1206–1228

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR, Simberloff D (1981) Straining at gnats and swallowing ratios: character displacement. Evolution 35:810–812

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW (1976) Gradient analysis of spider communities in a streamside forest. Oecologia 22:373–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GA (1977) Coexistence in a guild of wandering spiders. J Anim Ecol 46:531–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW (1979) The influence of variation in litter habitats on spider communities. Oecologia 40:29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW, Unzicker JD (1976) Pitfall trapping in ecological studies of wandering spiders. J Arachnol 3:101–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hook RI, Jr (1971) Energy and nutrient dynamics of spider and orthopteran populations in a grassland ecosystem. Ecol Monogr 41:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise DH (1984) The role of competition in spider communities: insights from field experiments with a model organism. pp. 42–53 in Strong DR, Simberloff D, Abele LG, Thistle AB (eds) Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hurd, L.E., Fagan, W.F. Cursorial spiders and succession: age or habitat structure?. Oecologia 92, 215–221 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317367

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317367

Key words

Navigation