Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive functioning and anxiety

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Various possible differences in cognitive functioning between those high and low in trait anxiety are considered. Particular emphasis is paid to the hypothesis that individuals high in trait anxiety tend to approach threatening stimuli, whereas those low in trait anxiety tend to avoid such stimuli. The evidence indicates that there are such differences in the processing of threatening stimuli as a function of trait anxiety. However, these differences are found only under certain conditions, for example, when threatening and nonthreatening stimuli are presented concurrently, and when minor rather than major threat is involved.

The differences between those high and low in trait anxiety encompass pre-attentive, attentional, and interpretative mechanisms. As a consequence, any adequate theory of trait anxiety must take proper account of cognitive mechanisms and functioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 8. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitterman, M. E., & Kniffin, C. W. (1953). Manifest anxiety and “perceptual defense”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 248–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaylock, B. A. H. (1963). Repression-sensitization, word association responses, and incidental recall. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Texas, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behavior Research & Therapy, 5, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1964). Repression-sensitization as a dimension of personality. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, D. (1972). Repression-sensitization and duration of visual attention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34, 949–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffenbacher, J. L. (1978). Worry, emotionality, and task-generated interference in test anxiety: An empirical test of attentional theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 248–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, N. F. (1981). Preconscious processing. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornic, S., & Fernaeus, S.-E. (1981). Individual differences in high-load tasks: The effect of verbal distraction (Rep. No. 569). Stockholm: Department of Psychology, University of Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W. (1979). Anxiety, learning, and memory: A reconceptualization. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 363–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W. (1982). Attention and arousal: Cognition and performance. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck's theory of personality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for personality. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, M. (1956). Manifest anxiety and tachistoscopic recognition of facial photographs. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 6, 245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, J. N. (1973). Approach-avoidance reactions by repressors and sensitizers to ambiguity in a structured free-association task. Psychological Reports, 33, 97–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewinsohn, P. M., Berquist, W. H., & Brelje, T. (1972). The repression-sensitization dimension and emotional response to stimuli. Psychological Reports, 31, 707–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1986). Discrimination of threat cues without awareness in anxiety state. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D., & Margalit, B. (1983). Allocation of attention according to informativeness in visual recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 497–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seamon, J. G., Marsh, R. L., & Brody, N. (1984). Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 465–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. B. (1984). Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 316–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1977). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Form Y-1. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempone, V. J. (1962). Extension of the repression-sensitization hypothesis to success and failure experience. Psychological Reports, 15, 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann, L. P. (1962). An empirically derived MMPI scale which measures facilitation-inhibition of recognition of threatening stimuli. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18, 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Egeren, L. (1968). Repression and sensitization: Sensitivity and recognition criteria. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 3, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, G. F. (1974). The effects of repression-sensitization on a brightness scaling measure of perceptual defence. British Journal of Psychology, 65, 395–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wine, J. (1971). Test anxiety and direction of attention. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 92–104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eysenck, M.W., MacLeod, C. & Mathews, A. Cognitive functioning and anxiety. Psychol. Res 49, 189–195 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308686

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308686

Keywords

Navigation