Abstract
Data from a large survey of federal employees is utilized to compare three broad competing perspectives that suggest effects on sexual harassment within organizations. Three different viewpoints stress power differentials, minority status, and diffuse master status characteristics. Results of the study indicate that intraorganizational theories emphasizing either power inequalities or work group compositional heterogeneities are unable to account for the reported sexual harassment without considering diffuse master status characteristics developed and maintained outside the organization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Backhouse, C., & Cohen L. Sexual harassment on the job: How to avoid the working woman's nightmare. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1981.
Benson, D. J., & Thompson, G. E. Sexual harassment on a university campus: The confluence of authority relations, sexual interest and gender stratification. Unpublished research paper, Berkeley: University of California, 1979.
Blau, P. M. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: The Free Press, 1977.
Bularzik, M. Sexual harassment at the workplace: historical notes. Reprinted in pamphlet from Radical American, MA: New England Free Press, July–August, 1978.
Carey, S. H. Sexual politics in business. Unpublished research paper, San Antonio: University of Texas at San Antonio, 1977.
Coles, F. S. Forced to quit: Sexual harassment complaints and agency response. Sex Roles, 1986, 14, 81–95.
Collins, R. A. Conflict theory of sexual stratification. Social Problems, 1971, 1–20.
Collins, R. Conflict sociology: Toward an explanatory science. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Crull, P. The impact of sexual harassment on the job: A profile of the experiences of 92 women. In D. Neugarten & J. Shafritz. (eds.), Sexuality in organizations: Romantic and coercive behaviors at work. Oak Park, IL: Moore Publishing Co., 1980.
Crocker, P. L. An analysis of university definitions of sexual harassment. Signs, 1983, 696–707.
Dixon, W. J., (ed.). BMB: Biomedical computer programs. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.
Eskilson, A., & Wiley, M. G. Sex composition and leadership in small groups. Sociometry, 1976, 183–194.
Farley, L. Sexual shakedown: The sexual harassment of women on the job. San Francisco: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1978.
Finigan, M. The effects of token representation on participation in small groups and decision making groups. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 1982, 531–550.
Gillespie, D. L., Leffler, A., Anderton, T., & Collis, C. Sexism, sex, and power: Sexual harassment in the workplace. Unpublished paper delivered at the American Sociological Association meetings, San Francisco, CA, 1982.
Ginsberg, G., Koreski, J., & Galloway, J. Sexual advances by an employee's supervisor: A sex discrimination violation of Title VII? Employee Relations Law Journal, 1977, 83–93.
Goodman, L. A. Criteria of determining whether certain categories in a cross-classification table should be combined, with special reference to occupational categories in an occupational mobility table. American Journal of Sociology, 1981, 612–650.
Gruber, J. & Bjorn, L. Blue-collar blues: The sexual harassment of women workers. Work and Occupations, 1982, 271–298.
Hartmann, H. I. The family as the locus of gender, class, and political struggle: The example of housework. Signs, 1981, 366–394.
Henley, N. M. Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1977.
Israeli, D. N. Sex effects or structural effects? An empirical test of Kanter's theory of proportions. Social Forces, 1983, 153–165.
Kanter, R. M. Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 965–990.
MacKinnon, C. A. Sexual harassment of working women. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979.
Miller, G. A., Anderton, D. L., & Conaty, J. Assessing the samples of prior organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 1985, 369–383.
Morewitz, S. J. The sexual harassment of working women. Paper delivered at the American Sociological Association meetings, Toronto, 1981.
New Responses, Inc. Sexual harassment in the federal government. Hearing before the subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service, U.S. House of Representatives, 96th Congress, 1st Session, October 23, 1979. Published Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Ofice, 1980.
Powell, G. N. Effects of sex role identity and sex on definitions of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 1986, 14, 9–19.
Prior, J. B. The lay person's understanding of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 1985, 13, 273–286.
Rhodin, N. K. Comment: Employment discrimination—Sexual harassment and Title VII—Female employees' claim alleging verbal and physical advances by a male supervisor dismissed as nonactionable. Corne v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc. New York University Law Review, 1976, 148–165.
Safran, C. What men do to women on the job: A shocking look at sexual harassment. Redbook, November 1976, 217–224.
Sangamon State University, Center for Policy Studies and Program Evaluation. Study of unwanted sexual attention received by female state employees: Preliminary data. Springfield, IL: Sangamon State University, 1979.
Seymour, W. C. Sexual harassment: finding a cause of action under Title VII. Labor Law Journal, 1979, 139–156.
Skeen, R., & Nielsen, J. Sociological analysis of student faculty sexual relationships. Unpublished paper, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, 1982.
Snedacor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. Statistical methods (6th ed.), Ames, Iowa: Iowa University Press, 1967.
Sokoloff, N. J. Between money and love: The dialectics of women's home and market work. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1980.
Till, F. J. Sexual harassment: A report on the sexual harassment of students. Report of the National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Programs. U.S. Department of Education, 1980.
United Nations Ad Hoc Group on Equal Rights for Women. Report on Questionnaire XXXVI. Report on file at New York University Law Review, reported in Note 51, New York University Law Review, 1976, 148–149.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, Office of Merit Systems Review and Studies. Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Is it a problem? Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1981.
Weitzman, L. J. Sex role socialization. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1979.
Working Women's Institute. Sexual Harassment on the job: Results of preliminary survey. New York: Working Women's Institute, 1975.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dair Gillespie at the University of Utah was instrumental in obtaining the data for this study and commenting on the original analysis. Theda Skocpol at the University of Chicago provided support at the Center for the Study of Industrial Societies during the completion of this research. Comments of Joe Conaty, William Wilson, John Comaroff, and many others were supportive and helpful. Finally, we wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fain, T.C., Anderton, D.L. Sexual harassment: Organizational context and diffuse status. Sex Roles 17, 291–311 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288454
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288454