Skip to main content
Log in

Height differences of low and high job status, female and male corporate employees

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The heights of female and male corporate employees in management and nonmanagement positions were evaluated in two studies in order to determine if there were height differences between the two groups, and if there were any gender × job status (management or nonmanagement) interactions with respect to height. Two studies were conducted having 201 and 200 subjects respectively. Both studies used a two-factor (gender × job status) factorial design and both studies showed that managerial (high status) employees were significantly (p≤.006) taller than those occupying nonmanagement positions, regardless of gender. Possible reasons for the overall phenomenon of taller individuals occupying higher status positions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bleda, P. R., & Bleda, S. E. (1977). Attitude similarity, attraction, perception of height, and judgment of agreement. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 8, 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannenmaier, W. D., & Thumin, F. J. (1964). Authority status as a factor in perceptual distortion of size. Journal of Social Psychology, 63, 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deck, L. P. (1968). Buying brains by the inch. The Journal of College and University Personnel Association, 19, 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1982). Do taller men have prettier girlfriends? Psychological Reports, 50, 810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I. H., Olson, J. E., & Good, D. C. (1990). Perceived and actual discrimination in the salaries of male and female managers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 46–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, W., Brothen, T., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Height and attraction: Do men and women see eye-to-eye? Journal of Personality, 46, 128–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, W. E. (1983). Gender, self-esteem and height. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, W. E., & Cooper, R. (1987). Height and occupational success: A review and critique. Psychological Reports, 60, 843–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L. G., Davey, T. C., & Park, R. K. (1985). Longitudinal correlation analysis of standing height and intelligence. Child Development, 56, 1465–1478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, R. (1980). The height of your life. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechelt, E. C. (1975). Occupational affiliation and ratings of physical height and personal esteem. Psychological Reports, 36, 943–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M., & Moore, T. (1974). Sex and status effects on perception of physical attractiveness. Psychological Reports, 34, 1047–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, J. (1984). Deviational salience: Application to short stature and relation to perception of adolescent boys. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 623–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagoshi, C. T., & Johnson, R. C. (1987). Between-vs. within-family analyses of the correlation of height and intelligence. Social Biology, 34, 110–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto, A. G., & Robbins, M. C. (1975). Perceptions of height and self-esteem. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 395–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, J. M. (1966). Galtonian eugenics and the study of growth: The relation of body size, intelligence test score, and social circumstances in children and adults. The Eugenics Review, 58, 122–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. M., Hammer, L. D., Duncan, P., Dornbusch, S., Ritter, P., Hintz, R., Gross, R., & Rosendfeld, R. (1986). Growth and intellectual development. Pediatrics, 78, 646–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. R. (1968). Perceptual distortion of height as a function of ascribed academic status. The Journal of Social Psychology, 74, 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors wish to thank Susan L. Bertone, Sharon McClelland, and Earl Munch for their assistance with this research project. Part of the information contained in this article was presented at the 1989 annual convention of the Eastern Communication Association in Ocean City, Maryland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Egolf, D.B., Corder, L.E. Height differences of low and high job status, female and male corporate employees. Sex Roles 24, 365–373 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288309

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288309

Keywords

Navigation