The effects of the sex composition of groups on style of social interaction
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Bales's revised interaction category analyses (1970) were done from audio tapes of 77 four-person discussion groups: 46 mixed-sex groups, 15 female groups, and 16 male groups. Each group discussed three cases for a total of 35 minutes. The hypothesis tested was that females in mixed-sex groups would suppress their level of “task” contribution and engage in higher levels of “socioemotional” contributions when compared to the performance of women in one-sex groups. Males were also predicted to become more sex-role stereotyped in mixed-sex groups, showing the opposite effect. Results showed large sex differences, regardless of group composition, in the direction of traditional sex roles. The effect of group composition, however, was opposite to that predicted. An effect of an experimental intervention during the second discussion topic on subsequent sex-role performance was also found. Implications for education are discussed.
- Bales, R. F. Interaction process analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1950.
- Bales, R. F. Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970.
- Bavelas, A., Hastorf, A. H., Gross, A. E., & Kite, W. K. Experiments on the alteration of group structure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 55–70.
- Bennett, E. M., & Cohen, L. R. Men and women: Personality patterns and contrasts. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1959, 59, 101–155.
- Bernard, J. Women and public interest: An essay in policy and protest. New York: Aldine, 1971.
- Block, J. H. Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 512–526.
- Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. The Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28(2), 59–78.
- D'Andrade, R. G. Sex differences and cultural institutions. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1966.
- Goffman, E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1959.
- Hartley, R. Sex role pressures in the socialization of the male child. Psychological Reports, 1959, 5(3), 457–468.
- Horner, M. Fail, bright woman. Psychology Today, 1969, 3(6), 36–38.
- Jackson, P., & Lahaderne, H. Inequalities of teacher—pupil contacts. In M. Silverman (Ed.), The experience of schooling. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.
- Kagan, J. Sex typing and sex role identity. In M. L. Hoffman & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1964.
- Komarovsky, M. Cultural contradictions and sex roles: The masculine case. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78, 873–884.
- Leik, R. K. Instrumentality and emotionality in family interaction. Sociometry, 1963, 26, 131–145.
- Levitan, T. E., & Chananie, J. C. Responses of female primary school teachers to sex-typed behaviors in male and female children. Child Development, 1972, 43, 1309–1316.
- Lockheed, M. E., & Hall, K. P. Conceptualizing sex as a status characteristic: applications to leadership training strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 111–124.
- Maracek, J., Piliavin, J. A., Fitzsimmons, E., Krogh, E. C., Leader, E., & Trudell, B. Women as TV experts: The voice of authority? Journal of Communication, 1978, 28(1), 159–168.
- McKee, J. P., & Sherriffs, W. C. Men's and women's beliefs, ideals, and self-concepts. In J. M. Seidman (Ed.), The adolescent: A book of readings. New York: Dryden Press, 1960.
- O'Rourke, J. F. Field and laboratory: The decision-making behavior of family groups in two experimental conditions. Sociometry, 1963, 26, 422–435.
- Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. Family, socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1955.
- Piliavin, J. A. On feminine self-presentation in groups. In J. Roberts (Ed.), Beyond intellectual sexism: A new woman, a new reality. New York: David McKay Company, 1976.
- Sears, P. S., & Feldman, D. H. Teacher interactions with boys and with girls. The National Elementary Principal, 1966, 46(2), 30–35.
- Steinman, A. A study of the concept of the female role. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1963, 67(2), 275–352.
- Strauss, M. A. The influence of sex of child and social class on instrumental and expressive family roles in a laboratory setting. Sociology and Social Research, 1967, 52(1), 7–21.
- Strodtbeck, F. L., & Mann, R. D. Sex role differentiation in jury deliberation. Sociometry, 1956, 19(1), 3–11.
- Winer, B. J. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
- Zelditch, M., Jr. Role differentiation in the nuclear family: A comparative study. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family socialization and interaction process. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1955.
- The effects of the sex composition of groups on style of social interaction
Volume 4, Issue 2 , pp 281-296
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors