Abstract
Two experiments were performed to replicate and extend previous findings of judgmental bias which favors physically attractive people. In the first experiment male and female subjects judged an essay purportedly written by an attractive or an unattractive female author. The attractive author was rated as significantly more talented by male judges. Female judges rated the attractive author as less talented, although this difference was not statistically significant. A second experiment concerned ratings by males and females of essays written by attractive or unattractive male authors. The results suggested that the attractiveness halo effect does not occur for male authors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. Beauty and the best. Psychology Today, 1972, 5, 42–46.
Burne, D., London, O., & Reeves, K. The effects of physical attractiveness, sex, and attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality, 1968, 36, 259–271.
Clifford, M. M., & Walster, E. The effects of physical attractiveness on teacher expectation. Sociology of Education, 1973, 46, 248–258.
Dermer, M., & Thiel, D. L. When beauty may fail. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 1168–1176.
Dion, K. Physical attractiveness and the evaluation of children's transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 207–213.
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 285–290.
Dipbaze, R. L., Fromkin, H. L., & Wilback, K. Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness and scholastic standing in the evaluation of applicant resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 39–43.
Kaplan, R. M., & Goldman, R. D. Interracial perception among Black, White, and Mexican-American high school students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 28, 383–389.
Kaplan, R. M., & Litrownik, A. J. Some statistical procedures for the assessment of multiple outcome criteria in behavioral research. Behavior Therapy, 1977, 8, 383–392.
Krebs, D., & Adinolfi, A. A. Physical attractiveness, social relations, and personality style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 245–253.
Landy, D., & Sigall, H. Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 299–304.
Rao, R. Advanced statistical methods in biometric research. New York: Wiley, 1952.
Sigall, H., & Ostrove, N. Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 410–414.
Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. The importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 508–516.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaplan, R.M. Is beauty talent? Sex interaction in the attractiveness halo effect. Sex Roles 4, 195–204 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287500
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287500