Abstract
On the basis of recent findings showing that physical attractiveness serves as an important evaluative cue in person perception, the present paper reviews evidence which indicates that physical attractiveness differentially affects the judgments of males and females. Recent research seems to indicate that the physical-attractiveness stereotype — which holds that attractive individuals are more positively evaluated across a wide range of dimensions than unattractive individuals — is more potent when applied to women than to men. The origins of this differential stereotyping are discussed in terms of the historically defined roles of men and women in our society. In addition, the paper discusses the implications of the physical-attractiveness stereotype for the general problem of sex-role stereotyping.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldous, J. Occupational characteristics and males role performance in the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1969, 31, 707–712.
Anastasi, A. Psychological differences between men and women. In W. C. Bier (Ed.), Women in modern life. New York: Fordham University Press, 1968.
Bar-Tal, D., & Saxe, L. Perceptions of similarly and dissimilarly attractive couples and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, in press.
Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, G. W. Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971, 7, 173–189.
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1974.
Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. Husbands and wives. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1960.
Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P.S. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 59–78.
Byrne, D., London, O., & Reeves, K. The effects of physical attractiveness, sex, and attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality, 1968, 36, 259–271.
Christensen, H. T. Marriage analysis: Foundations for successful family life. New York: The Ronald Press, 1958.
Clifford, M. M., & Walster, E. The effect of physical attractiveness on teacher expectations. Sociology of Education, 1973, 46, 248–258.
Coombs, R. H., & Kenkel, W. F. Sex differences in dating aspirations and satisfaction with computer-selected partners. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1966, 28, 62–66.
Cross, J. F., & Cross, J. Age, sex, race, and the perception of facial beauty. Developmental Psychology, 1971, 5, 433–439.
Dion, K. K. Young children's stereotyping of facial attractiveness. Developmental Psychology, 1973, 9, 183–188.
Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 285–290.
Elder, G. Appearance and education in marriage mobility. American Sociological Review, 1969, 34, 519–533.
Frieze, I. Changing self-images and sex-role stereotypes in college women. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, 1974.
Gergen, K. J. Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 26, 309–320.
Good, W. J. Family and mobility. In R. Bendix & S. M. Lipset (Eds.), Class, status, and power. New York: The Free Press, 1966.
Harris, D. Sex differences in the life problems and interests of adolescents, 1935 and 1957. Child Development, 1959, 30, 453–459.
Hewitt, L. E. Student perceptions of traits desired in themselves as dating and marriage partners. Marriage and Family Living, 1958, 20, 344–349.
Hill, R. Campus values on mate selection. Journal of Home Economics, 1945, 37, 554–558.
Hudson, J. W., & Henze, L. F. Campus values in mate selection: A replication. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1969, 31, 772–775.
Komarovsky, M. Cultural contradiction and sex roles: The masculine case. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78, 873–884.
Krebs, D., & Adinolfi, A. A. Physical attractiveness, Social relations, and personality style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 245–253.
Landy, D., & Sigall, H. Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 299–304.
Lerner, R. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Stuart, J. L. Relations among physical attractiveness, body attitudes, and self-concept in male and female college students. Journal of Psychology, 1973, 85, 119–121.
McGinnis, R. Campus values in male selection: A repeat study. Social Forces, 1958, 36, 368–373.
McKee, J. P., & Sherriffs, A. C. Men's and women's beliefs, ideals, and self concept. American Journal of Sociology, 1959, 64, 356–363.
Mednick, M. S., & Tangri, S. S. (Eds.). New perspectives on women. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 1–246.
Miller, A. G. Role of physical attractiveness in impression formation. Psychonomic Science, 1970, 19, 241–243.
Miller, H. L., & Rivenbark, W. H. Sexual differences in physical attractiveness as a determinant of heterosexual liking. Psychological Reports, 1970, 27, 701–702.
O'Leary, V. E. Some attitudinal barriers to occupational aspirations in women. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 809–826.
Prather, J. Why can't women be more like men. American Behavioral Scientist, 1971, 15, 172–181.
Rossi, A. S. The roots of ambivalence in American women. In J. M. Bardwick (Ed.), Readings on the psychology of women. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.
Saxe, L., Bar-Tal, D., & Wiener, S. Physical attractiveness as a determinant of attributions of causality for success and failure. Unpublished manuscript, Boston University, 1975.
Seward, G. H. Sex and the social order. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1946.
Stroebe, W., Insko, C. A., Thompson, V. D., & Layton, B. D. Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity, and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 18, 79–91.
Vail, J. P., & Staudt, V. M. Attitudes of college students toward marriage and related problems: I. Dating and mate selection. Journal of Psychology, 1950, 30, 171–182.
Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottmann, L. Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 508–516.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors would like to thank Irene Frieze, Gerald Porter, Susan Solomon, Benny Shanon and Ellen Berscheid for their comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bar-Tal, D., Saxe, L. Physical attractiveness and its relationship to sex-role stereotyping. Sex Roles 2, 123–133 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287245
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287245