Skip to main content
Log in

Unknown probabilities

In memory of Annemarie Anrod Shimony (1928–1995)

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From a point of view like de Finetti's, what is the judgmental reality underlying the objectivistic claim that a physical magnitude X determines the objective probability that a hypothesis H is true? When you have definite conditional judgmental probabilities for H given the various unknown values of X, a plausible answer is sufficiency, i.e., invariance of those conditional probabilities as your probability distribution over the values of X varies. A different answer, in terms of conditional exchangeability, is offered for use when such definite conditional probabilities are absent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Born, Max: 1983, ‘On the Quantum Mechanics of Collisions’, in J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (eds.), Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton, 1983, pp. 52–55.

  • de Finetti, Bruno: 1937, ‘La Prévision: ses Lois Logiques, ses Sources Subjectives’, translated in Henry Kyburg, Jr. and Howard Smokler (eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability, Krieger 1980.

  • DiaconisPersi: 1977, ‘Finite Forms of de Finetti's Theorem on Exchangeability’, Synthese 36, 271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiaconisPersi and FreedmanDavid: 1980, ‘Finite Exchangeable Sequences’, Annals of Probability 8, 745–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaifman, Haim: 1988, ‘A Theory of Higher Order Probability’, in B. Skyrms et al. (eds.), Causality, Chance, and Choice, Reidel 1988.

  • GoodI. J.: 1986, ‘Some Statistical Applications of Poisson's Work’, Statistical Science 1, 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David: 1888, in Selby-Bigge (ed.), A Treatise of Human Nature (1739), Oxford.

  • Jeffrey, Richard: 1992, Probability and the Art of Judgment, Cambridge.

  • JeffreyRichard: 1993, ‘de Finetti's Radical Probabilism’, Probabilità e induzione, PaolaMonari and DanielaCocchi (eds.), Biblioteca di Statistica, CLUEB, Bologna, pp. 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov, A. N.: 1956, Foundations of the Theory of Probability, Chelsea.

  • LeedsStephen: 1984, ‘Chance, Realism, Quantum Mechanics’, The Journal of Philosophy 8, 567–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: 1986, ‘A Subjectivist's Guide to Objective Chance’, in Philosophical Papers II, Oxford.

  • MillerDavid: 1966, ‘A Paradox of Information’, British J. Philosophy of Science 17, 59–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, Frederick: 1965, Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability with Solutions, Dover.

  • PopperKarl: 1957, ‘The Propensity Interpretation of the Calculus of Probability, and the Quantum Theory’, in S.Köner (ed.), Observation and Interpretation, Butterworths (London), pp. 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimony, Abner: 1993, Search for a Naturalistic World View, vol. 1, Cambridge.

  • Skyrms, Brian: 1984, Pragmatics and Empiricism, Yale.

  • van Fraassen, Bas: 1989, Laws and Symmetry, Oxford.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeffrey, R. Unknown probabilities. Erkenntnis 45, 327–335 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276797

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276797

Keywords

Navigation