Skip to main content
Log in

The staging of soft-tissue sarcomas

  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We have assessed the ability of the American Joint Committee System, the Hajdu and the Surgical Staging System to separate different prognostic groups of patients with soft-tissue sarcoma. There were 122 patients with nonmetastatic tumours of the locomotor system. All were operated on with a wide, or radical, surgical margin. None of the staging systems could identify more than two groups with significantly different overall survival. A plea is made for the use of statistical multivariate analysis of prognostic factors when constructing staging systems for soft-tissue sarcoma.

Résumé

Les auteurs ont cherché à déterminer la valeur pronostique des trois systèmes de classification des sarcomes des tissus mous, à savoir le système de l'American Joint Committee, celui de Hajdu et celui du Surgical Staging. Cent vingt-deux patients porteurs de tels sarcomes, mais sans métatastases, ont été analysés. Tous ont été traités par exérèse large, passant en tissus sains. Aucun système n'a permis d'identifier plus de deux groupes de malades ayant des taux de survie différents. On recommande de pratiquer une analyse statistique multivariée des facteurs pronostiques avant de construire un système de classification des sarcomes des tissus mous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbas JS, Holyoke ED, Moore R, Karakousis C (1981) The surgical treatment and outcome of soft-tissue sarcoma. Arch Surg 116: 765–769

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angervall L (1981) Grading and other prognostic factors of sarcomas and lipomatous tumors. In: Veronesi U (ed) I tumori delle ossa e dei tessuti molli. (XXI Corso d'aggiornamento in oncologia clinica, Giugno 1980), Milano; 35–39

  3. Costa J, Wesley RA, Glatstein E, Rosenberg SA (1984) The grading of soft tissue sarcomas. Results of a clinicohistopathologic correlation in a series of 163 cases. Cancer 53: 530–541

    Google Scholar 

  4. DeStefani E, Deneo-Pellegrini H, Carzoglio J, Cendan ME, Vass A, Coppola J, Olivera L, Viola A (1982) Sarcomes des tissue mous: facteurs histologiques de pronostic. Bull Cancer 69: 53: 443–450

    Google Scholar 

  5. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MD (1980) A System for the Surgical Staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop 153: 106–120

    Google Scholar 

  6. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Malawer M (1981) The effect of anatomical setting on the results of surgical procedures for soft parts sarcoma of the thigh. Cancer 47: 1050–1022

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hajdu SI (1979) Pathology of soft tissue tumors. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia pp 44–47

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heise HW, Myers MH, Russel WO, Suit HD, Enzinger FM, Edmonson JH, Cohen J, Martin RG, Miller WT, Hajdu SI (1986) Recurrence-free survival time for surgically treated soft tissue sarcoma patients. Multivariate analysis of five prognostic factors. Cancer 57: 172–177

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kindblom LG, Angervall L, Svendsen P (1975) Liposarcoma. A clinicopathologic, radiographic and prognostic study. Acta Path Microbiol Scand Sect A [Suppl] 253: 1–71

    Google Scholar 

  10. Markhede G, Angervall L, Stener B (1982) A multivariate analysis of the prognosis after surgical treatment of malignant soft tissue tumors. Cancer 49: 1721–1733

    Google Scholar 

  11. Merck C, Angervall L, Kindblom LG, Odén A (1983) Myxofibrosarcoma. A malignant soft tissue tumor of fibroblastic-histiocytic origin. A clinico pathologic and prognostic study of 110 cases using multivariate analysis. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Sect A [Suppl] 282: 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  12. Russel WO, Cohen J, Enzinger F, Hajdu SI, Heise H, Martin RG, Meissner, Miller WT, Schmitz RL, Suite HD (1977). A clinical and pathological staging system for soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer 40: 1562–1570

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rydholm A (1983) Management of patients with soft tissue tumors. Strategy developed at a regional oncology center. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 203: 54: 1–77

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sears HF, Hopson R, Inoye W, Rizzo T, Grotzinger PI (1980) Analysis of staging and management of patients with sarcoma. A ten-year experience. Ann Surg 191: 481–493

    Google Scholar 

  15. Trojani M, Contesso G, Coindre JM, Rouesse J, Bui NB, de Mascarel A, Goussot JF, David M, Bonichon F, Lagarde C (1984) Soft tissue sarcomas of adults; Study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathologic grading system. Int J Cancer 33: 37–42

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wright PH, Sim FH, Soule EH, Taylor WF (1982) Synovial sarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64: 112–122

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rööser, B., Attewell, R. & Rydholm, A. The staging of soft-tissue sarcomas. International Orthopaedics 11, 339–343 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00271311

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00271311

Key words

Navigation