Skip to main content
Log in

On some U,S-tense logics

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. J. P. Burgess, ‘Axioms for Tense Logic I. “Since” and “Until”’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (1982), pp. 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. P. Burgess, ‘Basic Tense Logic’, in D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. II, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984, pp. 89–133.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. K. Thomason, ‘Semantic Analysis of Tense Logics’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (1972), pp. 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. K. Thomason, ‘An Incompleteness Theorem in Modal Logic’, Theoria 40 (1974), pp. 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. A. K. van Benthem, ‘Two Simple Incomplete Modal Logics’, Theoria 44 (1978), pp. 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. F. A. K. van Benthem, ‘Syntactic Aspects of Modal Incompleteness Theorems’, Theoria 45 (1979), pp. 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. F. A. K. van Benthem, ‘Tense Logic, Second-Order Logic and Natural Language’, in U. Mönnich (ed.), Aspects of Philosophical Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. F. A. K. van Benthem, ‘Correspondence Theory’, in D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. II, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984, pp. 167–247.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, M. On some U,S-tense logics. J Philos Logic 17, 181–202 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247911

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247911

Navigation