Skip to main content
Log in

Transfer of resistance to the beet cyst nematode (Heterodera Schachtii Schm.) from Sinapis alba L. (white mustard) to the Brassica napus L. gene pool by means of sexual and somatic hybridization

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Sexual and somatic hybrid plants have been produced between Sinapis alba L. (white mustard) and Brassica napus L. (oil-seed rape), with the aim to transfer resistance to the beet cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii Schm. (BCN) from white mustard into the oil-seed rape gene pool. Only crosses between diploid accessions of S. alba (2n = 24, Sa1Sa1) as the pistillate parent and several B. napus accessions (2n = 38, AACC) yielded hybrid plants with 31 chromosomes. Crosses between tetraploid accessions of S. alba (2n = 48, Sa1Sa1Sa1Sa1) and B. napus were unsuccessful. Somatic hybrid plants were also obtained between a diploid accession of S. alba and B. napus. These hybrids were mitotically unstable, the number of chromosomes ranging from 56 to more than 90. Analysis of total DNA using a pea rDNA probe confirmed the hybrid nature of the sexual hybrids, whereas for the somatic hybrids a pattern identical to that of B. napus was obtained. Using chloroplast (cp) and mitochondrial (mt) DNA sequences, we found that all of the sexual F1 hybrids and somatic hybrids contained cpDNA and mtDNA of the S. alba parent. No recombinant mtDNA or cpDNA pattern was observed. Three BC1 plants were obtained when sexual hybrids were back-crossed with B. napus. Backcrossing of somatic hybrids with B. napus was not successful. Three sexual hybrids and one BC1 plant, the latter obtained from a cross between a sexual hybrid and B. napus, were found to show a high level of BCN resistance. The level of BCN resistance of the somatic hybrids was in general high, but varied between cuttings from the same plant. Results from cytological studies of chromosome association at meiotic metaphase I in the sexual hybrids suggest partial homology between chromosomes of the AC and Sa1 genomes and thus their potential for gene exchange.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdalla MMF, Hermsen JGTh (1972) Unilateral incompatibility: hypotheses, debate and its implications for plant breeding. Euphytica 21:32–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnihotri A, Gupta V, Lakshmikumaran MS, Shivanna KR, Prakash S, Jagannathan V (1990) Production of Eruca-Brassica hybrids by embryo rescue. Plant Breed 104:281–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra V, Prakash S, Shivanna KR (1990) Intergeneric hybridization between Diplotaxis siifolia, a wild species and crop brassicas. Theor Appl Genet 80:537–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Binding H, Nehls R, Jörgensen J (1982) Protoplast regeneration in higher plants. In: Fujiwara A (ed) Plant tissue culture 1982. Japanese association for plant tissue culture, Tokyo, pp 575–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang MS, Chiang BY, Grant WF (1977) Transfer of resistance to race 2 of Plasmodiophora brassicae from Brassica napus to cabbage (B). oleracea var capitata. I. Interspecific hybridization between B. napus and B. Oleracea var ‘capitata’. Euphytica 26:319–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delourme R, Eber F, Chèvre AM (1989) Intergeneric hybridization of Diplotaxis erucoides with Brassica napus. I. Cytogenetic analysis of F1 and BC1 progeny. Euphytica 41:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Eenink AH (1974) Matromorphy in Brassica oleracea L. I. Terminology, parthenogenesis in Cruciferae and the formation and usability of matromorphic plants. Euphytica 23:429–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Glimelius K (1984) High growth rate and regeneration capacity of hypocotyl protoplasts in some Brassicaceae. Physiol Plant 61:38–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Glimelius K, Fahleson J, Landgren M, Sjödin C, Sundberg E (1989) Somatic hybridization as a means to broaden the gene pool of cruciferous oil plants. Sver Utsädesfören Tidskr 99:103–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas JM de, Boot KJM, Haring MA, Kool AJ, Nijkamp HJJ (1986) A Petunia hybrida chloroplast DNA region, close to one of the inverted repeats, shows sequence homology with the Euglena gracilis chloroplast DNA region that carries the putative replication origin. Mol Gen Genet 202:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Heij HT de, Lustig H, Ee JH van, Vos YJ, Groot GSP (1985) Repeated sequences on mitochondrial DNA of Spirodela Oligorhiza. Plant Mol Biol 4:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MM, Inden H, Asahira T (1990) Seed vernalized interspecific hybrids through in vitro ovule culture in Brassica. Plant Sci 68:95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreike CM, Koning JRA de, Krens FA (1990) Non-radioactive detection of single-copy DNA-DNA hybrids. Plant Mol Biol Rep 8:172–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelivelt CLC, Krens FA (1992) Transfer of resistance to the beet cyst nematode (Heterodera schachtii Schm.) into the Brassica napus L. gene pool through intergeneric somatic hybridization with Raphanus sativus L. Theor Appl Genet 83:887–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias R (1991) Improved embryo rescue technique for intergeneric hybridization between Sinapis species and Brassica napus. Crucif Newsl 14/15:90–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Menczel L, Wolfe K (1984) High frequency of fusion induced in freely suspended protoplast mixtures by polyethylene glycol and dimethylsulfoxide at high pH. Plant Cell Rep 3:196–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizushima U (1980) Genome analysis in Brassica and allied genera. In: Tsunoda S, Hinata K, Gomez-Campo C (eds) Brassica crops and wild allies. Biology and breeding. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, pp 89–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–479

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishi S, Kuriyama T, Hiraoka T (1964) Studies on the breeding of Crucifer vegetables by interspecific and intergeneric hybridization. Bull Hortic Res Stn Jpn A3:161–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier G, Primard C, Vedel F, Chetrit P, Remy R, Rouselle P, Renard M (1983) Intergeneric cytoplasmic hybridization in Cruciferae by protoplast fusion. Mol Gen Genet 191:244–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Primard C, Vedel F, Mathieu C, Pelletier G, Chèvre AM (1988) Interspecific somatic hybridization between Brassica napus and Brassica hirta (Sinapis alba L.). Theor Appl Genet 75:546–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley VL, Arinson PG (1990) Hybridization of Sinapis alba L. and Brassica napus L. via embryo rescue. Plant Breed 104:26–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouxel T, Renard M, Kollmann A, Bousquet J-F (1990) Brassilexin accumulation and resistance to Leptoshaeria Maculans in Brassica spp. and progeny of an interspecific cross B. Juncea x B. napus. Euphytica 46:175–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikdar SR, Chatterjee G, Das G, Sen SK (1990) ‘Erussica’, the intergeneric fertile somatic hybrid developed through protoplast fusion between Eruca sativa Lam. and Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. Theor Appl Genet 79:561–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg E (1991) Somatic hybrids and cybrids within Brassicaceae. PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai W, Ikonen H (1988) Incomplete bivalent pairing in dihaploids of Brassica napus L. Genome 30:450–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Toriyama K, Hinata K, Kameya T (1987) Production of somatic hybrid plants, ‘Brassicomoricandia’, through protoplast fusion between Moricandia arvensis and Brassica oleracea. Plant Sci 48:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Toxopeus H, Lubberts JH (1979) Breeding for resistance to the sugar beet nematode (Heterodera Schachtii Schm) in cruciferous crops. In: Marreuijk NPA van, Toxopeus H (eds). Proc Eucarpia Cruciferae Conf. (Post-conference edition). Wageningen, p 151

  • Turesson G, Nordenskiöld H (1943) Chromosome doubling and cross combination in some cruciferous plants. Ann Agric College Sweden 11:201–206

    Google Scholar 

  • U N, Nagamatsu T, Mizushima U (1937) A report on meiosis in two hybrids, Brassica alba Rabh. x B. Oleracea L. and Eruca sativa Lam. x B. Oleracea L. Cytologia, Fujii Jubilee Vol 437–441

  • Zenkteler M (1990) In-vitro fertilization of ovules of some species of Brassicaceae. Plant Breed 105:221–228.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. Wenzel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lelivelt, C.L.C., Leunissen, E.H.M., Frederiks, H.J. et al. Transfer of resistance to the beet cyst nematode (Heterodera Schachtii Schm.) from Sinapis alba L. (white mustard) to the Brassica napus L. gene pool by means of sexual and somatic hybridization. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 85, 688–696 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225006

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225006

Key words

Navigation