Abstract
Slash-and-burn agricultural systems have received a great deal of attention given their observed or hypothesized role in tropical deforestion, biodiversity loss, and contribution to global warming. These agricultural systems are varied; and such diversity has led to confusion in making cross-site comparisons. One hundred and three publications describing 136 cases were reviewed in order to develop a scheme to classify slash-and-burn systems. Four variables — initial vegetative cover, type of user, final cover, and fallow length — were used to describe each case. Nine groups representing the same or similar combinations of values were identified. Groups were keyed for placement of each case on a global map indicating geographic distribution. The method provides a way to establish similarities or differences among slash-and-burn cases (or representativeness of cases) to the degree that available literature represents what exists in the field. Researchers are invited to provide descriptors of additional cases, respective references, and case locations in order to improve and test the utility of the method and to simultaneously expand the resulting database.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASB (1994) Alternatives to slash-and-burn: a global initiative. Summary report of a research methodological workshop held 25 February – 8 March 1993 in Bogor, West Java, and Sitiung, West Sumatra, Indonesia: International centre for Research on Agroforestry (ICRAF) and the project Alternatives to Slash-and-Burn (ASB)
Boerboom JHA and Wiersum KF (1983) Human impact on tropical moist forest. In: Holzner W, Werger MJA and Ikusima I (eds) Man's Impact on Vegetation. Dr W Junk Publications, The Hague
Conklin HC (1963) The Study of Shifting Cultivation. Studies and Monographs VI. Union Panamerica, Washington, DC
Conklin HC (1954) An ethnoecological approach to shifting agriculture. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences 2(17): 133–142
Fujisaka S, Bell W, Thomas N, Hurtado L and Crawford E. Slash-and-burn agriculture, conversion to pasture, and deforestation in two Brazilian Amazon colonies. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment (in press)
Grandstaff T (1978) The development of swidden agriculture (shifting cultivation). Development and Change 9(4)
Greenland D (1974) Evolution and development of different types of shifting cultivation. FAO Soils Bulletin 24: 5–13
Hecht S, Thrupp LA and Browder J (1995) The diversity and dynamics of shifting cultivation: myths, realities, and human dimensions. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC
Kartawinata K, Soedjito H, Jessup T, Vayda AP and Colfer CJP (1984) The impact of development on interactions between people and forests in East Kalimantan: a comparison of two areas of Kenyah Dayak settlement. In: Hanks S (ed) Traditional Life Styles, Conservation, and Rural Development. IUCN (EAPI Reprint 76)
Kundstadter P and Chapman EC (1978) Problems of shifting cultivation and economic development in northern Thailand. In: Kundstadter P, Chapmand EC and Sabhasri S (eds) Farmers in the Forest: Economic Development and Marginal Agriculture in Northern Thailand. University Press of Hawaii/East-West Center, Honolulu
Majid Z (1983) Malaysia. In: Atal Y and Bennagen P (eds) Swidden Agriculture in Asia 2. UNESCO Regional Office for Education in Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok
Margolis M (1977) Historical perspectives on frontier agriculture as an adaptive strategy. American Ethnologist 4(1): 42–64
Miracle MP (1967) Agriculture in the Congo Basin: Tradition and Change in African Rural Economies. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
Norgaard RB (1981) Sociosystem and ecosystem co-evolution in the Amazon. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8: 238–254
Ruthenburg H (1980) Farming Systems in the Tropics, 3rd ed. Clarendon, Oxford
Spencer JE (1966) Shifting Cultivation in Southeast Asia. University of California Press, Berkeley
Stocks A (1983) Candoshi and Cocamilla swiddens in eastern Peru. Human Ecology 11(1): 69–84
Watters RF (1971) Shifting cultivation in Latin America. FAO Forestry Development Paper 17
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fujisaka, S., Hurtado, L. & Uribe, R. A working classification of slash-and-burn agricultural systems. Agroforest Syst 34, 151–169 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148159
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148159