Skip to main content
Log in

A working classification of slash-and-burn agricultural systems

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Slash-and-burn agricultural systems have received a great deal of attention given their observed or hypothesized role in tropical deforestion, biodiversity loss, and contribution to global warming. These agricultural systems are varied; and such diversity has led to confusion in making cross-site comparisons. One hundred and three publications describing 136 cases were reviewed in order to develop a scheme to classify slash-and-burn systems. Four variables — initial vegetative cover, type of user, final cover, and fallow length — were used to describe each case. Nine groups representing the same or similar combinations of values were identified. Groups were keyed for placement of each case on a global map indicating geographic distribution. The method provides a way to establish similarities or differences among slash-and-burn cases (or representativeness of cases) to the degree that available literature represents what exists in the field. Researchers are invited to provide descriptors of additional cases, respective references, and case locations in order to improve and test the utility of the method and to simultaneously expand the resulting database.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASB (1994) Alternatives to slash-and-burn: a global initiative. Summary report of a research methodological workshop held 25 February – 8 March 1993 in Bogor, West Java, and Sitiung, West Sumatra, Indonesia: International centre for Research on Agroforestry (ICRAF) and the project Alternatives to Slash-and-Burn (ASB)

  • Boerboom JHA and Wiersum KF (1983) Human impact on tropical moist forest. In: Holzner W, Werger MJA and Ikusima I (eds) Man's Impact on Vegetation. Dr W Junk Publications, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin HC (1963) The Study of Shifting Cultivation. Studies and Monographs VI. Union Panamerica, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin HC (1954) An ethnoecological approach to shifting agriculture. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences 2(17): 133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaka S, Bell W, Thomas N, Hurtado L and Crawford E. Slash-and-burn agriculture, conversion to pasture, and deforestation in two Brazilian Amazon colonies. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment (in press)

  • Grandstaff T (1978) The development of swidden agriculture (shifting cultivation). Development and Change 9(4)

  • Greenland D (1974) Evolution and development of different types of shifting cultivation. FAO Soils Bulletin 24: 5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht S, Thrupp LA and Browder J (1995) The diversity and dynamics of shifting cultivation: myths, realities, and human dimensions. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartawinata K, Soedjito H, Jessup T, Vayda AP and Colfer CJP (1984) The impact of development on interactions between people and forests in East Kalimantan: a comparison of two areas of Kenyah Dayak settlement. In: Hanks S (ed) Traditional Life Styles, Conservation, and Rural Development. IUCN (EAPI Reprint 76)

  • Kundstadter P and Chapman EC (1978) Problems of shifting cultivation and economic development in northern Thailand. In: Kundstadter P, Chapmand EC and Sabhasri S (eds) Farmers in the Forest: Economic Development and Marginal Agriculture in Northern Thailand. University Press of Hawaii/East-West Center, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Majid Z (1983) Malaysia. In: Atal Y and Bennagen P (eds) Swidden Agriculture in Asia 2. UNESCO Regional Office for Education in Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis M (1977) Historical perspectives on frontier agriculture as an adaptive strategy. American Ethnologist 4(1): 42–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miracle MP (1967) Agriculture in the Congo Basin: Tradition and Change in African Rural Economies. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard RB (1981) Sociosystem and ecosystem co-evolution in the Amazon. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8: 238–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthenburg H (1980) Farming Systems in the Tropics, 3rd ed. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer JE (1966) Shifting Cultivation in Southeast Asia. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocks A (1983) Candoshi and Cocamilla swiddens in eastern Peru. Human Ecology 11(1): 69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watters RF (1971) Shifting cultivation in Latin America. FAO Forestry Development Paper 17

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fujisaka, S., Hurtado, L. & Uribe, R. A working classification of slash-and-burn agricultural systems. Agroforest Syst 34, 151–169 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148159

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148159

Key words

Navigation