Abstract
Anti-capitalist thinkers in the West have long argued that the expansion of markets creates new wants faster than it can satisfy them, and that consumption under capitalism is a form of addictive behavior. Recently, however, the relentless expansion of desire has come to be seen as a strength rather than a weakness of capitalist regimes. To understand this change socialists must consider whether there is a point to consumer spending that goes beyond satisfaction with what one gets. Freud's notion of instinctual ambivalence illuminates the ways in which spending itself is a fusion of the desires to lose and to gain. This helps to explain how the socialist distinction between satisfying and addictive consumption misses the mark. Broadening this insight, we can see that Western thought about justice, originating in Judeo-Christian theology, conceals a fundamental ambivalence about both domination and gain by suggesting that inequality (beginning with that between God and man) is “justified” when the dominating party loses and the gainer submits. Ironically, however, the new post-utilitarian rationale for capitalism undermines this putative “justification” of social inequality in consumer-oriented capitalist societies by bringing our internal ambivalence about gain and dominance to the surface. This development creates an opportunity for a new beginning in Marxian social theory. The final sections of the essay suggest that social theory has been trapped in a debate over whether predators (and their human counterparts) kill in order to eat or eat in order to kill (Marx vs. Nietzsche). To break this trap we must shift the basis of social criticism from the metaphor of predation to the metaphor of parasitism. This changes the focus of critical analysis from unmasking the predator in every situation to identifying in every social structure the mechanisms of incorporation, mutual subversion, asymmetrical exchange, and surplus-creation (as distinct from equilibrium). If neither the desire for gain nor the desire for dominance are self-explanatory, then the Marxian critique of Nietzsche and the Nietzschean critique of Marxism both have valid points. The essay concludes with reflections about the importance of addressing the post-utilitarian rationale of capitalism with the same depth and comprehensiveness that we find in Marx's critique of its utilitarian rationale.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anspach, Mark: 1992, ‘Vengeance in Reverse: Reconciliation Through Exchange’,Stanford French Review 16(1), 77–85.
Balibar, Etienne: 1977,On the Dictatorship of the Proletariat, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, N.J.
Bataille, Georges: 1985, ‘The Notion of Expenditure’ inVisions of Excess: Selected Writings 1927–1939 (ed.) and intro. Allan Stoekl; trans. Allan Stoekl, Carl R. Lovitt, and Donald M. Leslie Jr., University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 116–136.
Bataille, Georges: 1988,The Accursed Share: An Essay on General Economy, Volume II (Consumption) (trans. Robert Hurley), Zone Books, New York.
Bataille, Georges: 1991,The Accursed Share: An Essay on General Economy, Volumes II (The History of Eroticism) and III (Sovereignty) (trans. Robert Hurley), Zone Books, New York.
Bataille, Georges: 1992a,On Nietzsche (trans. Bruce Boon; intro. Sylvère Loringer), Paragon House, New York.
Bataille, Georges: 1992b,Theory of Religion (trans. Robert Hurley), Zone Books, New York.
Benjamin, Jessica: 1988,The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination, Pantheon Books, New York.
Bowlby, Rachel: 1993,Shopping with Freud, Routledge, New York.
Brown, Norman O.: 1970,Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History, Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, Connecticut.
Brown, Norman O.: 1991, ‘Dionysus in 1990’, inApocalypse and/or Metamorphosis, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Cohen, G. A.: 1978,Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Connolly, William: 1993, ‘Beyond Good and Evil: The Ethical Sensibility of Michel Foucault’,Political Theory 21(3), 365–390.
Connolly, William E.: 1991,Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Das Gupta, Partha: 1991,An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Drakulic, Slavenka: 1993,How We Survived Communism and Even Laughed, Harper, New York.
Ehrenberg, John: 1992,The Dictatorship of the Proletariat: Marxism's Theory of Socialist Democracy, Routledge, New York.
Elster, Jon: 1989, ‘Self-Realization in Work and Politics: The Marxist Conception of the Good Life’, in Jon Elster and Karl Ove Moene (eds.),Alternatives to Capitalism, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 127–158.
Freud, Sigmund: 1959,Beyond the Pleasure Principle (trans. James Strachey; intro. Gregory Zilboorg), Bantam, New York.
Freud, Sigmund: 1960,Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego (trans. James Strachey; intro. Franz Alexander), Bantam, New York.
Freud, Sigmund: 1962a,Civilization and its Discontents (trans. James Strachey), Norton, New York.
Freud, Sigmund: 1962b,The Ego and the Id (trans. Joan Riviere, rev. James Strachey), Norton, New York.
Freud, Sigmund: 1963a,General Psychological Theory: Papers on Metapsychology (ed. and intro. Philip Rieff), Collier Books, New York.
Freud, Sigmund: 1963b,Therapy and Technique (ed. and intro. Philip Rieff), Collier Books, New York.
Friedman, Milton: 1962,Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Friedman, Milton: 1980,Free to Choose: A Personal Statement, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
Fromm, Erich: 1955,The Sane Society, Rinehart, New York.
Fromm, Erich: 1956,The Art of Loving, Harper, New York.
Fukuyama, Francis: 1992,The End of History and the Last Man, Free Press, New York.
Gargan, Edward A.: 1992, ‘A Revolution Transforms India: Socialism's Out, Free Market In’,New York Times 141, sec. 1 (Sunday, March 29), 1, col. 1.
Gilder, George F.: 1981,Wealth and Poverty, Basic Books, New York.
Goux, Jean-Joseph: 1990, ‘General Economics and Post-Modern Capitalism’,Yale French Studies 78, 206–224.
Hebb, D. O.: 1949,The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory, Wiley, New York.
Kautsky, Karl: 1964,The Dictatorship of the Proletariat, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Krugman, Paul: 1994, ‘Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession’,Foreign Affairs 73.2, 28–45.
Laplanche, Jean: 1989, ‘Why the Death Drive?’, in Lawrence Spurling (ed.),Sigmund Freud: Critical Assessments, Volume 2, Routledge, New York, pp. 429–453.
Levy, Steven: 1992,Artificial Life: The Quest for a New Creation, Pantheon Books, New York.
Luttwak, Edward: 1993a,The Endangered American Dream: How to Stop the United States from Becoming a Third World Country and How to Win the Geo-Economic Struggle for Industrial Supremacy, Simon & Schuster, New York.
Luttwak, Edward: 1993b, ‘Who's Bashing Whom? Trade Conflict in High-Technology Industries’,Times Literary Supplement 4691, 7–9.
Marcuse, Herbert: 1955,Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud, Vintage Press, New York.
Marcuse, Herbert: 1964,Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory, Beacon Press, Boston.
Marcuse, Herbert: 1966,One Dimensional Man, Beacon Press, Boston.
Mauss, Marcel: 1967,The Giht: The Forms and Functions Exchange in Archaic Societies (trans. Ian Cunnsion; intro. E. E. Evans-Pritchard), Norton, New York.
Meister, Robert: 1990,Political Identity: Thinking Through Marx, Blackwell, Oxford.
Meister, Robert: 1993, ‘Is Moderation a Virtue? Gregory Vlastos and the “Toxins of Eudaemonism” ’,Apeiron 26(3–4), 111–135.
Meister, Robert: 1995/6, ‘Sojourners and Survivors: Two Logics of Constitutional Protection’,Studies in American Political Development 9(2) (1995), 229–286;University of Chicago Law School Roundtable 3(1) (1996), 121–184.
Milton, John: 1963,Paradise Lost, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.
Naipaul, V. S.: 1990,India: A Million Mutinies Now, Viking Penguin, New York.
Neu, Jerome B.: 1996, ‘Boring from Within: Endogenous vs. Reactive Boredom’, in W. F. Flack, Jr. and J. D. Laird (eds.),Emotions in Psychopathology: Theory and Research, Oxford University Press, New York (forthcoming).
Nozick, Robert: 1974,Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Basic Books, New York.
Nussbaum, Martha C.: 1992, ‘Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defence of Aristotelian Essentialism’,Political Theory 20, 202–247.
Okin, Susan Moller: 1989,Justice, Gender, and the Family, Basic Books, New York.
Osborne, Kenan B.: 1990,Reconciliation and Justification: The Sacrament and its Theology, Paulist Press, New York.
Peirce, Charles Sanders: 1992, ‘Evolutionary Love’, in Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel (eds.),The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume I (1867–1893), Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Rawls, John: 1971,A Theory of Justice, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Rennie, John: 1992, ‘Living Together’,Scientific American 266.1, 122–131.
Rieff, David: 1993, ‘Multiculturalism's Silent Partner: It's the Newly Globalized Economy, Stupid’,Harper's Magazine 287.1719, 62–72.
Roemer, John E.: 1982,A General Theory of Exploitation and Class, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Roemer, John E.: 1988,Free to Lose: An Introduction to Marxist Economic Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Schumpeter, Joseph A.: 1970,Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Unwin University Books, London.
Scitovsky, Tibor: 1976,The Joyless Economy: An Inquiry Into Human Satisfaction and Consumer Dissatisfaction, Oxford University Press, New York.
Seery, John Evan: 1996,Political Theory for Mortals: Shades of Justice, Images of Death, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Sen, Amartya, John Muellbauer, Ravi Kanbur, Keith Hart, Bernard Williams (ed. Geoffrey Hawthorne): 1987,The Standard of Living, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Serres, Michel: 1982,The Parasite (trans. Lawrence R. Schehr), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Tawney, R. H.: 1952,Equality, Allen & Unwin, London.
Terrill, Ross: 1973,R. H. Tawney and His Times: Socialism as Fellowship, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Earlier versions of this paper were delivered at a conference in memory of Prof. Gregory Vlastos, Berkeley, California (May 1–3, 1992), Jawaharlal Nehru University (November 18, 1992), Stanford University (February 26, 1993), the Western Political Science Association (March 19, 1993), the Cultural Studies Colloquium, UC Stanta Cruz (April 26, 1993), the Centre for Basic Research, Kampala, Uganda (July 28, 1993), and the Conference on Identity, Modernity and Politics, SOAS, The University of London (September 14–15, 1994). I am grateful to A. Rai, R. Bhargava, J. Seery, M. Tunick, J. O'Connor, M. Mamdani, R. Hawkinson, T. Strong, P. Euben, R. Inden, A. Montefiore, W. Brown, B. Ollman, and P. Ollman for helpful comments on particular drafts. Throughout the gestation of this paper I have been deeply indebted to M. Cunningham for his role as a developmental irritant, and to N. O. Brown for pushing me to extremes. Were it not for them this paper would have turned out differently.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meister, R. Beyond satisfaction: Desire, consumption, and the future of socialism. Topoi 15, 189–210 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135389
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135389