Abstract
Two empirical applications of Cooperative Game Theory concerned with regional cooperation in the use of irrigation water are presented. Both studies attempt to derive income maximizing solutions for the participants and the related income allocation schemes. Distinction is made between transferable and non-transferable utility situations. The reasonableness and the acceptability of the schemes derived are later critically evaluated. Main findings are: (1) use of utility functions leads to problems in gains allocations, (2) the Core concept may be useless in this application because since it is either difficult to calculate or is empty in many cases, (3) gains allocation and the derived core are heavily dependent on probabilities of coalitions formation in the Shapley value or the Generalized Shapley Value.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Billera, L. J., Heath, D. C., and Raana, J.: 1970, ‘Internal Telephone Billing Rates - A Novel Application of Non-Atomic Game Theory’, Operations Research 26, November–December, 1978.
Binmore, K. and Dasgupta, P.: 1989, Economic Organizations as Games, Basil Blackwell, New York.
Dinar, A.: 1984, ‘Economic Analysis of Regional Wastewater Treatment and Use of Effluent in Irrigation, and Related Cost Benefit Allocation Schemes’ (Hebrew), unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, 190 pp., The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Dinar, A. and Yaron, D.: 1986, ‘Treatment Optimization of Municipal Wastewater and Reuse for Regional Irrigation’, Water Resources Research 22, 331–38.
Dinar, A., Yaron, D. and Kannai, Y.: 1986, ‘Sharing Regional Cooperative gains from Reusing Effluent for Irrigation’, Water Resources Research 22, 339–44.
Driessen, T.: 1988, Cooperative Games, Solutions and Applications, Theory and Decision Library, Series C: Game Theory, Mathematical Programming and Mathematical Economics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, MA.
Harsanyi, J. C.: 1959, ‘A Bargaining Model for the Cooperative n-Person Game’, in: Contribution to the Theory of Games, 1–4, A. W. Tucker and R. D. Luce (Eds.), Princeton University Press, NJ, pp. 325–355.
Heany, J. P. and Dickinson, R. E.: 1982, ‘Methods for Apportioning the Cost of a Water Resources Project’, Water Resources Research 18, 467–82.
Hildenbrand, W. and Kirman, A. P.: 1976, Introduction to Equilibrium Analysis, North-Holland, New York.
Frederick, K. D. and Gibbons D. C. (Eds.): 1985, Scarce Water and Institutional Change. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
Kalai, E. and Samet, D.: 1988, ‘Weighted Shapley Values’, in: Roth, A. E. (Ed.), The Shapley Value-Essays in Honor of Lloyd S. Shapley, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 83–99.
Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H.: 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives, Wiley and Sons, New York.
Kilgour, D. M., Okada, N., and Nishikori, A.: 1988, ‘Load Control Regulation of Water Pollution: An Analysis Using Game Theory’, Journal of Environmental Management 27, 179–94.
Littlechild, S. C. and Thompson, G. D.: 1977, ‘Aircraft Landing Fees: A Game Theory Approach’, The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 8, 186–204.
Loehman, E. T. and Winston, A.: 1976, ‘A Generalized Cost Allocation Scheme’, in: Stevens, A. and Lin, Y. (Eds.), Theory and Measurement of Economic Externalities, Academic Press, New York, pp. 87–101.
Nash, J. F.: 1950, ‘The Bargaining Problem’, Econometrica 18, 155–62.
Ratner, A.: 1983, ‘Economic Evaluation of Regional Cooperation in Water Use for Irrigation-Optimal Allocation of Water Quantity and Quality and the Related Income Distribution’ (Hebrew), unpublished Ms.C. Thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Schmeidler, D.: 1969, ‘The Nucleolus of a Characteristic Function Game’, SIAM, Journal of Applied Mathematics 17(6), 1163–70.
Shapley, L. S.: 1953, ‘A Value for n-Person Games’, in: Kuhn, H. W. and Tucker, A. W. (Eds.), Annals of Mathematics Studies, Contribution to the Theory of Games, No. 11 (28), 307–18.
Shapley, L. S.: 1971, ‘Cores of Convex Games’, International Journal of Game Theory 1, 11–26.
Shapley, L. S.: 1988, ‘Utility Comparison and the Theory of Games’, in: Roth, A. E. (Ed.), The Shapley Value-Essays in Honor of Lloyd S. Shapley, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 307–19.
Shubik, M.: 1985, ‘What Is Game Theory Trying to Accomplish? - Comment’, in: Arrow, K. J. and Honkapohja, S. (Eds.), Frontiers of Economics, Basil Blackwell, New York, 88–97.
Selten, R.: 1985, ‘What Is Game Theory Trying to Accomplish? - Comment’, in: Arrow, K. J. and Honkapohja, S. (Eds.), Frontiers of Economics, Basil Blackwell, New York, 77–87.
Vaux, H. J. and Howitt, R. W.: 1984, ‘Managing Water Scarcity: An Evaluation of Interregional Transfers’, Water Resources Research 20 (7), 785–92.
Wahl, R. W.: 1989, Markets for Federal Water, Resources for the Future, Washington D.C.
Williams, M.A.: 1988, ‘An Empirical Test of Cooperative Game Solution Concepts’, Behavioral Science 33, 224–30.
Yaron, D. and Ratner, A.: 1985, Efficiency and Game Theory Analysis of Income Distribution in the Use of Irrigation Water. Rep. Ser. 14, Institute of Agricultural Economics, University of Oxford.
Yaron, D. and Ratner, A.: 1990, ‘Regional Cooperation in the Use of Irrigation Water: Efficiency and Income Distribution’, Agricultural Economics.
Young, H. P., Okada, N., and Hashimoto, T. M.: 1982, ‘Cost Allocation in Water Resources Development’, Water Resources Research 18(1), 463–75.
Young, H. P.: 1985, Cost Allocation, Elsevier Scientific Publishers, New York.
Young, H. P.: 1988, ‘Individual Contribution and Just Compensation’, in: Roth, A. E. (Ed.), The Shapley Value-Essays in Honor of Lloyd S. Shapley, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 267–78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
During the course of this research in The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
On leave from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dinar, A., Ratner, A. & Yaron, D. Evaluating Cooperative Game Theory in water resources. Theor Decis 32, 1–20 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133625
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133625