Skip to main content
Log in

No norms and no nature — The moral relevance of evolutionary biology

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many think that evolutionary biology has relevance to ethics, but how far that relevance extends is a matter of debate. It is easy to show that “pop” sociobiological approaches to ethics all commit some type of naturalistic fallacy. More sophisticated attempts, like Donald Campbell's, or, more recently, Robert Richards', are not so easily refuted, but I will show that they too reason fallaciously from facts to values. What remains is the possibility of an evolutionary search for human nature. Unfortunately, evolutionary theory itself seems to imply that the quest for human nature will not be very promising. As far as there is such a thing as human nature, we will have to know it before we can meaningfully talk about its evolution. Anthropological data suggest that we differ widely in our normative judgments. And even where we seem to agree, there is good reason to doubt that we really do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Campbell, D. T.: 1978, ‘Social Morality Norms As Evidence Of Conflict Between Biological Human Nature And Social System Requirements’, in Stent (1978).

  • Edel, M. and Edel, A.: 1968,Anthropology and Ethics — The Quest For Moral Understanding, The Press of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P.: 1967,Theories Of Ethics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J.: 1984, ‘Primatology Is Politics By Other Means’, PSA (proceedings of the 1984 conference) Vol.2, 489–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding,S. and Hintikka, M. B. (eds.): 1983,Discovering Reality, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R.: 1983, ‘Have Only Men Evolved?’, in Harding and Hintikka (1983).

  • Hull, D.: 1978, ‘A Matter of Individuality’,Philosophy of Science 45, 335–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. S.: 1985,Vaulting Ambition, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaky, R. E. and Lewin, R.: 1978,People Of the Lake, Avon Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L.: 1977,Ethics — Inventing Right and Wrong, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L.: 1978, ‘The Law Of The Jungle: Moral Alternatives And Principles of Evolution’,Philosophy 53, 455–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maris, C. W.: 1981,Critique Of the Empirict Explanation Of Morality, Kluwer, Deventer.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNabb, D. G. C.: 1967, ‘David Hume’, in P. Edwards (ed.)The Encyclopedia of Philosophy IV, 75–90, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M.: 1980, ‘Gene-juggling’, in Montagu (1980).

  • Montagu, A. (ed.): 1980,Sociology Examined, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E.: 1942, ‘Reply To MyCritics’, reprinted in Foot (1967, pp. 33–49).

  • Murphy, J. G.: 1982,Evolution, Morality, And The Meaning Of Life, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. G.: 1969,Meaning And Argument, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. J.: 1986a, ‘A Defense Of Evolutionary Ethics’,Biology and Philosophy 1, 265–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. J.: 1986b, ‘Justification Through Biological Faith: A Rejoinder’,Biology and Philosophy 1, 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1973,The Philosophy Of Biology, Hutchinson University Library, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1979,Sociobiology: Sense Or Nonsense?, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1984a, ‘The Morality Of the Gene’,The Monist 67, 167–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1984b, ‘Is There A Limit To Our Knowledge Of Evolution?’BioScience 34, 100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. and Wilson, E. O.: 1985, ‘The Evolution Of Ethics’,New Scientist, October 1985, 50–52.

  • Sahlins, M.: 1977,The Use And Abuse Of Biology, Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stent, G. S. (ed.): 1978,Morality As A Biological Phenomenon, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, N. M.: 1981,On Becoming Human, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L.: 1986, ‘Biological Moralism’,Biology and Philosophy 1, 316–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigg, R.: 1982,The Shaping Of Man, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigg, R.: 1986, ‘Evolutionary Ethics’,Biology and Philosophy 1, 325–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O.: 1975,Sociobiology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O.: 1978,On Human Nature, Bantam Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Voorzanger, B. No norms and no nature — The moral relevance of evolutionary biology. Biol Philos 2, 253–270 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128832

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128832

Key words

Navigation