Skip to main content
Log in

Rules and games

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reconsiders the relationship between the rules of a game and its outcomes. We develop a notion of rule reform that leads to the selection of Pareto improved equilibria points. We then apply this notion to a series of naturally occurring fishing rules, including examples from Malaysia, India, Brazil, Turkey, and Canada. We show that reforming a game is conceptually akin to reforming an economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, E.N. and Anderson, M.L. (1977). Fishing in troubled waters: Research on the Chinese fishing industry in West Malaysia. Asian Folklore and Social Life Monographs, Vol. 100. Taipai: The Orient Cultural Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T.L. and Hill, P.J. (1975). The evolution of property rights: A study of the American west. Journal of Law and Economics 12: 163–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. (1968). Optimal timing of innovations. Review of Economics and Statistics 50: 348–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. (1974). A theory of rationing by waiting. Journal of Law and Economics 17: 73–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (1986). Local-level management and the commons problem: A comparative study of Turkish coastal fisheries. Marine Policy 10(July): 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C.W. (1980). Restricted access to common-property fishery resources: A game theoretic analysis. In P.-T. Liu (Ed.), Dynamic optimization and mathematic economics, 117–132. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clugston, M. (1984). Nova Scotia's lobster wars. Maclean's 84: 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons, J.R. (1957). Legal foundations of capitalism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordell, J.C. and McKean, M.A. (1986). Sea tenure in Bahia, Brazil. In Proceedings of the conference on common property resource management, 85–114. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R.A. (1986). Past and future: The temporal dimension in the law of property. Washington University Law Quarterly 64(Fall): 667–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faris, J.C. (1972). Cat harbour: A Newfoundland fishing settlement. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, S. (1967). Cognition and the catch: The location of fishing spots in a Brazilian coastal village. Ethnology 6: 417–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, S. (1970). The raft fishermen: Tradition and change in the Brazilian peasant economy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, D. and Shapley, L.S. (1962). College admission and the stability of marriage. American Mathematical Monthly 69: 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R., Ostrom, E. and Walker, J. (1989). The nature of common-pool resource problems. Papers presented at the Public Choice Society meetings, Orlando, Florida, 17–19 March.

  • Gordon, S. (1954). The economic theory of a common property resource: The fishery. Journal of Political Economy 62(April): 124–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddock, D.D. (1986). First possession versus optimal timing: Limiting the dissipation of economic value. Washington University Law Quarterly 64(Fall): 775–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. and Selten, R. (1988). A general theory of equilibrium selection in games. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1985). Protocol, payoff, and equilibrium: Game theory and social modelling. Working paper. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igarashi, T. (1974). A traditional technique of fishermen for locating fishing spots: A case study in the Tokara Islands. Journal of Human Ergology 3: 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala, V. (1986). Game theory models of fisheries management — A survey. In T. Baser (Ed.), Dynamic games and applications in economics, 252–266. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems #265. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottak, C.P. (1966). The structure of equality in a Brazilian fishing community. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.

  • Libecap, G.D. (1978). Economic variables and the development of law: The case of Western mineral rights. Journal of Economic History 38: 338–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K.O. (1979). Play by the rules or don't play at all: Space division and resource allocation in a rural Newfoundland fishing community. In R. Anderson (Ed.), North Atlantic maritime cultures: Anthropological essays on changing adaptations, 276–298. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1986a). An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice 48: 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1986b). A method of institutional analysis. In F.X. Kaufmann, G. Majone and V. Ostrom (Eds.), Guidance, control, and evaluation in the public sector, 459–475. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1988). Institutional arrangements and the commons dilemma. In V. Ostrom, D. Feeny and H. Picht (Eds.), Rethinking institutional analysis and development: Issues, alternatives, and choices, 101–139. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1989). Micro-constitutional change in multi-constitutional political systems. Rationality and Society 1(1)(July): 11–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (forthcoming). Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ostrom, V. (1980). Artisanship and artifact. Public Administration Review 40(July–August): 309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, S. (1983). Long Island Sound's lobster war rages on despite new rules. National Fisherman 65: 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C. and Meyer, R.A. (1975). The technology of public goods, externalities, and the exclusion principle. In E.S. Mills (Ed.), Economic analysis of environmental problem, 65–94. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raychaudhuri, B. (1980). The moon and net: Study of a transient community of fishermen at Jambudwip. Calcutta: Government of India, Anthropological Survey of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1973). A simple model of imperfect competition where 4 is few and 6 is many. International Journal of Game Theory 2: 141–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.A. and Weingast, B.R. (1981a). Structure and strategy: The two faces of agenda power. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Meetings, 3–6 September.

  • Shepsle, K.A. and Weingast, B.R. (1981b) Structure-induced equilibrium and legislative choice. Public Choice 37: 503–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M. (1982). Game theory in the social sciences: Concepts and solutions, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbeck, J.R. (1977). The California gold rush: A study of emerging property rights. Explorations in Economic History 14: 197–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbeck, J.R. (1981). A theory of property rights with application to the California gold rush. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1964). Theory of games and economic behavior. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, G.H. (1951). Deontic logic. Mind 60: 58–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, G.H. (1963). Norms and action: A logical enquiry. London: Routledge and Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, G.H. (1971). Explanation and understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors are appreciative of the support provided by NSF Grant Number SES-8619498 and comments made on a prior draft by Elizabeth Anderson, Peter Aranson, Peter Bernholz, Werner Güth, Michael Maschler, Vincent Ostrom, Edella Schlager, Urs Schweitzer, Reinhard Selten, Kenneth Shepsle, S.Y. Tang, James Walker, and four anonymous referees.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gardner, R., Ostrom, E. Rules and games. Public Choice 70, 121–149 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124480

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124480

Keywords

Navigation