Non-dimensional wind and temperature profiles in the atmospheric surface layer: A re-evaluation
- Ulf Högström
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Previous results of non-dimensional wind and temperature profiles as functions of ζ( = z/L) show systematic deviations between different experiments. These discrepancies are generally believed not to reflect real differences but rather instrumental shortcomings. In particular, it is clear that flow distortion has not been adequately treated in most previous experiments. In the present paper, results are presented from a surface-layer field experiment where great care was taken to remove any effects from this kind of error and also to minimize other measuring errors. Data from about 90 30-min runs with turbulence measurements at three levels (3, 6, and 14 m) and simultaneous profile data have been analysed to yield information on flux-gradient relationships for wind and temperature.
The flux measurements themselves show that the fluxes of momentum and sensible heat are constant within ± 7% on average for the entire 14 m layer in daytime conditions and when the stratification is slightly stable. For more stable conditions, the flux starts to decrease systematically somewhere in the layer 6 to 14 m. From a large body of data for near-neutral conditions (¦ζ¦ ≦ 0.1), values are derived for von Kármán's constant: 0.40 ± 0.01 and for Φ h at neutrally, 0.95 ± 0.04. The range of uncertainty indicated here is meant to include statistical uncertainty as well as the effect of possible systematic errors.
Data for Φ m and Φ h for an extended stability range (1 > ζ > − 3) are presented. Several formulas for Φ m and Φ h appearing in the literature have been used in a comparative study. But first all the formulas have been modified in accordance with the following assumptions: κ = 0.40 and (Φ h )ζ = 0 = 0.95; deviations from this result in the various studies are due to incomplete correction for flow distortion. After new corrections are introduced, the various formulas were compared with the present measurements and with each other. It is found that after this modification, the most generally used formulas for Φ m and Φ h for unstable conditions, i.e., those of Businger et al. (1971) and Dyer (1974) agree with each other to within ± 10% and with the present data. For stable conditions, the various formulas still disagree to some extent. The conclusion in relation to the present data is not as clear as for the unstable runs, because of increased scatter. It is, however, found that the modified curve of Businger et al. (1971) for Φ h fits the data well, whereas for Φ m , Dyer's (1974) curve appears to give slightly better agreement.
- Baldocchi, D. D., Verma, S. B., and Rosenberg, N. J.: 1983, ‘Characteristics of Air Flow Above and Within Soybean Canopies’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 25, 43–54.
- Bergström, H. and Högström, U.: 1978, ‘Calibration of a Three Axial Fiber Film System for Meteorological Turbulence Measurements’, Dantec Information, submitted.
- Businger, J. A., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y., and Bradley, E. F.: 1971, ‘Flux-Profile Relationships in the Atmospheric Surface Layer’, J. Atm. Sci. 28, 181–189.
- Dyer, A. J.: 1974, ‘A Review of Flux-Profile Relationships’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 7, 363–372.
- Dyer, A. J. and Bradley, E. F.: 1982, ‘An Alternative Analysis of Flux-Gradient Relationships at the 1976 ITCE’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 22, 3–19.
- Dyer, A. J. and Hicks, B. B.: 1970, ‘Flux-Gradient Relationships in the Constant Flux Layer’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 715–721.
- Dyer, A. J., Garratt, J. R., Francey, R. J., Mc Ilroy, I. C., Bacon, N. E., Hyson, P., Bradley, E. F., Denmead, O. T., Tsvang, L. R., Volkov, Y. A., Koprov, B. M., Elagina, L. G., Sahashi, K., Monji, N., Hanafusa, T., Tsukamoto, O., Frenzen, P., Hicks, B. B., Wesley, M., Miyake, M., and Shaw, W.: 1982, ‘An International Turbulence Comparison Experiment (ITCE 1976)’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 24, 181–209.
- Foken, Th. and Skeib, G.: 1983, ‘Profile Measurements in the Atmospheric Near-Surface Layer and the Use of Suitable Universal Functions for the Determination of the Turbulent Energy Exchange’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 25, 55–62.
- Gibson, M. M. and Launder, B. E.: 1978, ‘Ground Effects on Pressure Fluctuations in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, J. Fluid Mech. 86, 491–511.
- Högström, U.: 1982, ‘A Critical Evaluation of the Aerodynamical Error of a Turbulence Instrument’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 21, 1838–1844.
- Högström, U.: 1985, ‘Von Kármán's Constant in Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flow: Re-evaluated’, J. Atm. Sci. 42, 263–270.
- Koprov, B. M. and Sokolov, D. Yu.: 1973, ‘Spatial Correlation Functions of Velocity and Temperature Components in the Surface Layer of the Atmosphere’, Izv. Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics 9, 178–182 (English translation pp. 95–98).
- Lumley, J. L. and Panofsky, H. A.: 1964, The Structure of Atmospheric Turbulence, Interscience, New York, 239 pp.
- Nicholls, S. and Smith, F. B.: 1982, ‘On the Definition of the Flux of Sensible Heat’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 24, 121–127.
- Purtell, L. P., Klebanoff, P. S., and Buckley, F. T.: 1981, ‘Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow at Low Reynolds Number’, Phys. Fluids 24, 802–811.
- Rasmussen, K. R., Larsen, S. E., and Jörgensen, F. E.: 1981, ‘Study of Flow Deformation Around Wind-Vane Mounted Three-Dimensional Hot-Wire Probes’, Disa Information, 26, 27–34.
- Slob, W. H.: 1978, ‘The Accuracy of Aspiration Thermometers’, KNMI Scientific Report W.R. 78-1, De Bilt, 26 pp.
- Smedman, A. S. and Lundin, K.: 1986, ‘Influence of Sensor Configuration on Measurements of Dry and Wet Bulb Temperature Fluctuations’, J. Atm. and Oceanic Tech., submitted.
- Tennekes, H.: 1973, ‘The Logarithmic Wind Profile’, J. Atm. Sci. 30, 234–238.
- Thom, A. S.: 1971, ‘Momentum Absorption by Vegetation’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 97, 414–428.
- Webb, E.: 1970, ‘Profile Relationships: The Lon-Linear Range and Extension to Strong Stability’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 67–90.
- Wyngaard, J. C.: 1981, ‘The Effects of Probe-Induced Flow Distortion on Atmospheric Turbulence Measurements’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 20, 784–794.
- Wyngaard, J. C., Coté, O. R., and Izumi, Y.: 1971, ‘Local Free Convection, Similarity and the Budgets of Shear Stress and Heat Flux’, J. Atm. Sci. 28, 1171–1182.
- Yaglom, A. M.: 1977, ‘Comments on Wind and Temperature Flux-Profile Relationships’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 11, 89–102.
- Zilitinkevich, S. S. and Chalikov, D. V.: 1968, ‘Determining the Universal Wind-Velocity and Temperature Profiles in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, Izv. Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics 4, 294–302 (English version: pp. 165–170).
- Non-dimensional wind and temperature profiles in the atmospheric surface layer: A re-evaluation
Volume 42, Issue 1-2 , pp 55-78
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Ulf Högström (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Meteorology, Box 516, S-751 20, Uppsala, Sweden