Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic diversity and morphological differentiation in Liatris helleri (Asteraceae), a threatened plant species

  • Papers
  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Liatris helleri (Asteraceae) is an insect-pollinated herbaceous perennial endemic to several high-elevation sites in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina. Allozymes were used to describe the genetic diversity and population structure in nine populations of this rare, federally listed species. Differences in leaf morphology were also examined for greenhouse-grown plants representing several populations. The proportion of the total genetic diversity found among populations, as indicated by the allozyme data, was 16%. Higher levels of population differentiation were found for differences in leaf shape; population of origin accounted for 37% of the variation in maximum leaf width, while families within populations accounted for 7%. In contrast to many endemic species, L. helleri maintains fairly high levels of genetic diversity. For the species, the percent polymorphic loci was 87.5, the average number of alleles at variable loci was 3.00 and the gene diversity was 0.276. Mean population values were percent polymorphic loci =58.4, mean number of alleles per polymorphic locus =2.59 and gene diversity =0.219. The estimated gene flow was low (Nm=0.85–1.32) and a relatively high correlation (r=0.55; p<0.005) was found between linear geographic and genetic distance. This suggests that the populations are partially isolated by distance, despite the limited range (<60 km) of the species. We recommend that population distinetiveness be maintained in restoration efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett, S.C.H. and Kohn, J.R. (1991) Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants (D.A. Falk and K.E. Holsinger, eds) pp. 3–30. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, N.H. and Slatkin, M. (1986) A quasi-equilibrium theory of the distribution of rare alleles in a subdivided population. Heredity 56, 409–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheliak, W.M. and Pitel, J.A. (1984) Techniques for Starch Gel Electrophoresis of Enzymes from Forest Tree Species. Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Information Report P1-X-42. Canadian Forestry Service, Agriculture, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, C.T. and Biesboer, D.D. (1992) Monomorphism, reduced gene flow, and cleistogamy in rare and common species of Lespedeza (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79, 567–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. (1986) Population differences in quantitative characters and gene frequencies: A comment on papers by Lewontin and Rogers. Am. Nat. 127, 731–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaiser, L. (1946) The genus Liatris. Rhodora 48, 165–83, 216–63, 273–326, 331–82, 393–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godt, M.J.W. and Hamrick, J.L. (1993) Genetic diversity and population structure in Tradescantia hirsuticaulis (Commelinaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80, 959–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godt, M.J.W. and Hamrick, J.L. (in press) The mating system of Liatris helleri (Asteraceae), a threatened plant species, Heredity.

  • Gottlieb, L.D. (1977) Electrophoretic evidence and plant systematics. Ann. Miss. Bot. Garden 64, 161–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J.L. and Godt, M.J.W. (1989) Allozyme diversity in plant species. In Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources (A.H.D. Brown, M.T. Clegg, A.L. Kahler and B.S. Weir, eds) pp. 43–63 Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, P.W. (1985) Genetics of Populations. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karron, J.D. (1987) A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphism and self-compatibility in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners. Evol. Ecol. 1, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karron, J.D., Linhart, Y.B., Chaulk, C.A. and Robertson, C.A. (1988) Genetic structure of populations of geographically restricted and widespread species of Astragalus (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 75, 1114–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D.A. and Kerster, H.W. (1969) Density-dependent gene dispersal in Liatris. Am. Nat. 103, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. (1984) Detecting population differences in quantitative characters as opposed to gene frequencies. Am. Nat. 123, 115–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. (1986) A comment on the comments of Rogers and Felsenstein. Am. Nat. 127, 733–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.C. and Horvitz, D.G. (1953) Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. Am. J. Human Genet. 5, 107–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitton, J.B., Linhart, Y.B., Sturgeon, K.B. and Hamrick, J.L. (1979) Allozyme polymorphisms detected in mature needle tissue of ponderosa pine. J. Heredity 70, 86–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, G.F. and Hopper, S.D. (1983) Genetic diversity and the insular population structure of the rare granite outcrop species, Eucalyptus caesia Benth. Austr. J. Bot. 31, 161–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106, 283–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 70, 3321–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. (1977) F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Ann. Human Genet. 41, 225–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.E., Ahles, H.E. and Bell, C.R. (1968) Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A.R. (1986) Population differences in quantitative characters as opposed to gene frequencies. Am. Nat. 127, 729–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F.G. (1992) NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Setauket, NY: Exeter Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1988) SAS/Stat User's Guide, Release 6.03. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, B.A. (1974) Isolation by distance in Liatris cylindracea. Nature 252, 703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, B.A. (1975) Population structure and local differentiation in Liatris cylindracea. Am. Nat. 109, 511–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, B.A. and Levin, D.A. (1978) Morphological differentiation and neighborhood size in Liatris cylindracea. Am. J. Bot. 65, 923–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin, M. (1985) Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution 39, 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D.E., Haufler, C.H., Darrow, D.C. and Gastony, D.J. (1983) Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. Am. Fern J. 73, 9–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A.R. (1991) Off-site breeding of animals and implications for plant conservation strategies. In Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants (D.A. Falk, K.E. Holsinger, eds) pp. 182–94. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service. (1989) Heller's Blazing Star Recovery Plan. Atlanta, GA: US Fish and Wildlife Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Workman, P.L. and Niswander, J.D. (1970) Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago. Am. J. Human Genet. 22, 24–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1922) Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am. Nat. 56, 330–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16, 97–159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godt, M.J.W., Hamrick, J.L. Genetic diversity and morphological differentiation in Liatris helleri (Asteraceae), a threatened plant species. Biodivers Conserv 5, 461–471 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056391

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056391

Keywords

Navigation