AllaisMaurice. (1953). “Le Comportement de L'homme Rationel Devant le Risque, Critique des Postulates et Axiomes de L'ecole Americaine.” Econometrica
21, 503–546.Google Scholar
AllaisMaurice. (1979). “The So-called Allais Paradox and Rational Decisions Under Uncertainty.” In MauriceAllais and O.Hagen (eds.), The Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox
, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
BattalioRay C., John H.Kagel, and Don N.MacDonald. (1988). “Animals' Choices Over Uncertain Outcomes: Some Initial Experimental Evidence,” American Economic Review
75, 597–613.Google Scholar
Battalio, Ray C., John H. Kagel, and Jiranyakul Komain. (1988). “Testing Between Alternative Models of Choice Under Uncertainty: Some Initial Results.” Texas A&M Department of Economics working paper.
BeckerJoao L., and RakeshSarin. (1987). “Lottery Dependent Utility,” Management Science
33, 1367–1382.Google Scholar
BellDavid. (1982). “Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty,” Operations Research
30, 961–981.Google Scholar
BellDavid. (1985). “Disappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty,” Operations Research
33, 1–27.Google Scholar
ChewSoo Hong. (1983). “A Generalization of the Quasilinear Mean with Applications to the Measurement of Income Inequality and Decision Theory Resolving the Allais Paradox, Econometrica
51, 1065–1092.Google Scholar
Chew, Soo Hong. (1984). “An Axiomatization of the Rank Dependent Quasilinear Mean Generalizing the Gini Mean and the Quasilinear Mean,” John Hopkins University Department of Political Economy working paper.
Chew, Soo Hong. (1985). “Implicit-weighted and Semi-weighted Utility Theories, M-estimators, and Non-demand Revelation of Second-price Auctions for an Uncertain Auctioned Object,” Johns Hopkins University Department of Political Economy working paper #155.
Chew, Soo Hong, and Kenneth R. MacCrimmon. (1979). “Alpha-nu Choice Theory: An Axiomatization of Expected Utility,” University of British Columbia Faculty of Commerce working paper #669.
Chew, Soo Hong, and Larry G. Epstein. (1987a). “A Unifying Approach to Axiomatic Non-Expected Utility Theories,” John Hopkins University Department of Political Economy working paper.
Chew, Soo Hong, and Larry G. Epstein. (1987b). “Non-Expected Utility Preferences in a Temporal Framework with an Application to Consumption-Savings Behavior,” John Hopkins University Department of Political Economy working paper.
ChewSoo Hong, and William S.Waller. (1986). “Empirical Tests of Weighted Utility Theory,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology
30, 55–72.Google Scholar
CoombsClyde, and LilyHuang. (1976). “Tests of the Betweenness Property of Expected Utility,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology
13, 323–337.Google Scholar
Crawford, Vincent P. (forthcoming). “Equilibrium without Independence,” Journal of Economic Theory.
DekelEddie. (1986). “An Axiomatic Characterization of Preferences under Uncertainty: Weakening the Independence Axiom,” Journal of Economic Theory
40, 304–318.Google Scholar
EdwardsWard. (1954a). “The Theory of Decision Making,” Psychological Bulletin
51, 380–417.Google Scholar
EdwardsWard. (1954b). “The Reliability of Probability Preferences,” American Journal of Psychology
67, 68–95.Google Scholar
EdwardsWard. (1955). “The Prediction of Decisions Among Bets,” Journal of Experimental Psychology
51, 201–214.Google Scholar
EinhornHillel J., and Robin M.Hogarth. (1985). “Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Probabilistic Inference,” Psychological Review
92, 433–461.Google Scholar
EllsbergDaniel. (1961). “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms,” Quarterly Journal of Economics
75, 643–669.Google Scholar
EncarnacionJ. (1987). “Preference Paradoxes and Lexicographic Choice,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
8, 231–248.Google Scholar
FishburnPeter. (1982). “Nontransitive Measurable Utility,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology
26, 31–67.Google Scholar
FishburnPeter. (1983). “Transitive Measurable Utility,” Journal of Economic Theory
31, 293–317.Google Scholar
FishburnPeter. (1984). “SSB Utility Theory: An Economic Perspective,” Mathematical Social Science
8, 63–94.Google Scholar
Grether, David. (1981). “Financial Incentive Effects and Individual Decision Making”, California Institute of Technology working paper 401.
GretherDavid, and Charles R.Plott. (1979). “Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon,” American Economic Review
69, 623–638.Google Scholar
HandaJagdish. (1977). “Risk, Probabilities, and a New Theory of Cardinal Utility,” Journal of Political Economy
85, 97–122.Google Scholar
Harless, David W. (1988). “Predictions about Indifference Curves in the Unit Triangle: A Test of Competing Decision Theories”, Grinnell College working paper.
HersheyJohn, HowardKunreuther, and PaulSchoemaker. (1982). “Sources of Bias in Assessment Procedures for Utility Function,” Management Science
28, 936–954.Google Scholar
HeyJohn D. (1984). “The Economics of Optimism and Pessimism: A Definition and Some Applications,” Kyklos
37, 181–205.Google Scholar
Hey, John D. and Elisabetta Strazzera. (1988). “Estimation of Indifference Curves in the Marschak-Machina Triangle,” University of York Department of Economics working paper.
Hogarth, Robin, and Hillel Einhorn. (1987). “Venture Theory: A Model of Decision Weights,” University of Chicago Center for Decision Research working paper.
Hogarth, Robin, and Howard Kunreuther. (forthcoming). “Risk, Ambiguity, and Insurance,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
KahnemanDaniel, and AmosTversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica
47, 263–291.Google Scholar
KarmarkarUday S. (1978). “Subjectively Weighted Utility: A Descriptive Extension of the Expected Utility Model,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
21, 61–72.Google Scholar
KellerRobin L. (1985). “The Effects of Problem Representation on the Sure-Thing and Substitution Principles,” Management Science
31, 738–751.Google Scholar
LoomesGraham. (1988). “Further Evidence of the Impact of Regret and Disappointment in Choice under Uncertainty, Economica
55, 47–62.Google Scholar
LoomesGraham, and RobertSugden. (1982). “Regret theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty”, Economic Journal
92, 805–824.Google Scholar
LoomesGraham and RobertSugden. (1986). “Disappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice under Uncertainty,” Review of Economic Studies
53, 271–282.Google Scholar
LoomesGraham, and RobertSugden. (1987a). “Some Implications of a More General Form of Regret Theory,” Journal of Economic Theory
41, 270–287.Google Scholar
LoomesGraham, and RobertSugden. (1987b). “Testing for Regret and Disappointment in Choice under Uncertainty,” Economic Journal
97, 118–129.Google Scholar
LuceR. Duncan, and LouisNarens. (1985). “Classification of Concatenation Measurement Structures According to Scale Type,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology
29, 1–72.Google Scholar
MacCrimmon, Kenneth R. (1965). “An Experimental Study of the Decision Making Behavior of Business Executives,” unpublished dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
MacCrimmonKenneth R. and StigLarsson. (1979). “Utility Theory: Axioms Versus Paradoxes.” In MauriceAllais and O.Hagen (eds.), The Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox
, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co..Google Scholar
MacCrimmonKenneth R., and MasanaoToda. (1969). “The Experimental Determination of Indifference Curves,” Review of Economic Studies
36, 433–451.Google Scholar
MachinaMark. (1982). “Expected Utility Analysis Without the Independence Axiom,” Econometrica
50, 277–323.Google Scholar
Machina, Mark. (1983). “The Economic Theory of Individual Behavior Toward Risk,” Technical Report #433, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University.
MarkowitzHarry. (1952). “The Utility of Wealth,” Journal of Political Economy
60, 151–158.Google Scholar
MarschakJacob. (1950). “Rational Behavior, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility,” Econometrica
18, 111–141.Google Scholar
McCordMark, and RicharddeNeufville. (1986). “Lottery Equivalents: Reduction of the Certainty Effect Problem in Utility Assessment,” Management Science
, 32, 56–60.Google Scholar
MoskowitzHerbert. (1974). “Effects of Problem Representation and Feedback on Rational Behavior in Allais and Morlat-type Problems, Decision Sciences
5, 225–242.Google Scholar
PayneJohn W. (1973). “Alternative Approaches to Decision Making Under Risk: Moments versus Risk Dimensions,” Psychological Bulletin
80, 439–453.Google Scholar
PrestonMalcolm G. and PhilipBaratta. (1948). “An Experimental Study of the Auction-Value of an Uncertain Outcome”, American Journal of Psychology
61, 183–193.Google Scholar
QuigginJohn. (1982). “A Theory of Anticipated Utility,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
3, 323–343.Google Scholar
QuigginJohn. (1985). “Subjective Utility, Anticipated Utility, and the Allais Paradox,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
35, 94–101.Google Scholar
RoellAlissa. (1987). “Risk Aversion in Quiggin and Yaari's Rank-Order Model of Choice under Uncertainty,” Economic Journal
97, 143–159.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Ariel. (1986). “Similarity and Decision Making Under Risk (Is there a Utility Theory Resolution to the Allais Paradox?),” Hebrew University Department of Economics research report no. 156.
SchoemakerPaul. (1982). “The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations,” Journal of Economic Literature
20, 529–563.Google Scholar
Segal, Uzi. (forthcoming). “The Ellsberg Paradox and Risk Aversion: An Anticipated Utility Approach,” International Economic Review.
SlovicPaul, and SarahLichtenstein. (1983). “Preference Reversals: A Broader Perspective,” American Economic Review
73, 596–605.Google Scholar
SlovicPaul, and AmosTversky. (1974). “Who Accepts Savage's Axiom?,” Behavioral Science
19, 368–373.Google Scholar
SmithVernon L. (1982). “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science,” American Economic Review
72, 923–955.Google Scholar
Starmer, C., and Robert Sugden. (1987a). “Experimental Evidence of the Impact of Regret on Choice Under Uncertainity,” Economics Research Centre discussion paper no. 23, University of East Anglia.
Starmer, C., and Robert Sugden. (1987b). ‘Violations of the Independence Axiom: An Experimental Test of Some Competing Hypotheses,” Economics Research Centre discussion paper no. 24, University of East Anglia.
Starmer, C., and Robert Sugden. (1987c). “Testing Prospect Theory,” Economics Research Centre discussion paper no. 26, University of East Anglia.
SugdenRobert. (1986). “New Developments in the Theory of Choice Under Uncertainty,” Bulletin of Economic Research
38, 1–24.Google Scholar
ThalerRichard. (1985). “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,” Marketing Science
4, 199–214.Google Scholar
TverskyAmos, and DanielKahneman. (1987). “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions,” Journal of Business
59, S251-S278. Reprinted in Robin Hogarth and M. Reder (eds.) Rational Choice: The Cantrast Between Economics and Psychology
. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
WeberMartin and Colin F.Camerer. (1987). “Recent Developments in Modelling Preferences Under Risk,” OR Spektrum
9, 129–151.Google Scholar
Weber, Robert J. (1982). “The Allais Paradox, Dutch Auctions, and Alpha-Utility Theory” Northwestern University MEDS Department discussion paper #536.
YaariMenhem E. (1987). “The Dual Theory of Choice Under Risk,” Econometrica
55, 95–115.Google Scholar