The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Conceptual conflict has long been recognized as a factor that could facilitate student learning. Due, however, to the lack of a convincing explanation of why it occurs, and how it can be resolved, it has seldom been used in instructional design. Its potential use in instruction is particularly relevant in the light of the recent, well-documented finding that students' existing conceptions frequently constitute a barrier to effective learning. This article examines conceptual conflict in the light of an epistemological model of learning as conceptual change. This analysis shows that the conceptual change model provides an explanation of conceptual conflict which is sufficiently detailed to allow it to be used in the design of instruction. The results of two studies, the first of which addressed the concepts of mass, volume, and density, and the second, the concept of speed, show that instruction, designed in this way, is effective in changing students' existing conceptions.
- Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D. and Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Berlyne, D. E. (1965). “Curiosity and education,” in J. D. Krumboltz (Ed.), Learning and the Educational Process. Chicago: Rand, McNally & Co.
- Cantor, G. N. (1983). “Conflict, learning and Piaget: Comments on zimmerman and Blom's ‘Toward an empirical test of the role of cognitive conflict in learning’,” Developmental Review 3: 39–53.
- Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E. and Gunstone, R. F. (1982). “Cognitive research and the design of science instruction,” Educational Psychologist 17(1): 31–53.
- Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: Heath.
- Driver, R. and Erickson, G. (1983). “Theories-in-action: some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students' conceptual frameworks in science,” Studies in Science Education 10: 37–60.
- Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. New York: Harper and Row.
- Helm, H. (1980). “Misconceptions in physics amongst South African students,” Physics Education 15: 92–97.
- Hewson, M. G. (1982). “Students' existing knowledge as a factor influencing the acquisition of scientific knowledge,” unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
- Hewson, P. W. (1981). “A conceptual change approach to learning science,” European Journal of Science Education 3(4): 383–396.
- Hewson, P. W. (1983). “Microcomputers and conceptual change: the use of a microcomputer program to diagnose and remediate an alternative conception of speed,” paper presented at Annual Meeting, American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
- Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- McDermott, L. C. (1983). “Critical review of research concerning students' understanding of kinematics and dynamics,” invited lecture, International Workshop on Physics Education, La Londe les Maures, France.
- Murray, F. B. (1983). “Equilibration as cognitive conflict,” Developmental Review 3: 54–61.
- Nussbaum, J. and Novick, S. (1982). “Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflicts and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy,” Instructional Science 11: 183–200.
- Osborne, R. J. and Wittrock, M. C. (1983). “Learning science: A generative process,” Science Education 67(4): 489–508.
- Piaget, J. (1929). The Child's Conception of the World. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Piaget, J. (1964). “Development and learning,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2: 176–186.
- Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. and Gertzog, W. A. (1982). “Accommodation of a scientific conception: towards a theory of conceptual change,” Science Education 66(2): 211–217.
- Resnick, L. B. (1983). “Mathematics and science learning: A new conception,” Science 220: 477–478.
- Rumelhart, D. E. and Ortony, A. (1977). “The representation of knowledge in memory,” in R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro and W. E. Montague (Ed.), Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Siegler, R. S. (1983). “Five generalizations about cognitive development,” American Psychologist 38(3): 263–277.
- Strike, K. A. (1983). “Misconceptions and conceptual change: Philosophical reflections on the research program,” contributed paper, International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
- Tiberghien, A. (1983). “Critical review of research concerning students' understanding of temperature, heat and electric circuits,” invited lecture, International Workshop on Physics Education, La Londe les Maures, France.
- Toulmin, S. (1972). Human Understanding, Vol. 1: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts. Princeton: University of Princeton Press.
- Trowbridge, D. E. and McDermott, L. C. (1980). “An investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension,” American Journal of Physics 48(12): 1020–1028.
- Viennot, L. (1979). “Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics,” European Journal of Science Education 1(2): 205–221.
- Zimmerman, B. J. and Blom, D. E. (1983). “Toward an empirical test of the role of cognitive conflict in learning,” Developmental Review 3: 18–38.
- The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction
Volume 13, Issue 1 , pp 1-13
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links