Abstract
Wildlife was in decline in Zimbabwe while the resource was being managed centrally by the State in terms of conventional protectionist legislation. The legislation was changed in 1960 and this led to cautious institutional reforms, whereby responsibility for wildlife was gradually devolved to landholders who were encouraged to use it profitably. This was achieved without the State abrogating its ultimate responsibility for the wellbeing of the resource.
The CAMPFIRE programme was a response to the particular requirements of communally managed wild resources. Successful implementation required that appropriate institutions were in place. These allowed the peasants a meaningful say in the management of their wildlife and permitted them to use it profitably to generate a sufficient incentive to persuade them to conserve the resource on their land. As on large-scale commercial ranches, socio-economic factors proved more significant than ecological considerations in preserving wildlife on communally occupied land that is representative of much of Africa and the Third World.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Child, B. (1988) The Role of Wildlife Utilization in the Sustainable Development of Semi-Arid Rangelands in Zimbabwe. D.Phil Thesis. University of Oxford.
Child B. (1996) The practice and principles of community-based wildlife management in Zimbabwe: the CAMPFIRE programme. Biodivers. Conserv. 5. 369–398.
Child G. (1968) The Behaviour of Large Mammals During the Formation of Lake Kariba. Trustees National Museums of Rhodesia, Salisbury.
Child G. (1970) Game ranching. Proc. S. African Soc. Animal Product. 9, 47–51.
Child, G. (1971) The future of wildlife and rural land use in Botswana: Proceedings of the SARCCUS Symposium on Nature Conservation as a Land Use. Gorongoza National Park, Mozambique.
Child G. (1982) Managing wildlife for people in Zimbabwe. In National Parks, Conservation, and Development: The Role of Protected Areas in Sustaining Society (J.A. McNeely and K.R. Miller. eds) Washington, DC: IUCN/Smithsonian Institution Press.
Child G.F.T. and Heath R.A. (1990) Underselling National Parks in Zimbabwe: the implications for rural sustainability. Society Nat. Resources 3, 215–27.
Child G.F.T. and Riney T. (1987) Tsetse control hunting in Zimbabwe, 1919–1958. Zambezia 14. 11–71.
Cumming D.H.M. (1989) Commercial and safari hunting in Zimbabwe. In Wildlife Production Systems — Economic Utilization of Wild Ungulates (R.J. Hudson et al., eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hardin G. (1968) The tragedy of the Commons. Science 162, 1234–48.
Martin R.B. (1984) Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE). Harare: Department of National Parks and Wild Life Management.
Martin R.B. (1986) Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE), revised edn. Harare: Department of National Parks and Wild Life Management.
Martin, R.B. (1994) The Influence of Governance on Conservation and Wildlife Utilisation. Conservation through Sustainable Use Of Wildlife Conference, University of Queensland. Report of the Department of National Parks and Wild Life Management, Harare.
Martin R.B., Drury M. and Edwards T. (1977) Report on Operation WINDFALL. Harare: Department of National Parks and Wild Life Management.
Murphree, M.W. (1995) Optimal principles and pragmatic strategies: creating an enabling politico-legal environment for community-based natural resource management (CBNRM). Keynote Address, Conference of the Natural Resources Management Programme, Chobe, Botswana.
Stocking M.A. and Elwell H.A. (1973) Soil erosion hazard in Rhodesia. Rhodes. Agric. J. 70, 93–101.
Summers R. (1967) Archaeological Distribution and a tentative history of tsetse infestation in Rhodesia and the Northern Transvaal. Arnoldia (Rhodesia) 3, 13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Former Director of National Parks and Wild Life Management, Zimbabwe.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Child, G. The role of community-based wild resource management in Zimbabwe. Biodivers Conserv 5, 355–367 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051779
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051779