Skip to main content
Log in

Addition of A- and U-rich sequence increases the splicing efficiency of a deleted form of a maize intron

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant introns are generally short (<200 nt) and AU-rich, and an elevated AU content is necessary for efficient splicing. Further, an intron in some plant genes enhances gene expression by a post-transcriptional mechanism that results in an increase of cytoplasmic mRNA. The specific intron features responsible for efficient splicing and enhancement are not well characterized in plants. Internal deletions of up to 80% of two maize introns, Adh1 intron 1 and maize actin intron 3, indicate that large segments of these introns are dispensable for normal function. However, extensive deletion (>75%) of Adh1 intron 1 diminishes both intron enhancement and splicing efficiency. This finding suggests that there are internal sequence motifs required for intron function, and that these motifs are redundant. We attempted to repair a deletion-impaired Adh1 intron 1 variant by adding back either oligomers of defined sequence content or fragments of maize internal intron sequence. The addition of AU-rich oligomers improved splicing efficiency and in one example, a U-rich oligomer activated a cryptic 3′ splice acceptor. We also found that replacing the region proximal to the Adh1 intron 1 3′ acceptor with U-rich sequence improved splicing. We found that adding G- and C-rich oligomers did not improve intron function, but a C-rich oligomer activated a cryptic 3′ acceptor. The addition of internal intron sequence to an impaired intron improved splicing, and in one case, resulted in the activation of a cryptic 3′ acceptor. We present evidence that U-rich sequence immediately upstream of the 3′ splice junction increases splicing efficiency and contributes to, but does not uniquely specify, 3′ acceptor AG choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buchman AR, Berg P: Comparison of intron-dependent and intron-independent gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 8: 4395–4405 (1988).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Callis J, Fromm M, Walbot V: Introns increase gene expression in cultured maize cells. Genes Devel 1: 1183–1200 (1987).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Csank C, Taylor FM, Martindale DW: Nuclear pre-mRNA introns: analysis and comparison of intron sequences from Tetrahymena thermophila and other eukaryotes. Nucl Acids Res 18: 5133–5141 (1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dean C, Favreau M, Bond-Nutter D, Bedbrook J, Dunsmuir P: Sequences downstream of translation start regulate quantitative expression of Petunia rbcS genes. Plant Cell 1: 201–208 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dennis ES, Gerlach WL, Pryor AJ, Bennetzen JL, Inglis A, Llewellyn D, Sachs MM, Ferl RJ, Peacock WJ: Molecular analysis of the alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh1) gene of maize. Nucl Acids Res 12: 3983–4000 (1984).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans MJ, Scarpulla RC: Both upstream and intron sequence elements are required for elevated expression of the rat somatic cytochrome c gene in COS-1 cells. Mol Cell Biol 8: 35–41 (1988).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodall GJ, Filipowicz W: The AU-rich sequences present in the introns of plant nuclear pre-mRNAs are required for splicing. Cell 58: 473–483 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodall GJ, Filipowicz W: The minimum functional length of pre-mRNA introns in monocots and dicots. Plant Mol Biol 14: 727–733 (1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodall GJ, Filipowicz W: Different effects of intron nucleotide composition and secondary structure on pre-mRNA splicing in monocot and dicot plants. EMBO J 10: 2635–2644 (1991).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guthrie C: Messenger RNA splicing in yeast: clues to why the spliceosome is a ribonucleoprotein. Science 253: 157–163 (1991).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guthrie C, Patterson B: Spliceosomal snRNAs. Annu Rev Genet 22: 387–419 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanley BA, Schuler MA: Plant intron sequences: evidence for distinct groups of introns. Nucl Acids Res 16: 7159–7176 (1988).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hawkins JD: A survey of intron and exon lengths. Nucl Acids Res 16: 9893–9908 (1988).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang MTF, Gorman CM: Intervening sequences increase efficiency of RNA 3′ processing and accumulation of cytoplasmic RNA. Nucl Acids Res 18: 937–947 (1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lou H, McCullough AJ, Schuler MA: 3′ splice site selection in dicot plant nuclei is position dependent. Mol Cell Biol 13: 4485–4493 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lou H, McCullough AJ, Schuler MA: Expression of maize Adh1 intron mutants in tobacco. Plant J 3: 393–403 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Luehrsen KR, de Wet JR, Walbot V: Transient expression analysis in plants using firely luciferase reporter gene. Meth Enzymol 216: 397–414 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Luehrsen KR, Taha S, Walbot V: Nuclear pre-mRNA splicing in higher plants. Prog Nucl Acids Res Mol Biol 47: 149–193 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Luehrsen KR, Walbot V: Intron enhancement of gene expression and the splicing efficiency of introns in maize cells. Mol Gen Genet 225: 81–93 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Luehrsen KR, Walbot V: Insertion of non-intron sequence into maize introns interferes with splicing. Nucl acids Res 20: 5181–5187 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Luehrsen KR, Walbot V: Intron creation and polyadenylation in maize are directed by AU-rich RNA. Submitted (1993).

  22. McElroy D, Zhang W, Cao J, Wu R: Isolation of an efficient actin promoter for use in rice transformation. Plant Cell 2: 163–171 (1990).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Patterson B, Guthrie C: A U-tract enhances usage of an alternative 3′ splice site in yeast. Cell 64: 181–187 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Robberson BL, Cote GJ, Berget SM: Exon definition may facilitate splice site selection in RNAs with multiple exons. Mol Cell Biol 10: 84–94 (1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rossi P, de Crombrugghe B: Identification of a cell-specific transcriptional enhancer in the first intron of the mouse alpha-2(type I) collagen gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 5590–5594 (1987).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruby SW, Abelson J: Pre-mRNA splicing in yeast. Trends Genet 7: 79–85 (1991).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Solnick D, Lee SI: Amount of RNA secondary structure required to induce an alternative splice. Mol Cell Biol 7: 3194–3198 (1987).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Steitz JA: Splicing takes a Holliday. Science 257: 888–889 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. van Santen SV, Spritz RA: Splicing of plant pre-mRNAs in animal systems and vice versa. Gene 56: 253–265 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. White O, Soderlund C, Shanmugan P, Fields C: Information contents and dinucleotide compositions of plant intron sequences vary with evolutionary origin. Plant Mol Biol 19: 1057–1064 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wiebauer K, Herrero JJ, Filipowicz W: Nuclear pre-mRNA processing in plants: distinct modes of 3′-splicesite selection in plants and animals. Mol Cell Biol 8: 2042–2051 (1988).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wieringa B, Hofer E, Weissmann C: A minimal intron length but no specific internal sequence is required for splicing the large rabbit β-globin intron. Cell 37: 915–925 (1984).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luehrsen, K.R., Walbot, V. Addition of A- and U-rich sequence increases the splicing efficiency of a deleted form of a maize intron. Plant Mol Biol 24, 449–463 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024113

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024113

Key words

Navigation