Skip to main content
Log in

Transient gene expression in electroporated protoplasts and intact cells of sugar beet

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Factors influencing the transient expression of introduced foreign DNA in electroporated protoplasts and intact cells of sugar beet were determined by assaying for the activity of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT), using a rectangular pulse generating system. Extractable CAT activity depended upon 1) applied plasmid DNA concentration, 2) protoplast density, 3) the interaction between pulse field strength, duration, number, time interval between pulses and the resultant effect on culture viability, and 4) the physiological state of the protoplasts. Mesophyll protoplasts were more susceptible to damage by electroporation, and were more specific in their requirement for electroporations which allowed CAT expression, than were protoplasts derived from suspension culture cells. CAT activity was also demonstrated, at low levels, after electroporation of intact suspension culture cells, and could be increased by pectinase treatment of the cells before electroporation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeGreef W, Jacobs M:In vitro culture of the sugar beet — description of a cell line with high regeneration capacity. Plant Sci Lett 17: 55–61 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Frearson EM, Power JB, Cocking EC: The isolation, culture and regeneration ofPetunia leaf protoplasts. Dev Biol 33: 130–137 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fromm ME, Taylor LP, Walbot V: Expression of genes transferred into monocot and dicot plant cells by electroporation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 5824–5828 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gorman CM, Moffat LF, Howard BH: Recombinant genomes which express chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 2: 1044–1051 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hauptmann RM, Ozias-Akins P, Vasil V, Tabaeizadeh Z, Rogers SG, Horsch RB, Vasil IK, Fraley RT: Transient expression of electroporated DNA in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous species. Plant Cell Rep 6: 265–270 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Herrera-Estrella L, Depicker A, vanMontagu M, Schell J: Expression of chimaeric genes into plant cells using a Tiplasmid-derived vector. Nature 303: 209–213 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Howard EA, Walker JC, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ: Regulated expression of an alcohol dehydrogenase 1 chimeric gene introduced into maize protoplasts. Planta 170: 535–540 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lindsey K, Jones MGK: The permeability of electroporated cells and protoplasts of sugar beet. Planta (1987, in press).

  9. Meyer P, Walgenbach E, Bussman K, Hombrecher G, Saedler H: Synchronised tobacco protoplasts are efficiently transformed by DNA. Mol Gen Genet 201: 513–518 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morikawa H, Iida A, Matsui C, Ikegami M, Yamada Y: Gene transfer into plant cells by electroinjection through cell walls and membranes. Gene 41: 121–124 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Murashige T, Skoog F: A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Negrutiu I, Shillito R, Potrykus I, Biasini G, Sala F: Hybrid genes in the analysis of transformation conditions. 1. Setting up a simple method for direct gene transfer in plant protoplasts. Plant Mol Biol 8: 363–373 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider PH: Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J 1: 841–845 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Okada K, Takebe I, Nagata T: Expression and integration of genes introduced into highly synchronised protoplasts. Mol Gen Genet 205: 398–403 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ou-Lee T-M, Turgeon R, Wu R: Expression of a foreign gene linked to either a plant-virus or aDrosophila promoter, after electroporation of protoplasts of rice, wheat andSorghum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 6815–6819 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shillito RD, Saul MW, Paszkowski J, Muller M, Potrykus I: High efficiency direct gene transfer to plants. Bio/Technology 3: 1099–1103 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Werr W, Lorz H: Transient gene expression in a Gramineae cell line: a rapid procedure for studying plant promoters. Mol Gen Genet 202: 471–485 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Widholm JM: The use of fluorescein diacetate and phenosafranine for determining viability of cultured plant cells. Stain Technol 47: 189–194 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zimmermann U: Electrical breakdown, electropermeabilization and electrofusion. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 105: 175–256 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindsey, K., Jones, M.G.K. Transient gene expression in electroporated protoplasts and intact cells of sugar beet. Plant Mol Biol 10, 43–52 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00014185

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00014185

Key words

Navigation