Skip to main content
Log in

Functional responses of five cyprinid species to planktonic prey

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

The functional responses of five species of cyprinids (Chalcalburnus chalcoides, Vimba vimba, Abramis brama, Rutilus rutilus, and Scardinius erythrophthalmus) feeding on four planktonic prey types were measured in the laboratory. Although no alternative prey types were present, the response curves were sigmoid in most cases, because attack rates were not independent of prey density. The findings are explained as being the overt expression of the fishes& foraging tactics. The chief way of maximizing food uptake, according to our interpretation, is accelerating attack rates with increasing prey density. The ability of prey to escape or relative prey size may interfere with this strategy. C. chalcoides, the only obligatory planktivore among the species studied, attacks at higher rates and responds most markedly to changes in prey density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Abrams, P.A. 1982. Functional responses of optimal foragers. Amer. Nat. 120: 382–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curio, E. 1976. The ethology of predation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 250 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drenner, R.W. & S.R. McComas. 1980. The roles of zooplankter escape ability and fish size selectivity in the selective feeding and impact of planktivorous fish. pp. 587–593. In: W.C. Kerfoot (ed.) Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities, University Press of New England, Hannover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drenner, R.W., J.R. Strickler & W.J. O&Brien. 1978. Capture probability: the role of zooplankter escape in the selective feeding of planktivorous fish. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 35: 1370–1373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, A.G. & E.G. Durbin. 1975. Grazing rates of the Atlantic menhaden Brevoortia tyrannus as a function of particle size and concentration. Mar. Biol. 33: 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. 1982. The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., Philadelphia. 92 pp.

  • Furnass, T.I. 1979. Laboratory experiments on prey selection by perch (Perca fluviatilis). Freshwat. Biol. 9: 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M.B. 1981. Effects of turbidity on feeding rates and selectivity of bluegills. Trans. Amer. Fish Soc. 110: 446–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendron, R.P. & J.E.R. Staddon. 1983. Searching for cryptic prey: the effect of search rate. Amer. Nat. 121: 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, A. & H. Winkler. 1986. The influence of temperature on the embryonic development of three cyprinid fishes, Abramis brama, Chalcalburnus chalcoides mento and Vimba vimba. J. Fish Biol. 28: 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91: 385–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. 1965. The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 45: 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivlev, V. S. 1944. The time of hunting and distance travelled by the predator in relation to the population density of the prey. Zoologicheskij Zhurnal 23: 139–144. (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J. 1982. Comparison of searching behavior for zooplankton in an obligate planktivore, blueback herring (Alosa aestivalis) and a facultative planktivore, bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 1649–1654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J.R. 1973. Behavioral aspects of predation. pp. 73–111. In: P.P.G. Bateson & P.H. Klopfer (ed.) Perspectives in Ethology, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzaro, X. 1987. A review of planktivorous fishes: their evolution, feeding behaviours, selectivities, and impacts. Hydrobiologia 146: 97–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, S. R. & R.W. Drenner. 1982. Species replacement in a reservoir fish community: silverside feeding mechanics and competition. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 815–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, J.N. 1980. A stochastic foraging model with predator training effects: I. Functional response, switching, and run lengths. Theor. Pop. Biol. 17: 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNair, J.N. 1981. A stochastic foraging model with predator training effects. II. Optimal diets. Theor. Pop. Biol. 19: 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marten, G.G. 1973. An optimization equation for predation. Ecology 54: 92–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.G. 1964. The jackknife — a review. Biometrika 61: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orellana, C.P. 1985. Nahrungserwerb und Biologie der Seelaube Chalcalburnus chalcoides mento (Agassiz) im Mondsee. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, 69 pp.

  • Rashevsky, N. 1959. some remarks on the mathematical theory of nutrition of fishes. Bull. Math. Bioph. 21: 161–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Real, L.A. 1977. The kinetics of functional response. Amer. Nat. 111: 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Real, L.A. 1979. Ecological determinants of functional response. Ecology 60: 481–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, R.J. & S.J. Holbrook. 1984. Gape-limitation, foraging tactics and prey size selectivity of two microcarnivorous species of fish. Oecologia 63: 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D.W. & J.R. Krebs. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 247 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, C.R. & A.J. Risebrow. 1982. The influence of light level on the functional response of a zooplanktonivorous fish. Oecologia 53: 293–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, I.J., G. Peirson, M. Cryer & C.R. Townsend. 1983. The behavioural basis of prey selection by underyearling bream (Abrams brama (L.)) and roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)). Freshwat. Biol. 13: 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, H. & T. Moreno. 1984. Die Funktionelle Reaktion planktonfressender Fische. Sitzber. Österr. Akad. Wiss., Mathem. Naturw. Kl., Abt. I, 193: 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D.I. & W.J. O&Brien. 1984. The development and field test of a tactical model of the planktivorous feeding of white crappie (Pomoxis annularis). Ecol. Monogr. 54: 69–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winkler, H., Orellana, C.P. Functional responses of five cyprinid species to planktonic prey. Environ Biol Fish 33, 53–62 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002553

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002553

Key words

Navigation